KRITIK METODOLOGI PENAFSIRAN BUCAILLISME ATAS AYAT-AYAT SAINS

Authors

  • Ajar Permono UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2018.1901-01

Abstract

Discourse on scientific theology is quite often lead to debate among scholars and scientists today. The central point of the debate is on the relationship between the Qur’an dan science, namely the Total Agreement, Partial Agreement and the Refuse Group. Bucaillism as representation the Total Agreement group has the view that the Quran besides functioning as a moral-ethical guideline and guidance is also the source of all the phenomena of science. This article to photograph what and how bucaillism, find the cause and do methodological criticisms on it. This research concludes that the tendency towards the progress of science becomes an important point in the progress of the civilization of Muslims. With the harmonization of science and religion, it can increase creativity and innovation in doing business in making discoveries. Qur’an which contains many creeds and moral-ethical and verses of science can be a guide for scientists in developing science and technology so that the benefit of humans and the environment is always maintained. Nevertheless, the argumentative basis in scientific research is not only based on the literal meaning of the text but leads to the moral-ethical content.

Keyword: Bucaillism, Quran, Phenomena of Science

Abstract viewed: 952 times | PDF downloaded = 2992 times

References

Amal, Taufik A. Metode dan Alternatif Neomoderenisme Islam. Bandung: Penerbit Mizan, 2008.

Amal, Taufik A. Neomodernisme Islam Fazlur Rahman. Bandung: Penerbit Mizan, 2008.

Dhahabî (al), Muh}ammad Huseyn. al-Tafsîr wa al-Mufassirûn. Mesir: Maktabah Mus}‘ab bin Umar, 2004.

Fakhry, Majid. Sejarah Filsafat Islam; Sebuah Peta Kronologis. Bandung: Penerbit Mizan, 2011.

Fauzi, Mansur. Pro-Kontra Tafsir Ilmi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.

Guessoum, Nidhal. Islam’s Quantum Question Reconciling Muslim Tradition and Modern Science. London: I.B.Tauris and Co Ltd, 2011.

Hardiman, Budi. Seni Memahami: Hermeneutika dari Schleiermacher sampai Gadamer. Sleman: Kanisius, 2016.Amal, Taufik A., Neomodernisme Islam Fazlur Rahman, Penerbit Mizan, 2008.

Kawakibî (al), Abd al-Rah}mân. Tabic al-Istibdad in Akmâl Kamila. Beirut: Muassasa al-Arabiyya li-Dirasat wa al-Nashr, 2009.

Komarudin, Hidayat. Memahami Bahasa Agama Sebuah Kajian Hermeneutik. Jakarta: Paramadina, 2010.

Massimo, Campanini. “Qur’an and Science: a Hermeneutica Approach”. Journal of Qur'anic Studies. Vol. 7. No. 1, 2015.

Mehdi, Golshani. The Scientific Dimension of the Quran, dalam http://www.al-islam.org hlm.9/ diakses 16 Agustus 2018.

Palmer, Ricard E. Hermeneutics Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger and Gadamer. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1969.

Qarad}awî (al), Yûsuf. Islâm Had}arât al-Ghad. Kairo: El-Falah Foundation, 2008.

Ricoeur, Paul. Teori Interpretasi: Memberlah Makna dalam Anatomi Teks, Terj. Masnur Hery. Yogyakrta: Penerbit IRCiSoD, 2012.

Rifki, Muhida. Kiamat Berdasarkan Penemuan Sains Terbaru. Jakarta: Penerbit RAN-IFI, 2017.

Ritzer, George & Barry Smart (eds.). Handbook of Social Theory. London: SAGE, 2001.

Saleh, Daulay. Merajut Harmonisasi Filosofis, Sains, dan Agama: Menimbang Posisi Fritjof Capra di Tengah Antagonisme Sains dan Agama, dalam http://salehdaulay.com/ diakses 29 Agustus 2018.

Shihab, M. Quraish. Menabur Pesan Illahi. Tangerang: Lentera hati, 2010.

Sibawaihi. Hermeneutika al-Qur’an Fazlur Rahman. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra, 2009.

Syamsuddin, Sahiron. Hermeneutika dan Pengembangan Ulumul Qur’an. Yogyakarta: Nawesea Press, 2009.

Yahya, Harun. Keajaiban al-Qur’an, Terj. Rini N. Badariyah dan Ary Nilandari. Bandung: Arkan Publishing, 2008.

Downloads

Published

12-10-2019

How to Cite

Permono, A. (2019). KRITIK METODOLOGI PENAFSIRAN BUCAILLISME ATAS AYAT-AYAT SAINS. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 19(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2018.1901-01

Issue

Section

Articles