Marriage as Culmination Rather than Cause: Religious Conversion among Ethnic Chinese in Belitung

Authors

  • Kamsi Kamsi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Very Julianto Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Mu'tashim Billah Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2025.18105

Keywords:

Marriage, religious conversion, interfaith, ethnic Chinese

Abstract

The state guarantees freedom of religious expression for all its citizens, regardless of their beliefs. However, during the New Order era, this freedom was paradoxically curtailed, particularly for individuals of Chinese descent. Chinese Indonesians were prohibited from openly expressing their Chinese identity, including through religious affiliation. They were compelled to reidentify their religion under one of the five officially recognized religions at the time. When it comes to marriage registration, many individuals converted to one of these state-recognized religions. This article sheds light on the extent to which faith and love are intertwined in the phenomenon of religious conversion to Islam in Belitung. Employing a snowball sampling method, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 ethnic Chinese individuals from Belitung, aged between 30 and 63 years. These informants were Chinese Indonesians who converted to Islam following the legalization of Confucianism. The results reveal that marriage functioned as a pivotal factor in the religious conversion process among ethnic Chinese in Belitung, serving not as the initial impetus but rather as the culmination of an extended period of religious exploration. Male participants frequently reported earlier exposure to Islamic education and social environments, indicative of a phase characterized by exploration and engagement prior to formalizing their religious commitment through marriage. Conversely, female participants appeared to be more profoundly influenced by cultural norms emphasizing spousal loyalty and the legal-religious frameworks governing marriage in Indonesia.

Negara menjamin ekspresi keagamaan setiap warga negara, apapun keyakinannya. Paradoksnya, kebebasan beragama di Era Orde Baru dibatasi, khususnya kepada keturunan Tionghoa. Orang Tionghoa tidak diperbolehkan untuk mengekspresikan ketionghoaan mereka dalam bentuk apapun, termasuk agama. Mereka harus mengidentifikasi kembali agama mereka menjadi salah satu dari lima agama resmi pada saat itu. Untuk memudahkan proses administrasi, salah satunya perkawinan, mereka mengonversi agama menjadi salah satu agama yang diakui negara. Artikel ini menyoroti sejauh mana keyakinan dan cinta saling berkaitan dalam pengalaman konversi agama ke Islam para etnis Tionghoa di Belitung. Dengan menggunakan teknik sampeling bola salju, kami melakukan wawancara individu semi terstruktur dengan 15 etnis Tionghoa Belitung yang berusia 30 hingga 63 tahun. Narasumber adalah orang Tionghoa yang memilih untuk melakukan konversi agama ke Islam, setelah disahkannya Konfusianisme. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa pernikahan memainkan peran yang menentukan dalam konversi agama etnis Tionghoa di Belitung, bukan sebagai penyebab utama tetapi sebagai puncak komitmen dalam proses eksplorasi agama yang lebih panjang. Peserta laki-laki sering mengalami paparan lebih awal terhadap pendidikan Islam dan lingkungan sosial, mencerminkan tahap pencarian dan pertemuan sebelum mengukuhkan komitmen mereka melalui pernikahan. Sebaliknya, peserta perempuan lebih kuat dipengaruhi oleh ekspektasi budaya akan kesetiaan kepada suami dan kerangka hukum-agama pernikahan di Indonesia.

References

Afda’u, Faisal, Budi Prasetyo, and Saryana Saryana. “Membedah Pengaturan Dan Sanksi Pernikahan Beda Agama Dalam Hukum Indonesia.” Binamulia Hukum 13, no. 2 (2024): 393–406. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i2.946

Ahmad, Skehteshamuddin, and Sk Ehteshamuddin Ahmad. “Marriage and the Issue of Conversion under Muslim Personal Law during the Colonial Period.” Social Scientist 42, no. 11/12 (2014): 71–84. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24372903

Aini, Noryamin, Ariane Utomo, and Peter McDonald. “Interreligious Marriage in Indonesia.” Journal of Religion and Demography 6, no. 1 (2019): 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1163/2589742X-00601005.

Al-Amudi, Muhammad. “Konversi Agama Menjadi Mualaf Pada Orang Yang Menikah.” Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 2012.

Aldridge, David. “Religious Education’s Double Hermeneutic.” British Journal of Religious Education 40, no. 3 (September 2018): 245–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2018.1493267.

Ali, Muhamad. “Fatwas on Inter-Faith Marriage in Indonesia.” Studia Islamika 9, no. 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v9i3.658

Amiruddin, Tahir Kasnawi, Andi Agustang, and Rabihatun Idris. “RELIGIOUS CONVERSION IN MARRIED LIFE IN MAKASSAR, THE CASE OF CHRISTIANITY TO ISLAM.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of ACADEMIC RESEARCH 6, no. 6 (2014). https://doi.org/10.7813/2075-4124.2014/6-6/B.41

Asiah, Nur. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Undang-Undang Perkawinan Dan.” Jurnal Hukum Samudra Kadilan 10, no. 2 (2015): 204–14. https://ejurnalunsam.id/index.php/jhsk/article/view/120

Asy’ari, Asy’ari, and Triansyah Fisa. “Interfaith Marriage in Perspectives of Classical and Modern Scholars.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 2022, 287–300.

