The Ottoman Approach to Scientific Classification in Tafsir History: A Study of Taskopruluzade Ahmad Efendi’s ‘Miftâhu’s-Saâde’

Authors

  • Hidayah Hariani Sakarya University, Turkiye

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v24i2.4521

Keywords:

Scholars, Taskopruluzade, Ottoman Empire, Scientific Classification , Tafsir History

Abstract

This study presents an analytical investigation of the historical aspect of tafsir within the Ottoman tradition, as found in the literary composition "Miftāhus-Sa'âda," which was authored by Taskopruluzade (d. 968/1561). This work holds a significant role in the classification of knowledge, serving as the foundational underpinning for the establishment of scientific traditions within the Ottoman Empire. Through the lens of this work, the historical narrative of tafsir is recontextualized to align with the scientific framework inherent in the Ottoman tradition, thus imparting a distinctive character to the realm of Qur'anic interpretation during the Ottoman Empire's tenure. Employing historical research methodologies encompassing heuristics, verification, interpretation, and historiography, this investigation critically examines the history of scientific classification, a bedrock for shaping the taxonomy of categorized disciplines within their respective contexts. The research delves deeply into the composition of "Miftâhu’s-Saâde," offering a comprehensive perspective on the evolution of tafsir history. The findings of this research underscore that, in the process of Science Classification congruent with the scientific ethos of the Ottoman Empire, Taskopruluzade, within "Miftâhu’s-Saâde," undertakes three pivotal tasks. Firstly, he evaluates classical tafsir works through the lens of scientific classification norms entrenched in the Ottoman tradition. Secondly, these appraised tafsir works are juxtaposed with others, facilitating the establishment of benchmarks and taxonomies that wield considerable influence in guiding the trajectory of tafsir history. Thirdly, a comprehensive exploration ensues into the interplay between interpretive works and the activities of interpretation. The implications of this discourse offer a substantive contribution, deepening the comprehension of tafsir history and the classification of knowledge within the scholarly milieu of the Ottoman Empire.

Abstract viewed: 228 times | PDF downloaded = 173 times

References

Akkâwî, Rihâb Khudhar. Mawsû’ah Abâqirat al-Islâm. 1st ed. Dâr al-Fikr al-Arabî: Beirût, 1993.

Andalūsī, Muhammad bin Yūsuf Abu Hayān. Tafsīr Bahri Al-Muhit, Dirāsah Dan Tahkīk: Adil Ahmad Abdi’l-Mawjūd Dkk. Beirut: Dār al-Kutūbi al-’Ilmiyyah, 1993.

Aslan, Gıyasettin. “Ilmu-Ilmu al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir Usulû Dalam Muqaddimah Ibn Khaldun.” Usûl İslam Araştırmaları 8 (2007).

Ata, Bahri. Sosyal Bilgiler Eğitimi Açısından Kınalızâde Ali Efendi’nin Ahlâk-î Alâ’î Üzerine Okumalar. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayinevi, 2015.

Atâyî, Nev`îzâde. Hadâiku’l-Hakâik fî Tekmileti’ş-Şakayık. İstanbul, 1989.

Baltacı, Cahid. “Hadâiku’ş-Şakâik ve Hadâiku’l-Hakâik’te Bulunmayan Ulema Hakkında Notlar”, İslâm Medeniyeti Mecmuası 7, no. 2, (1972) p. 54-65.

Başkan, Ömer. “‘Süregelen İki Tanımlama ve Tasnif Problemi Üzerine: El-İhfâ Mı? El-İhfâu’l-Lisân’i Mi? El-İzhâr Mı? L-İzhâru’l-Lisânî Mi?’” Hitit Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 6, no. 11 (2007): 103–4.

Çelebi, Hisim Ali. Al-ʿİḳdü’l-Manẓûm Fî Ẕikri Efâḍıli’r-Rûm. Kairo: İbn Hallikân, 1310.

Çevikel, Nuri. “Taşköprîzâde (İsâmeddîn) Ahmed Bin Mustafa’nın Mevzû’âtü’l-’Ulûm’unda İlim Kavramı.” Gazi Akademik Bakış 3, no. 6 (2010).

Cihan, Sadık. “Taşköpri-Zâde Ahmed Efendi’nin ‘Letâifu’n-Nebî’ İsimli Kırk Hadîsi.” İİFD 4 (1980).

Cündioğlu, Dücane, “Çağdaş Tefsir Tarihi Tasavvurunun Kayıp Halkası: ‘Osmanlı Tefsir Mirası’-Bir Histoğrafik Eleştiri Denemesi-”, Ankara: İslamiyât, 2/4 (1999).

Davutoğlu, Ahmet. “Tarih Idraki Oluşumunda Metodolojinin Rolü.” Divan 4, no. 7 (1999).

Demirci, Muhsin. “Tefsir Usulünün Temel Kaynakları.” Kur’ân Mesajı İlmî Araştırmalar Dergisi 2 no. 22 (2000).

Farabî. İhsâu’l-`Ulûm, terj. Ahmet Ateş, İstanbul, 1990.

Fitriah, dkk. “Kajian Etnolinguistik Bahasa Remaja Milenial di Sosial Media” Basastra : Jurnal Kajian Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia 10 no. 1 (2021), 1-20.

Furat, Ahmed Subhi. Eş-Şekâ’kun-Nu’mâiyye fî ‘Ulemâ’id-Devletil- ‘Osmanîye. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Yayinevi, 1985.

Gökbilgin, M. Tayyib. “Taşköprü-zâde dan Pandangan Ilmiahnya”, İTED 7 (1975) p. 76.

