Development of Multi Representative Physics E-Module with the Materials of the Momentum and Impulse Grade X High School/Islamic High School Students

Singgih Zein Massaid Ramadhan; Murtono

doi:10.14421/impulse.2023.32-06

Authors

Singgih Zein Massaid Ramadhan UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Murtono UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/impulse.2023.32-06

Keywords:

E-module, Momentum and Impulse, Multi representation

Abstract

The module is a teaching material that is packaged practically and systematically so that it can be accessed independently by both teachers and students. E-modules are adaptations of learning modules to the current digital era, so that in operation e-modules utilize technology, both computers and cellphones. This study aims to 1) produce multi-representation-based physics e-modules on momentum and impulse material that can be used in learning, 2) determine student responses related to multi-representation-based physics e-modules that have been produced, and 3) determine the quality of physics-based e-modules multi representation that will be used in classroom learning. This research belongs to R&D (Research and Development) research with the 4D Thiagarajan development model consisting of Defining, designing, Development, and Disseminating. This research is limited to the Development stage, to be precise, in extensive trials. The instruments used in this study included validation sheets, assessment sheets, and student response questionnaires. E-Modules are validated by material experts and media experts. The validation sheet in this study uses Aiken's V scale with three scales. In comparison, the e-module quality assessment was conducted by two material experts, two media experts, and two physics teachers. The e-module quality assessment sheet uses a Likert scale with four scales. The e-module trials in this study were divided into two stages: limited and extensive. Limited trials were conducted on ten students, while comprehensive trials were conducted on 36 students. Student response questionnaires used the Guttman scale with two scales: "agree" and "disagree" statements. The results of this study include: 1) multirepresentation-based physics e-modules on the subject of momentum and impulse have been produced to facilitate students' learning styles; 2) the quality of the e-module that has been developed based on material experts, media experts, and teachers has a successive average score of 3.29 in the very good category; 3.66 with very good category; and 3.74 with very good category; 3) The response of students to the e-module in limited trials and wide trials has a successive average score of 1.00 with the agreed category; and 0.95 with the agreed category.

Downloads

References

UU No. 20 Pasal 1 Ayat 1 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Indonesia, 2003.

A. Pane and M. D. Dasopang, “Belajar dan Pembelajaran,” FITRAH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 333–352, 2017.

M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, M. Hooper, L. Yin, P. Foy, and L. Palazzo, “Creating and Interpreting the TIMSS 2015 Context Questionnaire Scales,” in Methods and Works Procedures in TIMSS 2015, Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), 2015.

D. Permadi, A. Suyatna, and E. Suyanto, “Pengembangan Modul Berbasis Multirepresentasi Pada Materi Termodinamika,” Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 109–121, 2013.

S. R. Sa’idah, T. Prihandono, and S. Wahyuni, “Pengembangan Modul Momentum, Impuls dan Tumbukan dengan Strategi Concept Mapping di Madrasah Aliyah Negeri,” Junal Pembelajaran Fisika, vol. 07, no. 01, pp. 78–84, 2018.

Abdurrahman, Liliasari, A. Rusli, and B. Waldrip, “Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Multi Representasi untuk Peningkatan Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Kuantum,” Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 30–45, 2011, doi: 10.21831/cp.v1i1.4189.

I. N. Jiwanto, J. Purwanto, and Murtono, “Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Fisika Menurut Polya,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Pendidikan Fisika, Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2012, pp. 414–422.

L. Y. Kurniasari and W. Wasis, “Analisis Kemampuan Multi Representasi dan Kaitannya dengan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika,” Jurnal Pijar MIPA, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 142–150, 2021, doi: 10.29303/jpm.v16i2.2404.

R. Rendiyansah, I. D. P. Nyeneng, and E. Suyanto, “Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Multi Representasi pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor,” Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika Universitas Lampung, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 19–29, 2013.

Murtono, A. Setiawan, A. Zainul, and D. Rusidana, “Analisis Kesukaran Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Fisika Berdasarkan Representasi,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Pendidikan Fisika, Surakarta: Universita Sebelas Maret, 2014, pp. 92–98.

A. Mardatila, H. Novia, and P. Sinaga, “Penerapan Pembelajaran Fisika Menggunakan Multi Representasi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif dan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMA pada Pokok Bahasan Gerak Parabola,” Omega: Jurnal Fisika dan Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 33–39, 2019, doi: 10.31758/omegajphysphyseduc.v5i2.33.

S. Putrawangsa and U. Hasanah, “Integrasi Teknologi Digital dalam Pembelajaran di Era Industri 4.0 Kajian dari Persepektif Pembelajaran Matematika,” Jurnal Tatsqif, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 42–54, 2018, doi: 10.20414/jtq.v16i1.203.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.

B. Prihadi, “Penerapan Langkah-Langkah Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Saintifik dalam Kurikulum 2013,” Pekalongan, 2014.

R. A. Handayani, Sukarmin, and Sarwanto, “Pengembangan Modul Fisika Multirepresentasi Berbasis Problem Based Learning pada Materi Dinamika Rotasi dan Kesetimbangan Benda Tegar untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA Kelas XI,” INKUIRI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 313, 2018, doi: 10.20961/inkuiri.v7i2.23026.