Aziz, Abdul, and Lukman Hakim. “Conversion to Islam as a Strategy for Legalizing Marriage: Experiences of Interfaith Couples in East Jakarta.” Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 58, no. 1 (2024): 47–86. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v58i1.1391

Aziz, Ahmad Amir, Nurul Hidayat, Universitas Islam, and Negeri Mataram. “Konversi Agama Dan Interaksi Komunitas Muallaf Di Denpasar.” Jurnal Penelitian Keislaman 7, no. 1 (2020): 175–200. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340754688_KONVERSI_AGAMA_DAN_INTERAKSI_KOMUNITAS_MUALLAF_DI_DENPASAR

Beatty, Andrew. “The Tell-Tale Heart: Conversion and Emotion in Nias.” Ethnos 77, no. 3 (September 2012): 295–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2011.609943.

Boyatzis, Richard E. Transforming Qualitative Information Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Case Western Reserve University, 1998.

BPS. “Kewarganegaraan, Suku Bangsa, Agama, Dan Bahasa Sehari- Hari Penduduk Indonesia.” Badan Pusat Statistik, 2010.

Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, no. 2 (July 2006): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Creswell, John W., William E. Hanson, Vicki L. Clark Plano, Alejandro Morales, Vicki L. Clark Plano, and Alejandro Morales. “Qualitative Research Designs: Selection and Implementation.” The Counseling Psychologist 35, no. 2 (June 20017): 236–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287390.

Dariyo, Agoes. “Conversion of Religion in Muslim Marriage Lives.” Psikis: Jurnal Psikologi Islami 7, no. 1 (2021): 86–94. https://doi.org/10.19109/psikis.v7i1.7481

Fatimawali, Fatimawali. “DISKURSUS PEREMPUAN SEBAGAI KEPALA RUMAH TANGGA (TEORI FEMINIST JURISPRUDENCE).” Musawa: Journal for Gender Studies 16, no. 1 (2024): 52–62. https://doi.org/10.24239/msw.v16i1.3135

Gallup. “Religion Prevails in the World .” Gallup International, April 2017.

Giblin, Susan. “Civil Society Groups Overcoming Stereotypes? Chinese Indonesian Civil Society Groups in Post-Suharto Indonesia.” Asian Ethnicity 4, no. 3 (October 2003): 353–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343900032000117196.

Gondomono. Pengantar: Upaya Mencari Jati Diri Dan Keanekaragaman Kelompok Etnik Cina. Jakarta: PT Intisari Mediatama, 2002.

Gufron, Uup. “Corak Moderasi Beragama Keluarga Mualaf Tionghoa (Studi Kasus Jamaah Masjid Lautze Jakarta Pusat).” Jurnal Bimas Islam 12, no. 2 (December 27, 2019): 205–32. https://doi.org/10.37302/jbi.v12i2.115.

Hand, Michael. “Religious Education and Religious Choice.” Journal of Beliefs and Values 36, no. 1 (January 2015): 31–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2015.1013817.

Ibrahim, Ibrahim, Arief Hidayat, and Herza Herza. “Habituation of Chinese Subculture amid Bangka Malay Domination: The Role-Sharing Politics.” Society 10, no. 2 (2022): 255–70. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v10i2.424

Ilahi, Kurnial, Jamaluddin Rabain, and Suja’i Sarifandi. “Dari Islam Ke Kristen: Konversi Agama Pada Masyarakat Suku Minangkabau.” Madania: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 8, no. 2 (2019): 201–27. https://doi.org/10.24014/jiik.v8i2.5728.

Imaduddin, Zhorif Agung, Deslaely Putranti, and Muhammad Habibi Miftakhul Marwa. “Interreligious Marriage in Indonesia and Malaysia: Strict and Loose Legal Policy.” Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 17, no. 2 (2024): 185–204. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2024.17203

Khairiah, Khairiah. “Fenomena Konversi Agama Di Kota Pekanbaru (Kajian Tentang Pola Dan Makna).” Toleransi: Media Ilmiah Komunikasi Umat Beragama 10, no. 2 (2019): 151–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/trs.v10i2.7083

Leamaster, Reid J., and Anning Hu. “Popular Buddhists: The Relationship between Popular Religious Involvement and Buddhist Identity in Contemporary China.” Sociology of Religion: A Quarterly Review 75, no. 2 (2014): 234–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srt057.

Lofland, John, and Rodney Stark. “Becoming a World-Saver: A Theory of Conversion to a Deviant Perspective.” Religion in Sociological Perspective, 1973, 28–47.

Marshall, Paul. “The Ambiguities of Religious Freedom in Indonesia.” Review of Faith and International Affairs 16, no. 1 (January 2018): 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2018.1433588.