Gönül, Behcet. “İstanbul Kütüphanelerinde al-Şaḳāʾiḳ al-nuʿmāniya Tercüme ve Zeyilleri”, TM, 7-8 no. 11 (1945).

Hakkı, İzmirli İsmail. İlm-i Hilaf: Tartışmalar Bilimi, sad.: Ali Duman, Malatya, 2002.

Hallikân, Muhammed İbn Ebî Bekr İbn. Vefâyatû-l A’yân, Thk.: İhsân Abbas. Beyrut ts: Dâru’s-Sâdır, n.d.

Hariani, Hidayah.“Tafsir Tematik Kontekstual Atas Hak dan Peran Perempuan Dalam Membangun Dakwah Pada Masyarakat Modern”, Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu al-Qur’an dan Hadis 21 no.1 (2018) p.29.

Hariani, Hidayah. “Implikasi Penyandingan Kata Salat Dan Zakat Perspektif Semiotika.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu al-Qur’an Dan Hadis. 21, no. 1 (2020).

Harizmî. Mefâtihu’l-`Ulûm, neşr.: G. Van Vloten, Leiden, 1865.

Hassan, Hassan Ibrahin. Sejarah Dan Kebudayaan Islam: 632-1968. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Kota Kembang, 1986.

İbn Haldun. Ebu Zeyd Abdurrahman b. Muhammed, Mukaddime, çev.: Z. Kadiri Ugan, İstanbul, 1991.

Karim, M. Abdul. Sejarah Pemikiran Dan Peradaban. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Book Publisher, 2007.

Keraf, Gorys. Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka, 1997.

Matsumoto, David. The Cambridge dictionary of psycholog. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Mertoğlu, Mehmet Suat. “Süyûti.” DİA 38 (2010).

Mughi, Syafiq A.. Sejarah Kebudayaan Islam Di Turki. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Wacana Ilmu, 1999.

Mustofa, Taskoprizade Ahmad ibn. Miftāḥ Al-Sa’ādah Wa Miṣbāḥ al-Siyādah Fi Mauḍu’āt al-‘Ulūm. Beirut: Dār al-Kurub al- ‘Ilmiyah, 1985.

Özcan, Abdülkadir. “eş-Şakâiku’n Nu‘mâniye ve Osmanlı Biyografyacılığındaki Yeri”, Taşköprü’den İstanbul’a Osmanlı Bilim Tarihinde Taşköprülüzâdeler (haz. Celil Güngör), 2006.

Özcan, Abdulkadir. Eş-şekāiku'n-Nu'mâniyye, Ensiklopedia Islam TDV: TDV İslâm Araştırmaları Merkezi, 2010.

Rahman, Saad Abdul. Ensiklopedia Ulama Jilid 1. Kuala Lumpur: Jabatan Kemajuan Islam Malaysia, 2010.

Shadily, Hassan. Ensiklopedia Indonesia. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, 1983.

Syalabi, Ahmad. Mausu’ah al-Tarikh al-Islami Wa al-Hadlarah al-Islamiyyah. 3rd ed. Kairo: Maktabah Nahdlah al-Misriyyah, 1977.

Taşköprīzāde, ’Isām al-Dīn Abu’l-Hayr Ahmad b. Mustafā. Al-Shaqā’iq al-Nu’māniyyah Fī Ulemāi al-Dawlat al-Usmāniyyah. Istanbul: I.Ü. Fakultas Sastra. Yay, 1985.

Taşköprülüzâde, Ahmed Efendi. Mevzuat’ül Ulûm, 2nd ed, sad. Mümin Çevik, Üçdal Neşriyat, İstanbul, 2011.

Taşköprülüzâde, Ahmed Efendi. al-Shaḳāʾiḳu al-Nuʿmāniyyah fī ʿUlamāʾi al-Dawlat al-Islāmiyyah, terj. Muhammet Hekimoglu. İstanbul: Turkiye Yazma Eserler, 2019.

Taşköprüzâde, Ahmad Efendi. Miftāḥ al-Sa’ādah wa Miṣbāḥ al-Siyādah fi Mauḍu’āt al-‘Ulūm, Dār al-Kurub al-‘Ilmiyah, Beirut, 1985.

Taşköprüzâde, Ahmed Efendi, Mevzû`âtü’l-`Ulûm, çev.: Taşköprüzâde Kemalüddin Mehmed Efendi, Ahmed Cevdet Tab`ı, İkdam Matbaası, Darü’s-Saade, 1313.

Taşköprüzâde, Ahmed Efendi. eş-Şakaiku’n-Nu`maniyye fî `ulemâi’d-Devleti’l-`Usmâniyye. terj. Mecdî Mehmed Efendi, Hada’iku’ş-Şakayık. İstanbul, 1989.

Taşköprüzade. Eş-Şakaiku’n-Nu`maniyye Fî `ulemâi’d-Devleti’l-`Usmâniyye. İstanbul: Türkiye Yazma Eserler Kurumu Başkanlığı, 1989.

Tim Penulis. Ensiklopedia Ulama Terpilih Indonesia Jilid 1. Jakarta: Yayasan Amanah Kita, 2020.

Yavuz, Yusuf Şevki. Taşköprizâde Ahmed Efendi. Istanbul: TDV, 2011.

Zülfikar, Güngör (1997). “Önemli Bir Biyografik Eser: eş-Şakaiku’n-Nu‘mâniyye”, Diyanet İlmî Dergi 33 no. 1 (1997) p. 107-120.

Downloads

Published

31-07-2023

How to Cite

Hariani, H. (2023). The Ottoman Approach to Scientific Classification in Tafsir History: A Study of Taskopruluzade Ahmad Efendi’s ‘Miftâhu’s-Saâde’. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 24(2), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v24i2.4521

Issue

Section

Articles