Abraham’s Sacrifice in the Qur’an and the Bible: Comparative Hermeneutics of Narrative, Meaning, and Textual Authority
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v27i1.6336Keywords:
exegesis, comparative hermeneutics, Abraham's sacrifice, Qur'an, BibleAbstract
This study examines the long-standing theological and exegetical debate over the identity of the intended sacrificial son in the story of Abraham’s sacrifice—Isaac or Ishmael— and its implications for interreligious relations. The study departs from the observation that much of the existing scholarship on Q. 37:99-113 and Genesis 22 is shaped by polemical and identity-driven readings that privilege communal supremacy and scriptural integrity, while common ethical interpretations are often neglected. Methodologically, this article employs a comparative hermeneutic that juxtaposes classical and contemporary Qur’anic exegesis with Jewish and Christian interpretations of the Aqedah. By tracing the diachronic development of Muslim, Jewish, and Christian exegetical traditions, the study identifies both the points of contestation and the areas of convergence in reading Abraham’s sacrifice. The article argues that, despite enduring disagreements regarding whether Isaac or Ishmael was the intended sacrifice, the three traditions share at least two major theological and ethical commitments: Abraham’s unwavering faith and obedience to God, and a principled rejection of human sacrifice as incompatible with divine justice. These shared principles acquire renewed significance in the context of ongoing religiously motivated conflicts, where sacred narratives are frequently mobilized to legitimize violence. By foregrounding a harmonious and ethically oriented reading of Abraham’s sacrifice, this study contributes to Qur’anic studies, comparative scripture, and interfaith dialogue. It suggests that the narrative can serve as a theological resource for peacebuilding and interreligious solidarity, while future research may further explore its application in peace education and liturgical practices.
References
Abdel Haleem, M. A., ed. The Qurʼan. Oxford World’s Classics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Afsar, Ayaz. “A Comparative Study of the Intended Sacrifice of Isaac and Ismael in the Bible and the Qur’an.” Journal of Islamic Studies 46, no. 4 (2007): 483–98. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20839091.
Andi, Azhari, and Hamdi Putra Ahmad. “Before Orthodoxy; The Story of Abraham’s Sacrifice (Dzabīh) in Early Muslim Commentaries.” International Journal of Islamic Khazanah 14, no. 1 (2024): 1–12.
’Ashūr, Muhammad al-Tāhir ibn. Al-Tahrīr Wa al-Tanwīr. Vol. 23. Tunis: Dar Tunisiyah, 2008.
Baghawī, Abū Muhammad al-Hussein ibn Mas’ūd al-. Ma’ālim al-Tanzīl. Riyād: Dār al-Taibah, 1989.
Barlas, Asma. “Abraham’s Sacrifice in the Qur’an: Beyond the Body.” Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis 23 (January 2011): 55–71. https://doi.org/10.30674/scripta.67380.
Clooney, Francis X. Comparative Theology: Deep Learning across Religious Borders. Malden, Mass: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
Daly, Robert J. “The Soteriological Significance Of The Sacrifice Of Isaac.” Catholic Biblical Association 39, no. 1 (January 1977): 45–75. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43714225.
Davies, P.R., and B.D Chilton. “The Aqedah: A Revised Tradition History.” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 40, no. 4 (October 1978): 514–46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43715037.
Douay-Rheims Verison. The Holy Bible; Translated from The Latin Vulgate Diligently Compared With The Hebrew, Greek, and Other Editions In Divers Languages. 1609.
Firestone, Reuven. “Abraham’s Son as The Intended Sacrifice (Al-Dhabīḥ, Qur’ān 37: 99–113) : Issues in Qur’ānic Exegesis.” Journal of Semitic Studies XXXIV, no. 1 (1989): 95–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/XXXIV.1.95.
Ghanī, Hassan Abd al-. Tafsīr Ibn Juraij. Cairo: Maktabah al-Turāts al-Islāmī, 1413.
Hamka. Tafsir Al-Azhar. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2015.
Hayward. Targums and the Transmission of Scripture into Judaism and Christianity. BRILL, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004179561.i-432.
Hayward, C.T. Robert. “The Sacrifice Of Isaac And Jewish Polemic Against Christianity.” In Targums and the Transmission of Scripture into Judaism and Christianity, 72–87. Leiden: Brill, 2010.
ī, Muhammad Hussein al-Tabātabā’. Al-Mīzān Fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān. Vol. 17. Beirut: Muassasah al-A’lamī li al-Matbū’āt, 1417.
Ibn Hazm, Abu Muhammad ‘Ali bin Ahmad. Al-Fasl Fi al-Milal Wa al-Ahwai Fi al-Nihal. Edited by M.I Nasr and A. Umayra. Vol. 5. Beirut: Dar al-Jil, 1982.
Ibn Taimiyah. Majmū’ah al-Fatawā. 4 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Wafā’, 2005.
“Kalimah Sawā’; A Common Word Between Us and You.” The Royal Aal al-Bayt Institute for Islamic Thought, 2009.
https://www.acommonword.com/downloads/CW-Booklet-Final-v6_8-1-09.pdf.
