The Effectiveness of SETS Learning Model toward the Misconception Decrease of Tenth Graders on Work and Energy Materials

Retno Yekti Utami; Puspo Rohmi

doi:10.14421/impulse.2023.32-04

Authors

Retno Yekti Utami UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Puspo Rohmi UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/impulse.2023.32-04

Keywords:

Misconception, SETS Learning Model, Work and Energy

Abstract

This study aims to determine the percentage of misconceptions in the work and energy sub-subject and to find out whether the SETS learning model is effective in reducing student misconceptions about work and energy. This research is quantitative research with the type of Pre-Experimental Design using the One Group Pretest-Posttest Design. The sampling technique used in this study was purposive sampling which is a technique for determining samples from members of the population with certain considerations by the desired criteria to be able to determine the number of samples to be studied by taking a sample of class X IPA 2, totaling 30 people. Based on the results of the pretest and posttest, the percentage reduction in misconceptions was 19.14% with an N-Gain of 44% which was included in the medium category. Research data were analyzed by normality test and hypothesis test. The results showed that the normality test using the Shapiro-Wilk test showed that the data were normally distributed with a pretest significance value of 0.842 and a posttest value of 0.520. The results of the research hypothesis using the t-test stated a significance value of 0.000, which means 0.000 <0.005 and H1 was accepted. The conclusion from this study is that the SETS learning model is effective in reducing the misconceptions of class X students on work and energy material.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

P. Rawh, A. Samsudin, and M. G. Nugraha, “Pengembangan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test untuk Mengidentifikasi Profil Konsepsi Siswa pada Materi Alat-alat Optik,” WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 84–89, 2020, doi: 10.17509/wapfi.v5i1.22888.

P. Suparno, Miskonsepsi & Perubahan Konsep dalam Pendidikan Fisika . Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, 2013.

R. Entino, E. Hariyono, and N. A. Lestari, “Analisis Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Sekolah Menengah Atas pada materi Fisika,” PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 177–182, 2021, doi: 10.33369/pendipa.6.1.177-182.

Y. Yuliati, “Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran IPA Serta Remediasinya,” Jurnal Bio Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 50–58, 2017, doi: 10.31949/be.v2i2.1197.

F. N. Hidayati, H. Akhsan, and Syuhendri, “Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas X pada Materi Elastisitas dan Hukum Hooke di SMA Negeri 1 Indralaya,” Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, vol. 3, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.36706/jipf.v3i2.3838.

M. Maison, N. Lestari, and A. Widaningtyas, “Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Usaha Dan Energi,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 32–39, 2020, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.314.

K. Khaerunnisak, “Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Melalui Simulasi Physic Education Technology (PhET),” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 7–12, 2018, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v4i2.109.

L. D. Herliandry, A. Harjono, and J. ’Ardhuha, “Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Fisika Peserta Didik Kelas X dengan Model Brain Based Learning,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 2018, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v5i1.166.

N. Wahyuni, Y. B. Bhakti, T. Z. Mutakin, and I. A. D. Astuti, “The Development of Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Instrument to Identify the Learners’ Misconception on Circular Motions,” Impulse: Journal of Research and Innovation in Physics Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 24–31, 2021, doi: 10.14421/impulse.2021.11-03.

R. Tanjung and M. Z. A. Hasibuan, “Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA Negeri Kota Medan pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika (Mekanika) dengan Menggunakan Metode Certainty of Response Index (CRI),” Jurnal Ikatan Alumni Fisika Universitas Negeri Medan, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 63–70, 2016.

E. Purwanto and Winarti, “Representasi Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor,” Papua Journal of Physics Education (PJPE), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 28–35, 2020, doi: 10.31957/pjpe.v1i1.1279.

W. Winarti, E. Pardiyanto, and F. Kurnianto, “Senior High School Students’ Understanding of Newton’s Laws in Outer Space: Identification of Misconceptions,” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 265–276, 2021, doi: 10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v10i2.8997.

R. E. Scherr, M. Plisch, K. E. Gray, G. Potvin, and T. Hodapp, “Fixed and Growth Mindsets in Physics Graduate Admissions,” Phys Rev Phys Educ Res, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020133.

H. Pramono and Nana, “Upaya Peningkatan Kemampuan Kognitif dan Komunikasi Ilmiah Siswa Kelas X MIA 1 SMA Negeri 1 Ciamis Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Inquiry,” Diffraction, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2019, doi 10.37058/diffraction.v1i1.812.

S. Asminah, “Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Biologi pada Peserta Didik Kelas X IPA 1 SMA Negeri 3 Pontianak dengan Menerapkan Model Pembelajaran SETS,” Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Pendidikan Karakter, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 34–39, 2021.

R. E. Yager and H. Akcay, “Comparison of Student Learning Outcomes in Middle School Science Classes with an STS Approach and a Typical Textbook Dominated Approach,” RMLE Online, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1–16, 2008, doi: 10.1080/19404476.2008.11462050.

E. Yuniastuti, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran SETS (Science, Environment, Technology and Society) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa Kelas VII SMP Kartika V-1 Balikpapan Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016,” Jurnal Sains Terapan, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 72–77, 2015, doi: 10.32487/jst.v1i2.94.

U. Usmeldi, R. Amini, and S. Trisna, “The Development of Research-Based Learning Model with Science, Environment, Technology, and Society Approaches to Improve Critical Thinking of Students,” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 318, Oct. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.10680.

M. J. Fitri, S. Trisna, and I. R. Yanti, “The Development of a Physics Module Based on the SETS Learning Model to Improve Students’ Conceptual Understanding,” Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 254–262, 2021, doi: 10.26737/jipf.v6i3.2131.

A. Ahmad, S. Suyono, and L. Yuanita, “Reduksi Miskonsepsi Asam Basa Melalui Inkuiri Terbuka dan Strategi Conceptual Change,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 286–293, 2017, doi: 10.26740/jpps.v3n1.p286-293.

E. van den Berg, Miskonsepsi Fisika dan Remediasi, no. July. Salatiga: Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, 1991.

J. R. Fraenkel and N. E. Wallen, How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, Seventh Edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2012.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan RnD. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2011.

Suryani. Fitri, Stepanus. Sahala. S, and Erwina. Oktavianty, “Remediasi Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran REACT Tentang Usaha Dan Energi Di SMA,” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1–9, 2019, doi: 10.26418/jppk.v8i9.35649.

S. Anggrayni and F. U. Ermawati, “The validity of Four-Tier’s Misconception Diagnostic Test for Work and Energy Concepts,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1171/1/012037.