Rhetorical Coherence and Eco-Theological Meaning in Qur’anic Water Verses: A Disciplined Semitic Rhetorical Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v27i1.6716Keywords:
Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA), Qur’anic coherence, eco-theology, Qur’anic Water Verse, Rhetorical structureAbstract
Too often, eco-theological readings of Qur’anic water verses outrun the text—because structural claims are made without a disciplined, transparent, and auditable method. This article examines whether Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA) can serve as an audit-able tool for reading Qur’anic water passages in a way that disciplines ecological inference. Focusing on Q 23:18–19 and Q 25:48–49, it asks how rhetorical segmentation and parallelism clarify the internal logic of the verses beyond atomistic citation. Using qualitative library-based research, the study applies Meynet’s SRA procedure (segmenting the text, identifying correspondences, and mapping inter-unit relations) and then compares the resulting structure with thematic Qur’anic-ecological readings on water, balance (mīzān), and stewardship (khalīfah). The analysis shows that SRA makes visible a coherent argumentative sequence—sending down water, settling it, and directing its benefits—that frames water as an entrusted measure rather than a merely descriptive sign. It also constrains interpretive overreach by requiring each ecological claim to be traceable to a demonstrable textual relation, while still supporting an ethic of restraint and care. Overall, the article indicates that rhetorical-structural analysis can strengthen eco-tafsīr by providing a replicable pathway from textual structure to ethical inference.
References
Al-Alūsī. Rūḥ Al-Ma‘ānī. Vol. 10. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1994.
Asnawi, Aqdi Rofiq, Husein Aziz, and Achmad Murtafi Haris. “Investigating Cohesiveness of QS. Al-Mā’idah: A Review on Michel Cuypers Implementation of Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA).” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 23, no. 1 (March 2022): 1. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2022.2301-03.
Attfield, Robin. Environmental Ethics: An Overview for the Twenty-First Century. 2. ed., Fully rev. and Expanded. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014.
Bashir, Kamran. “Revisiting Modern Naẓm Approaches to the Qur’an: Iṣlāḥī’s Interpretation of Q. 107 and Q. 108 in His Tadabbur-i Qurʾān.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 17, no. 2 (June 2015): 47–74. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2015.0195.
Blankinship, Lisa A., Sarah Gillaspie, Khaled Obaideen, and Basil H. Aboul-Enein. “‘… And We Have Made from Water Every Living Thing’: Water Conservation and the Holy Qur’an.” Environmental Conservation 51, no. 2 (June 2024): 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S037689292300036X.
Boullata, Issa J. “Sayyid Qutb’s Literary Appreciation of the Qur’an.” In Literary Structures of Religious Meaning in the Qu’ran, 354–71. London: Routledge, 2000.
Cuypers, Michel. A Qur’anic Apocalypse: A Reading of the Thirty-Three Last Sūrahs of the Qur’an. Translated by Jerry Ryan. no. 1. Atlanta: Lockwood Press, 2018.
———. “And Yet It Moves: Reflections on an Essay by Nicolai Sinai.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 22, no. 2 (2020): 86–104.
———. “Semitic Rhetoric as a Key to the Question of the Naẓm of the Qur’anic Text.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 13, no. 1 (April 2011): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2011.0003.
———. The Banquet: A Reading of the Fifth Sura of the Qur’an. Translated by Patricia Kelly. Miami: Convivium Press, 2008.
———. The Composition of the Qur’an. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.
Cuypers, Michel, and A.H. Mathias Zahniser. The Composition of Sūrat Maryam: Rhetorical Analysis. Taylor and Francis, 2024. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003517801.
Eser, K. “An Example of Anachronism: Relating Verse 205 of Sūrah al-Baqara and Verse 41 of Surah al-Rūm to Environmental Problems.” Ankara Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi 65, no. 1 (2024): 149–90. https://doi.org/10.33227/auifd.1352314.
Foltz, Richard C. “Islam.” In The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Ecology, edited by Roger S. Gottlieb, 207–19. Oxford University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178722.003.0009.
Grim, John, and Mary Evelyn Tucker. Ecology and Religion. Washington: Island Press, 2014.
Haleem, M.A.S. Abdel. The Qurʼan: A New Translation. Oxford World’s Classics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Hanifah, Annisa Nur, Belqes Al Sowaidi, and Andri Nirwana An. “Reinterpretation of the Words Falyanzur and Tha’am in Qs ’Abasa Verse 24 to Build Public Nutrition Awareness.” QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies 4, no. 1 (January 2025): 109–24. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i1.7321.
