Konstruksi Alat Ukur Interaksi Guru-Siswa di Sekolah Dasar Inklusif
Main Article Content
Abstract
Teacher effectiveness is reflected, among other things, on how they interact with students. This study was aimed at developing a reliable and valid teacher-student interaction scale to be used in inclusive primary schools. Collection of items (item pool) was conducted through literature study and focus group discussion, followed by content validity analysis. Factorial validity and internal consistency were examined by administering the scale to 101 teachers working in various inclusive primary schools in Jakarta. Factor analysis yielded three domains on teacher-student interaction with α = 0. 93. The three domains were emotional support (p = 0.11, RMSEA = 0.05, GFI = 0.91), classroom management (p = 0.13, RMSEA = 0.05, GFI = 0.90), and instructional support (p = 0.05, RMSEA = 0.06, GFI = 0.90). Convergence validity testing is recommended in subsequent research. Increased external validity can be achieved by involving teachers with a variety of demographic factors.
[Efektivitas guru dalam mengajar tercermin antara lain dalam bagaimana guru berinteraksi dengan siswa. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menyusun alat ukur interaksi guru–siswa yang reliabel dan valid untuk digunakan dalam konteks pendidikan inklusif di tingkat sekolah dasar. Pengumpulan aitem (item pool) dilakukan berdasarkan studi literatur dan diskusi kelompok terfokus, lalu dilakukan pengujian validasi konten. Validitas faktorial dan konsistensi internal dilakukan dengan melibatkan 101 guru yang mengajar di berbagai sekolah dasar inklusif di Jakarta. Analisa faktor menghasilkan tiga ranah (domain) interaksi guru-siswa dengan α = 0. 93. Ketiga ranah tersebut adalah dukungan emosional (p = 0.11, RMSEA = 0.05, GFI = 0.91), manajemen kelas (p = 0.13, RMSEA = 0.05, GFI = 0.90), dan dukungan instruksional (p = 0.05, RMSEA = 0.06, GFI = 0.90). Pengujian validitas konvergen direkomendasikan dalam penelitian selanjutnya. Peningkatan validitas eksternal dapat dilakukan dengan melibatkan guru dengan beragam faktor demografis.]Downloads
Abstract Viewed = 1412 times
PDF downloaded = 1703 times
Article Details
* Author(s) are the copyrigth holder(s) of their published articles and to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
References
Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2013). Observations of Effective Teacher-Student Interactions in Secondary School Classrooms: Predicting Student Achievement with the Classroom Assessment Scoring System-Secondary. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 76.
Beyazkurk, D., & Kesner, J. E. (2005). Teacher-child Relationships in Turkish and United States Schools: A Cross-cultural Study. International Education Journal, 6(5), 547–554.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
C. Pianta, R., & Hamre, B. (2009). Conceptualization, Measurement, and Improvement of Classroom Processes: Standardized Observation Can Leverage Capacity. Educational Researcher, 38, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332374
Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2010). Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction To Tests and Measurement, 96(6), 654–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1066381
Cook, B. G., & Schirmer, B. R. (2003). What Is Special About Special Education?: Overview and Analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 200–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669030370031001
Cozby, P. C., & Bates, S. C. (2015). Methods in behavioral research. New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill Education.
Curby, T. W., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Abry, T. (2013). Do Emotional Support and Classroom Organization Earlier In the Year Set the Stage for Higher Quality Instruction? Journal of School Psychology, 51(5), 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.06.001
Dukmak, S. (n.d.). Reseach Section: Classroom Interaction in Regular and Special Education Middle Primary Classrooms in the United Arab Emirates. British Journal of Special Education, 37(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8578.2009.00448.x
Emily Gallagher. (2001). The Effects of Teacher-Student Relationships: Social and Academic Outcomes of Low-Income Middle and High School Students. Applied Psychology OPUS, (Fall). Retrieved from https://steinhardt.nyu.edu/appsych/opus/issues/2013/fall/gallagher
Gurland, S. T., & Evangelista, J. E. (2015). Teacher–student Relationship Quality as a Function of Children’s Expectancies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(7), 879–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514554511
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early Teacher-child Relationships and the Trajectory of Children’s School Outcomes Through Eighth Grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625–638.
Heru Kurnianto Tjahjono. (2012). Validasi Item-Item Keadilan Distributif dan Keadilan Prosedural: Aplikasi Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) dengan Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Jurnal Manajemen Akutansi (JMA), 18(2), 115–125.
Imam Ghozali, & Fuad. (2008). Structural Equation Modeling Teori dan Konsep dengan Program Lisrel 8.80. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
John W. Santrock. (2010). Psikologi pendidikan. (Tri Wibowo B.S., Trans.). Jakarta: Kencana. Retrieved from http://opac.library.um.ac.id/oaipmh/../index.php?s_data=bp_buku&s_field=0&mod=b&cat=3&id=34537
La Paro, K. M., Pianta, R. C., & Stuhlman, M. (2004). The Classroom Assessment Scoring System: Findings from the Prekindergarten Year. The Elementary School Journal, 104(5), 409–426.
Mangunsong, F. (2009). Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus. Jakarta: LPSP3 UI. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/doc/55060416/Psikologi-Dan-Pendidikan-Anak-Berkebutuhan-Khusus
Nugent, T. (2009, January 1). The Impact Of Teacher-student Interaction On Student Motivation And Achievement. University of Central Florda, Florida. Retrieved from http://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/3860
OECD. (2009). Teaching Practices, Teachers’ Beliefs and Attitudes, 87–135. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264068780-6-en
Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. (2009). Conceptualization, Measurement, and Improvement of Classroom Processes: Standardized Observation Can Leverage Capacity. Educational Researcher, 38, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332374
Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student Relationships and Engagement: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Improving the Capacity of Classroom Interactions. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). New York, NY, US: Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17
Richards, J. C. (2010). Competence and Performance in Language Teaching. RELC Journal, 41(2), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210372953
Ruzek, E. A., Hafen, C. A., Allen, J. P., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Pianta, R. C. (2016). How Teacher Emotional Support Motivates Students: The Mediating Roles of Perceived Peer Relatedness, Autonomy Support, and Competence. Learning and Instruction, 42, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.004
Savage, R. S., & Erten, O. (2015). Teaching in Inclusive Classrooms: The Link Between Teachers Attitudes- Practices and Student Outcomes. Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy, 5(6), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0487.1000219
Solheim, E., Berg-Nielsen, T. S., & Wichstrom, L. (2012). The Three Dimensions of the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale: CFA Validation in a Preschool Sample. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(3), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911423356
Soodak, L. C. (2003). Classroom Management in Inclusive Settings. Theory Into Practice, 42(4), 327–333.
UU Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional – Referensi HAM. Retrieved from uu-nomor-20-tahun-2003-tentang-sistem-pendidikan-nasional/
Van de Putte, I., & De Schauwer, E. (2013). Becoming a Different Teacher…: Teachers’ Perspective on Inclusive Education. Erdélyi Pszichológiai Szemle, (December), 245–2651454.
Vaughn, S., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2003). What Is Special About Special Education for Students with Learning Disabilities? The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669030370030301
Zigmond, N. (2003). Where Should Students with Disabilities Receive Special Education Services?: Is One Place Better Than Another? The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669030370030901