Marzali, Amri. “Pemetaan Sosial-Politik Kelompok Etnik Cina Di Indonesia.” Masyarakat Indonesia 37, no. 2 (January 2011): 47–84. https://doi.org/10.14203/JMI.V37I2.630.

Muhammad, Romli, Thohir Luth, Rachmi Sulistyarini, and Siti Hamidah. “Legal Consideration of Legal Conversion in Different Religious Marriage in Indonesia.” Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences (RJOAS) 12 (2020): 89–98. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2020-12.11

Murstein, Bernard I. “Stimulus. Value. Role: A Theory of Marital Choice.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 32, no. 3 (August 1970): 481. https://doi.org/10.2307/350113.

Poushter, Jacob, and Janell Fetterolf. “Views of the Role of Religion by Country.” Pew Research Center, April 2019.

Pramadiningtyas, Ketut Dewi. “KEPUTUSAN SEORANG PEREMPUAN MELAKUKAN KONVERSI AGAMA: SEBUAH ANALISIS KONSTRUKSIONISME SOSIAL (LIFE HISTORY RAHMA).” CALYPTRA 6, no. 2 (2018): 1680–92.

Puspitorini, Erna, and Rifqi Awati Zahara. “Pemahaman Konsep Kafa’ah Dalam Pernikahan: Studi Kasus Di Desa Ngreco, Kecamatan Kandat, Kabupaten Kediri.” In Indonesian Proceedings and Annual Conference of Islamic Law and Sharia Economic (IPACILSE), 13–18, 2021. https://prosiding.uit-lirboyo.ac.id/index.php/psh/article/view/338

Rosidin. “Problem Pelayanan Kependudukan Bagi Penganut Agama Marapu Di Sumba Barat, Nusa Tenggara Timur.” Penamas 29, no. 3 (2016): 661. https://penamas.kemenag.go.id/penamas/article/view/41

Salisbury, W Seward. “Religious Identification, Mixed Marriage and Conversion.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1969, 125–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/1385260

Seligman, Martin E. P. Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. . New York: Free Press, 2002.

Seo, Myengkyo. “Falling in Love and Changing Gods: Inter-Religious Marriage and Religious Conversion in Java, Indonesia.” Indonesia and the Malay World 41, no. 119 (March 2013): 76–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2012.750104.

Shandy, Premadha Novita. “Instruksi Presiden No. 14 Tahun 1967 Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kehidupan Budaya & Ekonomi Keturunan Tionghoa Di Pecinan Semarang, 1967-2002.” Universitas Diponegoro, 2014.

Sherina, Dessita Putri. “Konversi Agama Di Kalangan Etnis Tionghoa: Motivasi, Adaptasi Dan Konsekuensi.” Hayula: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies 4, no. 1 (2020): 19–40. https://doi.org/10.21009/004.01.02

Shofi, Muhammad Aminuddin. “Marriage and Religion: Dynamics of Religious Conversion in Marriage and The Advancement of Community Religious Life Perspective of Religious Psychology and Sociology (Study in Lumajang Regency): Marriage and Religion: Dinamika Konversi Agama Dalam Perkawi.” Dialog 44, no. 1 (2021): 51–66. https://doi.org/10.47655/dialog.v44i1.422

Sijabat, Riris, Alamsyah Taher, and Riris Sijabat. “Pernikahan Antar Agama (Studi Fenomenologi Pada Konversi Agama Karena Menikah Di Kecamatan Sidakalang, Sumatera Utara).” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FISIP Unsiyah 3, no. 1 (2010): 776–89.

Sudarsana, I Ketut. “Peranan Keluarga Hindu Dalam Mengantisipasi Perpindahan Agama.” INA-Rxiv Papers, January 2018.

Sukirno. “Diskriminasi Pemenuhan Hak Sipil Bagi Penganut Agama Lokal.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 1, no. 3 (2018): 231–39. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v1i3.231-239.

Tanggok, M. “Buddhist and Confucian Relations in Indonesia: Conflict over the Ownership, Name and Function of Chinese Temples (Kelenteng).” In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Recent Innovations, 2018.

Taylor, Jean Gelman. “The Chinese and the Early Centuries of Conversion to Islam in Indonesia.” Chinese Indonesians: Remembering, Distorting, Forgetting, 2005, 148–64.

Tholib. “Proses Pernikahan Keluarga Beda Agama Ditinjau Dari Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia.” IAIN SALATIGA, October 2020, 1–150.

Walgito, Bimo. Bimbingan Dan Konseling Perkawinan, 1984.

Zhang, Feng. “Confucian Foreign Policy Traditions in Chinese History.” Chinese Journal of International Politics 8, no. 2 (June 2015): 197–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pov004.

Zulkifli, L. Psikologi Perkembangan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2001.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Marriage as Culmination Rather than Cause: Religious Conversion among Ethnic Chinese in Belitung. (2025). Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 18(1), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2025.18105

Similar Articles

11-20 of 152

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.