Legal Problems in Determining Factual Actions as Dispute Object of the State Administrative Court in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v12i1.2949Keywords:
Factual action, dispute object, State Administrative CourtAbstract
This study’s aim is to analyze how the concept development of State Administrative Decision (KTUN) in Indonesia. It is also to analyze the legal problems of determining factual actions as the dispute object in the Administrative Court because, after the promulgation of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, there are some legal effects, especially after the emergence of factual action term as renewal. This study is normative research on the rules or the Law itself and the principle of positive Law by making legal materials the object of study. The approach used in the study is the approach of legislation and conceptual approach. The research data needed in this study is through the method of literature or documents and analyzed in a descriptive-qualitative way. The results showed that the KTUN before the Law Number 30 of 2014 is a written determination issued by a state administrative body or official containing administrative legal acts based on applicable laws and regulations, which are concrete, individual and final, giving rise to legal consequences for a person or civil legal entity. While the KTUN after the renewal is a written determination that includes factual actions, decisions of bodies and/or state administration officials in the executive, legislative, judicial, and other state administrations, based on the provisions of legislation and the General Principles of Good Government (AUPB), and final in a broader sense give decisions could have the potential to cause legal consequences, and/or could apply to citizens. The renewal is to cause problems such as chaos from the meaning of terminology, for example, the use of the term decision and or action. In addition, there is no specific explanation, so it is feared that legal norms are ambiguous, especially for judges in examining cases related to factual actions.
References
Arwanto, Bambang. 2016. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Akibat Tindakan Faktual Pemerintah”. Yuridika 31 (3):358-83. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v31i3.4857.
Asimah, D., Zainal Muttaqin, & Dewi Kania Sugiharti. (2021). Implementasi Perluasan Kompetensi Ptun Dalam Mengadili Tindakan Faktual (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad/Ood). Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 4(1), 152-170. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v4i1.531.
Brian Thompson, and Michael Allen, Case and Materials on Constitutional and Administrative Law, Oxford University Press, New York, 2002.
Cahyawati, Dwi Putri, Hukum Acara Peradilan TUN, Gramata Publishing, Jakarta, 2011.
Despan, Heryansyah 2017. Pergeseran Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jurnal Hukum Novelty 8 (1): 35-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v8i1.a5525.
H. D. Van Wijk, Hoofdstukken Van Administratief Recht, Vuga, s’Gravenhage, 1995.
Hadjon, Philipus M, Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat di Indonesia, Peradaban, Surabaya, 2007.
Haq. M., M., & Ilyas, A. (2022). Decision Concepts State Administration Post Entry into Law Number 30 Of 2014 Concerning Government Administration. Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 164-183. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.34008
Indroharto, Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara : Buku I Beberapa Pengertian Dasar Hukum Tata Usaha Negara, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta 1994.
Kennet, Culp Davis, Administrative Law Text, Third Edition, ST. Paul, Minn., West Publishing Co., 1972.
Kusdarini, Eny, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Adminitrasi Negara, UNY Press, Yogyakarta, 2011.
Misbahul Mujib, M., Mustari Kurniawati Muchlas, (2023), Achievements and Challenges of Human Rights Protection Policy in Realizing Good Governance in Indonesia and China, Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System (JHCLS) 3 (2), 328-360 https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v3i2.98
Manan, Bagir, Sistem Peradilan Berwibawa, FH UI Press, Jakarta, 2005.
Marbun, S.F, Hukum Administrasi Negara 1,FH UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2018.
Marbun, S.F, Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia, UII Press, Jogjakarta, 2003.
Marbun, SF dan Moh. Mahfud MD, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Administrasi Negara, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2006.
Mawardi, Ivan Paradigma Baru PTUN Respon Peradilan Administrasi Terhadap Demokratisasi, Thafa Media, Yogyakarta, 2016.
Mertukusumo, Sudikno, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1998.
Michael Allen and Brian Thompson, Case and Materials on Constitutional and Administrative Law, Oxford University Press, New York, 2002.
P. Nicolai, Bestuursrecht, Amsterdam, 1994.
P.M.B. Schrijvers and H.C.M. Smeets, Staats-en bestuurscrecht, Woltes Noordhoff, Netherlands : 2003.
Permana,Tri Cahya Indra. Catatan Kritis Terhadap Perluasan Kewenangan Mengadili Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Genta Press, Yogyakarta, 2016.
Putra, Hidayat Pratama, Tantangan Dalam Penanganan Perkara Tindakan Administrasi Pemerintahan Di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jurnal Hukum Peratun, Vol. 5 No.1 Februari 2022.
Putrijanti, Aju, (2015) Kewenangan Serta Obyek Sengketa Di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Setelah Ada UU No. 30/2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Jurnal MMH, 44 (4), https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.44.4.2015.425-430
Riawan, Tjandra,, Teori dan Praktik Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Kelompok Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya, Yogyakarta, 2015.
Ridwan, dkk, Perluasan Kewenangan Absolut PTUN, Kreasi Total Media, Yogyakarta, 2018.
Ridwan, Hukum Administrasi di Daerah, FH UII Press Yogyakarta, 2009.
Ridwan, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2007.
RIDWAN, Ridwan. (2022) Pengujian Tindakan Faktual dan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum oleh Pemerintah dalam Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), [S.l.], v. 11, (1) 89-108, https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jmhu/article/view/77264
Ridwan, Tiga Dimensi Hukum Administrasi dan Peradilan Administrasi, FH UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2009.
Ridwan, Urgensi Upaya Administratif di Indonesia, FH UII Press, Yogyakarta , 2019.
Sir Wiliam Wade and Christopher Forsyth, Oxford University Press, New York, 1994.
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif : Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2003.
Stevents, Irving, Constitutional and Administrative Law, Financial Times Pitman Publishing, London, 1996.
Sudarsono, (2017) Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014, Jurnal Tanjungpura Law Journal, 1 (2), 159 - 176 https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/tlj/article/view/24248
Sudiarawan, K. A., Karunian, A. Y., Mangku, D. G. S., & Hermanto, B. (2022). Discourses on Citizen Lawsuit as Administrative Dispute Object: Government Administration Law vs. Administrative Court Law. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 7(2), 499-486. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.60166
Tjandra, Riawan dan Y. Sri Pudyatmoko, Peradilan Tata Usaha sebagai Salah Satu Fungsi Kontrol Pemerintah, Penerbitan Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, 1996.
Tjandra, Riawan Hukum Adminitrasi Negara, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta 2018.
Utrecht, Pengantar Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia, Penerbitan dan Balai Buku Indonesia, Jakarta, 1957.
