359

Views

350

PDF Downloads

22

XML Views

Original article
Open Access

Mixed-Method Approach for Human Value Education in Inclusive Pre-Schools: Cultivating Peace to Mitigate Child Conflicts

Parwoto
,
Rudy Amir
,
Sri Rika Amriani. H
,
Syamsuardi
,
Herlina
Pages: 159-169
|
Published: Sep 30, 2023

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study evaluates the implementation development of the PNKT-BD (Integrated Human Values Education Based on a Culture of Peace) model in the inclusive preschool setting of TK Teratai UNM Makassar, employing a mixed-method approach blending qualitative and quantitative research methodologies. The objectives were to integrate human values education into preschool activities, assessing its effectiveness in fostering a peaceful and inclusive environment. The study commenced with a needs assessment, revealing a high demand among teachers and parents for the PNKT-BD model despite challenges such as limited learning facilities. The model's development involved creating educational tools and conducting trials to evaluate their effectiveness. The model's validity, reliability, and practicality were assessed quantitatively, showing positive outcomes. Teachers played a key role as facilitators, promoting peaceful attitudes and inclusivity, supported by appropriate facilities. The findings suggest the PNKT-BD model is a viable approach for integrating human values in early childhood education, with potential applicability in various regions. The research also found that implementing the PNKT-BD model markedly improved children's social skills and conflict-resolution abilities. It was also observed that there was a significant increase in the inclusiveness and empathy displayed by children, both towards their peers and in the overall classroom environment. However, the study's focus on a single institution and reliance on self-reported data indicate the need for further research in diverse settings. The study underscores the importance of teacher training and resource development for the model's broader adoption.

Keywords:

Character Education Human Values Integrated Education Culture of Peace Inclusive Pre-School

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Introduction

The critical role of peace education in shaping contemporary society, particularly within inclusive preschool settings, is increasingly recognized as essential in an era characterized by global conflicts and societal divisions. Education's role in cultivating a culture of peace and understanding goes beyond traditional academic boundaries, significantly contributing to the holistic development of young minds and addressing broader societal challenges. It equips children with crucial conflict navigation and mitigation tools, fostering a more peaceful and cooperative global community. The significance of this topic encompasses educational disciplines, societal norms, and urgent global needs, calling for a comprehensive and immediate response to this pressing issue.

Peace education empowers students to resolve conflicts creatively and non-violently, aiming to cultivate a harmonious quality of life(Zembylas & Loukaides, 2021). In today's world of violence, educational and religious institutions must address this issue(Aguiar, 2021)(Buchori et al., 2021). This paradigm is acknowledged globally, emphasizing the importance of peace education in shaping a secure and prosperous future by equipping students with knowledge, attitudes, and skills for valuing diversity and human dignity(Isac et al., 2022).

While peace education is practiced within schools, its effectiveness could be enhanced by incorporating elements like humor to stimulate constructive dialogue among diverse groups(Mishra et al., 2020). It is vital to understand multicultural awareness, which involves recognizing and integrating both majority and minority cultural groups, ensuring their unique identities are acknowledged(Corboz et al., 2019). The need for peace education arises from escalating human conflicts, as seen in Indonesia, where conflicts manifest due to varying social dynamics, ideologies, and politics (N. Oueijan, 2018).

The global recognition of peace education is vital for cultivating a secure future, especially in schools. It aims to provide future generations with the knowledge and skills necessary to embrace diversity and uphold human dignity(Zheng et al., 2017). As tensions increase due to differences in perspectives, the significance of peace education becomes even more evident. The community and other institutions must actively address this issue to prevent further escalation of conflicts(Alcalá et al., 2017).

Program development should incorporate conflict sensitivity throughout its lifecycle, from design to implementation and evaluation(Morehouse et al., 2020). In peacebuilding environments, it is crucial to address the root causes of conflict while laying the groundwork for sustainable peace(Blum & Rogger, 2021). Peace education initiatives, such as UNICEF's "Learning for Peace" program, highlight the significance of social services in mitigating conflict factors and promoting social integration(Veerman & Denessen, 2021).