Kathīr, Abū al-Fidā’ Ismā’īl ibn ’Umar ibn. Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān al-’Azim. Vol. 7. Riyad: Dār al-Thayyibah, 1999.
Mirza, Younus Y. “Ishmael as Abraham’s Sacrifice: Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Kathīr on the Intended Victim.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 24, no. 3 (July 2013): 277–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2013.786339.
Nahdi, Saleh A. Yang Disembelih Ishaq Atau Isma’il? Jakarta: Arista Brahmatyasa, 1993.
Oh, Abraham. “Canonical Understanding of the Sacrifice of Isaac: The Influence of the Jewish Tradition.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 72, no. 3 (April 2016): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v72i3.3000.
Pope Paul VI. Declaration on The Relation of The Church to Non-Christian Religions; Nostra Aetate. October 28, 1965. https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_nostra-aetate_en.html#.
Quṭb, Sayyid. Fī Zhilāl Al-Qur’ān. Vols. 19–25. Cairo: Dār al-Shurūq, 2003.
Rahmatullah, Rahmatullah. “Hermeneutika Intertekstualitas Muqâtil Bin Sulaymân.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 20, no. 2 (November 2019): 126–42. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2019.2002-01.
Saleh, Walid. The Formation of the Classical Tafsīr Tradition: The Qurʾān Commentary of al-Thaʿlabī (d. 427/1035). Leiden: BRILL, 2004.
Samarqandī, Abū Laith Nasr ibn Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn Ibrāhīm al-. Tafsīr Al-Samarqandī; Bahr al-’Ulūm. Edited by Ali Muhammad Mu’awwid, Adil Ahmad Abd al-Maujud, and Zakaria Abd al-Majid al-Nawti. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1413.
Sharbāṣī, Ahmad al-. “Min Khaṣā’iṣ al-Qiṣṣah Fī-Qur’ān al-Karīm.” Tafsir Center for Qur’anic Studies, n.d. Accessed July 10, 2025. https://tafsir.net/article/5196.pdf.
Sherwood, Y. “Binding-Unbinding: Divided Responses of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam to the ‘Sacrifice’ of Abraham’s Beloved Son.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 72, no. 4 (December 2004): 821–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfh081.
Shihab, Muhammad Quraish. Tafsir Al-Misbah; Pesan-Kesan dan Keserasian al-Qur’an. Vol. 10. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2012.
Sirry, Mun’im. Islam Revisionis; Kontestasi Agama Zaman Radikal. Yogyakarta: Suka Press, 2018.
Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. Towards a World Theology: Faith and the Comparative History of Religion. Library of Philosophy and Religion. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan, 1989.
Sulaimān, Muqātil Ibn. Al-Tafsīr al-Kabīr. Edited by Abdullah Mahmud Shahatah. Vol. 2. Beirut: Muassasah al-Tarikh al-’Arabiy, 1423.
Thabari, Abu Ja’far Muhammad ibn Jarir al-. Jami Al-Bayan ’an Ta’wil Ay al-Qur’an. 6 vols. Cairo: Markaz al-Buhuts wa al-Dirasat al-’Arabiyyah wa al-Islamiyyah, 1422.
“The Firstborn Son in Jewish Society.” In The Firstborn Son in Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity, by Kyu Seop Kim, 27–63. BRILL, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004394940_003.
“Toward a Comparative Feminist Theology.” In A Companion to Comparative Theology, by Jerusha Tanner Rhodes, 505–16. BRILL, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004388390_028.
Vigour, Cécile. Readings in Methodology: African Perspectives. Edited by Jean-Bernard Ouédraogo, Carlos Cardoso, and Codesria. Codesria Book Series. Dakar: Codesria, 2011.
Weddle, David L. Sacrifice in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. New York: New York University Press, 2018.
Willerslev, Rane. “God on Trial: Human Sacrifice, Trickery, and Faith.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3, no. 1 (March 2013): 140–54. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.1.009.
Yazicioglu, Isra. “Engaging with Abraham and His Knife: Interpretation of Abraham’s Sacrifice in the Muslim Tradition.” In Interpreting Abraham: Journeys to Moriah. Fortress Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt22nm9ng.7.
Yūsuf, Muhammad “Athā.” Tafsīr Al-Suddī al-Kabīr. Beirut: Dar al-Wafa, 1414.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Azhari Andi, Moch. Taufiq Ridho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Publishing your paper with Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis means that the author or authors retain the copyright in the paper. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis uses license CC-BY-NC-ND or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly works. This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, translate, transform or build upon the material you may use it for private use only and not for distribution. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis granted an exclusive non-commercial reuse license by the author(s), but the author(s) are able to put the paper onto a website, distribute it to colleagues, give it to students, use it in your thesis, etc, so long as the use is not directed at a commercial advantage or toward private monetary gain. The author(s) can reuse the figures and tables and other information contained in their paper published by Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis in future papers or work without having to ask anyone for permission, provided that the figures, tables, or other information that is included in the new paper or work properly references the published paper as the source of the figures, tables or other information, and the new paper or work is not direct at a private monetary gain or commercial advantage.
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis journal Open Acces articles are distrubuted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Article can be read, copy and redistribute the material ini any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
