Peer Review Process

Research articles submitted to this journal will undergo a double-blind peer-review process. All research articles are reviewed by at least two qualified experts. Reviewers provide valuable scholarly comments to improve the content of the manuscript.

Double-Blind Peer Review
In the review process, the authors and reviewers do not know each other.
Policy of Reviewers:

1. To provide comments and corrections to the manuscript
2. To make a summary of the complete assessment sheet
3. To provide clear suggestions or advice to the editor
4. If the reviewer recommends "acceptance" by the revision, describe clearly how the revisions should be made
5. If the reviewer recommends "reject" it must provide alternative journals or suggestion, so the prospect of "resubmission" or "submission" elsewhere will become possible

Several Parameters for Evaluating Manuscript:

1. Are the data and information on the manuscript new and original?
2. Does the manuscript contribute significantly to advancing science?
3. Has a similar material been published elsewhere?
4. Is the substance of the manuscript more suitable in other journals?
5. Is the reference current or up to date and completely mentioned in the manuscript?
6. Methods part of the manuscript aligned with the aim of the research?
7. The author presents the manuscript clearly and easy to read.
8. Are there any errors of fact and calculations?
9. Are tables on the manuscript present data clearly and concisely?
10. Are all necessary illustrations needed on the manuscript?
11. Is the abstract written concisely?
12. Can the title of the manuscript represent the content of the manuscript?
13. Is the grammar and spelling on the manuscript meet the standards?