As practiced at Insan Teladan School, human values education focuses on core values like truth, virtue, peace, compassion, and non-violence(Santoso et al., 2020). This approach aims to produce well-rounded students who excel academically and morally. Such values are not just confined to educational settings; they are significant in all life aspects and should be respected accordingly(Anggraeni et al., 2022)(Yigit, 2021). Peace education is a comprehensive global endeavor that emphasizes promoting peace-related knowledge and enhancing students' capacities for fostering positive attitudes and conflict resolution(Anggraeni et al., 2022). Understanding "peace" goes beyond the mere absence of conflict, representing a harmonious approach to conflict resolution(Leib & Ruppel, 2021). Schools are ideal platforms for imparting values that promote peaceful character, tolerance, and unity(Edwards et al., 2020). The United Nations emphasizes the link between child protection, development, and conflict prevention, highlighting the importance of addressing poverty and inequality to ensure children's well-being(Veerman & Denessen, 2021).

The primary objective of this research is to develop and assess the effectiveness of an integrated human values education model grounded in a culture of peace(Ilfiandra et al., 2022). This model aims to enhance children's social-emotional attitudes and behaviors in inclusive preschool education settings(Choles et al., 2022). This research is paramount as it addresses a notable gap in current educational practices. Educators often struggle to integrate human values into their curricula effectively. By emphasizing the intrinsic role of human values in education, the study underscores the importance of character development from an early age, ensuring these values are woven into every learning event (Lazăr et al., 2022). Moreover, the inclusivity of the research, involving a diverse range of stakeholders—from teachers and principals to children with varying developmental needs—provides a comprehensive viewpoint on the value and practicality of the proposed model(Zhang et al., 2022). By embedding ethical values into academic learning, the research aims to cultivate enhanced ethical behavior in children, setting the foundation for more principled future generations.

The research makes significant contributions to the realm of inclusive kindergarten education. Central to this is the development of the PNKT-BD model—a structured and validated guide designed to assist educators in systematically imparting integrated human values education(Magano et al., 2020). This model, grounded in empirical validation, ensures its effectiveness in fostering positive social-emotional attitudes and behaviors among preschool children(Slot et al., 2020). Moreover, the study outcomes serve as a valuable reference point for curriculum developers, facilitating the creation of themes and materials that resonate with a culture of peace. Recognizing the instrumental role of educators, the research equips teachers with the necessary tools and insights, bolstering their capacity to integrate human values into their pedagogical practices seamlessly(Choi & Lee, 2020). Furthermore, by encompassing a broad spectrum of stakeholders, the study empowers educators, parents, and children, fostering

.....

Article Details

How to Cite

Parwoto, Amir, R., Amriani. H, S. R., Syamsuardi, & Herlina. (2023). Mixed-Method Approach for Human Value Education in Inclusive Pre-Schools: Cultivating Peace to Mitigate Child Conflicts. Golden Age: Jurnal Ilmiah Tumbuh Kembang Anak Usia Dini, 8(3), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.14421/jga.2023.83-05

References

Aguiar, J. (2021). Exploring Betty A. Reardon’s perspective on peace education: Looking back, looking forward. Journal of Peace Education, 18(2), 233–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2020.1847975

Albahusain, W. (2022). A Co-Teaching Training Program’s Impact on Female Student Teachers: Department of Special Education, King Saud University. SAGE Open, 12(1), 21582440221079883. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079883

Alcalá, H. E., Sharif, M. Z., & Samari, G. (2017). Social Determinants of Health, Violent Radicalization, and Terrorism: A Public Health Perspective. Health Equity, 1(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2016.0016

Anggraeni, L., Affandi, I., Wahyudin, D., Paramitha, S. T., & Ramadhan, M. G. (2022). Use of Game Learning As a Platform for the Concept of Peace EducationOptimization of the Board Game as a Platform for the Concept of Peace Education: A Survey Method Study. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10(2), 494–511. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2292

