Jalur Trotoar Responsif Penyandang Low Vision: Studi Kasus Pasar Baru Bandung
Main Article Content
Abstract
Sidewalks are public facilities and must be accessible to all users. This study departs from the lack of quality of public open space in Bandung and the absence of a sidewalk model that is responsive to people with low vision. The purpose of this research is to find out the design principles and to make responsive pavement design models of people with low vision. Data was collected by interviewing and observing the behavior and travel of people with low vision on some familiar and unfamiliar sidewalks in the city of Bandung. Data analysis was carried out from recorded interviews to find out the obstacles faced by people with low vision when exploring sidewalk space. This research produces criteria and models of pavement design that are responsive to persons with a low vision based on their limitations. The results of the study are expected to contribute to the concept of pavement design so that people with low vision can have equal and independent rights in accessing public space
[Trotoar adalah fasilitas publik dan harus aksesibel bagi semua penggunanya. Penelitian ini berangkat dari kurangnya kualitas ruang terbuka publik di Bandung dan belum adanya model trotoar yang responsif terhadap penyandang low vision. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui prinsip-prinsip perancangan dan membuat model perancangan trotoar responsif penyandang low vision. Data dikumpulkan dengan wawancara dan observasi terhadap perilaku dan perjalanan penyandang low vision di beberapa trotoar yang familier dan tidak familier di Kota Bandung. Analisis data dilakukan dari rekaman hasil wawancara untuk mengetahui hambatan yang dihadapi penyandang low vision ketika menjelajah ruang trotoar. Penelitian ini menghasilkan kriteria dan model perancangan trotoar yang responsif penyandang low vision berdasarkan keterbatasan yang dimiliki oleh mereka. Hasil penelitian diharapkan berkontribusi dalam konsep perancangan trotoar agar penyandang low vision dapat memiliki hak setara dan mandiri dalam mengakses ruang publik.]
Downloads
Article Details
* Author(s) are the copyrigth holder(s) of their published articles and to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
References
Bentley, I. (1985). Responsive Environments: A Manual for Designers. London: Architectural Press.
Berdahl, J. (2012). Glaucoma: Types, Symptoms, Diagnosis and Treatment [Kesehatan]. Diambil dari All About Vision website: https://www.allaboutvision.com/conditions/glaucoma.htm
Boucart, M., Naili, F., & Defoort, S. (2009). Scene Perception in Low Vision: A Study on People with Macular Degeneration. Journal of Vision, 9(8), 961–961. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.8.961
Brabyn, J. A. (2010). Some Vision Research to Building Environment Codes and Standards. Dipresentasikan pada National Institue of Building Sciences and GSA Workshop on Improving Building Design for Persons with Low Vision, San Fransisco.
Carr, S., Stephen, C., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public Space. Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
David, L. (2014, Juli 24). Affordance Theory (Gibson). Diambil 16 September 2019, dari Learning Theories website: https://www.learning-theories.com/affordance-theory-gibson.html
Destanto, K. (2004). Studi Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Tingkat Kepentingan Penyediaan Ruang Terbuka Publik (RTP) yang Aksessibel bagi Masyarakat Difabel (Studi Kasus: Alun-Alun Utara Solo) (Other, Universitas Diponegoro). Diambil dari http://eprints.undip.ac.id/4992/
Goldsmith, S. (2001). Universal Design (1 edition). Oxford; Boston: taylor & francis.
Golledge, R. G., Stimson, R. J., & Golledge, R. G. (1997). Spatial Behavior: A Geographic Perspective. New York; London: Guilford Press.
Halim, D. (2005). Psikologi arsitektur: Pengantar kajian lintas Disiplin (1 ed.). Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Haryadi, & Setiawan, B. (2010). Arsitektur, lingkungan dan perilaku: Pengantar ke Teori, Metodologi dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada Univ. Press, 2010.
Jacobson, R. D. (1998). Cognitive Mapping Without Sight: Four Preliminary Studies of Spatial Learning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(3), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.0098
Jose, R. T. (Ed.). (1983). Understanding Low Vision. New York: Amer Foundation for the Blind.
Kunto, H. (2008). Wajah Bandoeng Tempo Doeloe. Granesia Bandung.
Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and Characterization of Sex Differences in Spatial Ability: A Meta-Analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–1498.
Martokusumo, W., E. Kusuma, H., & Octaviana, S. (2013). Evaluation of Walkability on Pedestrian Sidewalk in Bandung.
Mujimin, W. M. (2012). Penyediaan Fasilitas Publik yang Manusiawi Bagi Aksesibilitas Difabel. Dinamika Pendidikan. Diambil dari https://eprints.uny.ac.id/5026/
Pallasmaa, J. (2012). The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses (3rd edition). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Pasqualotto, A., Spiller, M. J., Jansari, A. S., & Proulx, M. J. (2013). Visual experience Facilitates Allocentric Spatial Representation. Behavioural Brain Research, 236(1), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2012.08.042
Putu. (2016, Januari 17). Model dan Kriteria Perancangan Jalur Trotoar Responsif Penyandang Low Vision: Kasus Jalur Wyata Guna—Pasar Baru Bandung [Wawancara].
Saab, D. (2003). Conceptualizing Space: Mapping Schemas as Meaningful Representations. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3030.1767
Sari, S. O. (2016). Persepsi Penyandang Low Vision terhadap Ciri Medan di Ruang Terbuka Publik, Kasus: Proses Meruang (Wayfinding) di Kota Bandung (Universitas Langlangbuana). https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3030.1767
Schinazi, V. R., Thrash, T., & Chebat, D.-R. (2016). Spatial Navigation by Congenitally Blind Individuals. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 7(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1375
Sembor, A., Egam, P. P., & Waani, J. O. (2016). Evaluasi Jalur Pedestrian Bagi Tunanetra Terhadap Persyaratan Teknis Di Koridor Jalan Sam Ratulangi Kota Manado. Daseng: Jurnal Arsitektur, 5(1), 104–115.
Sjolinder, M. (1996). Individual differences in spatial cognition and hypermedia navigation.
Stubbs, S. (2014). Designing Supportive Environments for People with Low Vision. Journal of the National Institue of Building Sciences. Diambil dari https://ccdn.ymaws.com/www.nibs.org/resource/.../LVDP_gidelines_05285pdf
Tarsidi, D. (2011). Counseling, Blindness and Inclusive Education: Definisi Tunanetra. Diambil 20 September 2019, dari http://d-tarsidi.blogspot.com/2011/10/definisi-tunanetra.html
Yulius, Y. (2018). Ternyata Begini Trotoar yang Baik Menurut Koalisi Pejalan Kaki Kota Bandung. Diambil 27 September 2019, dari Tribun Jabar website: https://jabar.tribunnews.com/2018/01/31/ternyata-begini-trotoar-yang-baik-menurut-koalisi-pejelan-kaki-kota-bandung
Yuliwardhani, D. (2009). Prinsip Desain Aksesibilitas Ruang Luar bagi Tunanetra. (Sarjana, Universitas Brawijaya). Diambil dari http://repository.ub.ac.id/139985/
Zhang, J., & Patel, V. (2006). Distributed Cognition, Representation, and Affordance. Pragmatics and Cognition, 14(2), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.14.2.12zha
Zimring, C., & Templer, J. (1983). Wayfinding and Orientation by the Visually Impaired. Journal of Environmental Systems, 13. https://doi.org/10.2190/HJDK-607C-5MWT-H5VC