Azila-Gbettor, E. M., Abiemo, M. K., & Glate, S. N. (2023). University support and online learning engagement during the Covid-19 period: The role of student vitality. Heliyon, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12832

Baan, A., Girik Allo, M. D., & Patak, A. A. (2022). The cultural attitudes of a funeral ritual discourse in the indigenous Torajan, Indonesia. Heliyon, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08925

Blazhenkova, O., & Booth, R. W. (2020). Individual differences in visualization and childhood play preferences. Heliyon, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03953

Blum, J. R., & Rogger, D. (2021). Public Service Reform in Post-Conflict Societies. The World Bank Research Observer, 36(2), 260–287. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkaa007

Buchori, S., Kartadinata, S., Yusuf, S., Ilfiandra, I., Fakhri, N., & Adiputra, S. (2021). Developing a Framework Peace Education for Primary School Teachers in Indonesia. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(8), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.8.14

Cahyo Adi Kistoro, H., Setiawan, C., Latipah, E., & Putranta, H. (2021). Teacher’s experiences in character education for autistic children. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20743

Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Choi, S., & Lee, S. W. (2020). Enhancing Teacher Self-Efficacy in Multicultural Classrooms and School Climate: The Role of Professional Development in Multicultural Education in the United States and South Korea. AERA Open, 6(4), 2332858420973574. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420973574

Choles, J. R., Roeser, R. W., & Mashburn, A. J. (2022). Extensions beyond program impacts: Conceptual and methodological considerations in studying the implementation of a preschool social emotional learning program. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2022.1035730

Corboz, J., Siddiq, W., Hemat, O., Chirwa, E. D., & Jewkes, R. (2019). What works to prevent violence against children in Afghanistan? Findings of an interrupted time series evaluation of a school-based peace education and community social norms change intervention in Afghanistan. PLOS ONE, 14(8), e0220614. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220614

Durdukoca, Ş. F. (2021). Reviewing of Teachers’ Professional Competencies for Inclusive Education. International Education Studies. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n10p1

Edwards, D. B., Sustarsic, M., Chiba, M., McCormick, M., Goo, M., & Perriton, S. (2020). Achieving and Monitoring Education for Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Sustainability, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041383

Fan, R.-J. D., & Tan, P. J. (2019). Application of Information Technology in Preschool Aesthetic Teaching from the Perspective of Sustainable Management. Sustainability, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072179

Ilfiandra, I., Nadhirah, N. A., Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia, nadia.aulia.nadhirah@upi.edu, Suryana, D., Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia, dodisuryana@upi.edu, Ahmad, A. B., & Universitas Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia, aslina.ahmad@fpm.upsi.edu.my. (2022). Development and Validation Peaceful Classroom Scale: Rasch Model Analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15427a

Isac, M. M., Sass, W., Pauw, J. B., De Maeyer, S., Schelfhout, W., Van Petegem, P., & Claes, E. (2022). Differences in Teachers’ Professional Action Competence in Education for Sustainable Development: The Importance of Teacher Co-Learning. Sustainability, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020767

Joubert, R., & Harrington, I. (2019). Inclusive Education: Origins, ‘Defectology’, and Kosovo’s Experiences of Inclusive Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p52

Kim, S., Lin, T.-J., Chen, J., Logan, J., Purtell, K. M., & Justice, L. M. (2020). Influence of Teachers’ Grouping Strategies on Children’s Peer Social Experiences in Early Elementary Classrooms. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.587170

Lazăr, A., Sîrbu, I., Barth, K., Bacter, C., & Hatos, A. (2022). Generosity and Environmental Protection: How Strong Is the Relationship between Giving and Sustainability? Sustainability, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020869

Leib, J., & Ruppel, S. (2021). The Dance of Peace and Justice: Local Perceptions of International Peacebuilding in West Africa. International Peacekeeping, 28(5), 783–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2021.1927726

Magano, J., Silva, C., Figueiredo, C., Vitória, A., Nogueira, T., & Pimenta Dinis, M. A. (2020). Generation Z: Fitting Project Management Soft Skills Competencies—A Mixed-Method Approach. Education Sciences, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10070187

Mee Mee, R. W., Pek, L. S., Von, W. Y., Abd Ghani, K., Tengku Shahdan, T. S., Ismail, M. R., & Rao, Y. S. (2021). A Conceptual Model of Analogue Gamification to Enhance Learners’ Motivation and Attitude. International Journal of Language Education; Vol. 5, No. 2, 2021. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i2.18229

Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Guiding principles and practices of peace education followed in secondary schools of Mizoram. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(4), 1096. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20738

Morehouse, A. T., Hughes, C., Manners, N., Bectell, J., & Bruder, T. (2020). Carnivores and Communities: A Case Study of Human-Carnivore Conflict Mitigation in Southwestern Alberta. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2020.00002

N. Oueijan, H. (2018). Educating for Peace in Higher Education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(9), 1916–1920. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060909

Santoso, F. P., Mulyoto, M., Djono, D., & Hanif, M. (2020). Inculcating Character Values to the Student of Polytechnic ATMI Surakarta Vocational School. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3D), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081712

Schwartz, A., & Takševa, T. (2020). Between Trauma and Resilience. Aspasia, 14(1), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.3167/asp.2020.140109

Slot, P. L., Bleses, D., & Jensen, P. (2020). Infants’ and Toddlers’ Language, Math and Socio-Emotional Development: Evidence for Reciprocal Relations and Differential Gender and Age Effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580297

Smith, L. E., Gosselin, V., Collins, P., & Frohlich, K. L. (2022). A Tale of Two Cities: Unpacking the Success and Failure of School Street Interventions in Two Canadian Cities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811555

Su, J., Zhang, F., Chen, S., Zhang, N., Wang, H., & Jian, J. (2021). Member Selection for the Collaborative New Product Innovation Teams Integrating Individual and Collaborative Attributions. Complexity, 2021, 8897784. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8897784

Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Sekiguchi, A., Nouchi, R., Kotozaki, Y., Nakagawa, S., Miyauchi, C. M., Iizuka, K., Yokoyama, R., Shinada, T., Yamamoto, Y., Hanawa, S., Araki, T., Hashizume, H., Kunitoki, K., Sassa, Y., & Kawashima, R. (2016). Differences in gray matter structure correlated to nationalism and patriotism. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 29912. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29912

Teppo, M., Soobard, R., & Rannikmäe, M. (2021). A Study Comparing Intrinsic Motivation and Opinions on Learning Science (Grades 6) and Taking the International PISA Test (Grade 9). Education Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010014

Uaidullakyzy, E., Gulnara, R., Khalima, S., Zeinep, B., Turmanov, R., & Rysbayeva, G. (2022). Creating Integration Situations of Students’ Computer Lesson and Learning with Gamification. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(19), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i19.32177

Veerman, G.-J., & Denessen, E. (2021). Social cohesion in schools: A non-systematic review of its conceptualization and instruments. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1940633. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1940633

Xia, T., Kang, M., Chen, M., Ouyang, J., & Hu, F. (2021). Design Training and Creativity: Students Develop Stronger Divergent but Not Convergent Thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.695002

Yigit, M. F. (2021). Citizenship and human rights within the scope of values education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(3), 282–291. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/809

Zaric, N., Lukarov, V., & Schroder, U. (2020). A Fundamental Study for Gamification Design: Exploring Learning Tendencies’ Effects. International Journal of Serious Games, 7(4), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v7i4.356

Zembylas, M., & Loukaides, L. (2021). Teachers’ strategies of everyday diplomacy in peace education: A case study of the “infrapolitics” of peacebuilding in Greek-Cypriot schools. Research in Comparative and International Education, 16(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499921991649

Zhang, L., Wu, T., Liu, L., Ren, P., & Lin, C. (2022). The relationship between Chinese preschool principal leadership styles and teacher leadership: Exploring the mediating effect of psychological capital. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1006184

Zheng, Q., Xu, A., & Kong, D. (2017). Environmental Education, Knowledge Management and Professional Performance in eco-tourism: The Impact relatedness. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00958a