Ibn ‘Āshūr. Al-Taḥrīr Wa al-Tanwīr. Vol. 19. Tunis: Al-Dār al-Tūnisiyyah lī al-Nashr, 2008.
Ibn Kathīr. Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm. 2nd ed. Vol. 5. Riyadh: Dār al-Ṭayyibah, 1999.
Khalid, Fazlun M. “Islam and The Environment.” In Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change, edited by Robert Edward Munn and Peter Timmerman, 5:332–39. Social and Economic Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. Chichester: J. Wiley & sons, 2002.
Klar, Marianna. “Structural Dividers in the Qur’an: Preliminary Remarks and Suggestions for Supplementary Reading.” In Structural Dividers in the Qur’an, 1–23. New York: Routledge, 2020.
Mathias Zahniser, A. H. “The Word of God and the Apostleship of ’Īsā: A Narrative Analysis of Āl ’Imrān {3}: 33-62.” Journal of Semitic Studies XXXVI, no. 1 (1991): 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/XXXVI.1.77.
Matthias, Zahniser. “Major Transitions and Thematic Borders in Two Long Sūras: Al-Baqara and al-Nisa’.” In Literary Structures of Religious Meaning, edited by Issa Boullata, 22–55. Richmond: Curzon Press, 2000.
Meynet, Roland. Treatise on Biblical Rhetoric. Translated by Leo Arnold. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2012.
Mir, Mustansir. Coherence in the Qurʾān: A Study of Iṣlāḥī’s Concept of Naẓm in Tadabbur-i Qurʾān. Indianapolis, IN: American Trust Publ, 1986.
Mokrani, Adnane. “Semitic Rhetoric and the Qur’ān: The Scholarship of Michel Cuypers.” In New Trends in Qur’anic Studies: Text, Context, and Interpretation, by Mun’im Sirry, 61–81. Atlanta, Georgia: Lockwood Press, 2019.
Muhamad, A., A.H. Syihab, and M. Achour. “Quranic Messages on Environmental Sustainability: An Expository Study of Its Relevance.” AlBayan 17, no. 1 (2019): 38–59. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-12340069.
Mustaqim, Abdul. Tafsir Ekologi: Relasi Eko-Teologis Tuhan, Manusia, Dan Alam. Mojokerto: Damai Banawa Semesta, 2024.
Najjār, Zaghlūl al-. Tafsīr Al-Āyāt al-Kawniyyah Fī al-Qur’ān al-Karīm. 1st ed. Vol. 2. Cairo: Maktabatu al-Syurūq al-Dauliyyah, 2007.
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. “God Is Absolute Reality and All Creation His Tajallī (Theophany).” In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Religion and Ecology, 1–11. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118465523.ch1.
———. Religion & the Order of Nature: The 1994 Cadbury Lectures at the University of Birmingham. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Nazirul Islam Sarker, M., M. Lamiur Raihan, M. Enamul Huq, M.M. Kamruzzaman, T. Chumky, and T. Hattori. “Ways of Water Management in Islam: Potential Insights for Future Water Governance.” In Indigenous and Local Water Knowl., Values and Practices, 47–65. Springer Nature, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9406-7_4.
Neuwirth, Angelika. “Qur’an and History — a Disputed Relationship: Some Reflections on Qur’anic History and History in the Qur’an.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 5, no. 1 (2003): 1–18.
———. Studien zur Komposition der mekkanischen Suren. 2nd ed. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110920383.
Ouis, Soumaya Pernilla. “Islamic Ecotheology Based on the Qur’ān.” Islamic Studies 37, no. 2 (1998): 151–81.
Özdemir, İbrahim. “Towards an Understanding of Environmental Ethics from a Qur’anic Perspective.” In Islam and Ecology: A Bestowed Trust, edited by Richard C. Foltz, Frederick M. Denny, and Azizan Baharuddin. Cambridge, Mass: Center for the Study of World Religions, Harvard Divinity School, 2003.
Quṭb, Sayyid. Fī Ẓilāl Al-Qur’ān. 32nd ed. Vol. 4. Cairo: Dār al-Shurūq, 2003.
Raymond, Farrin. Structure and Qur’anic Interpretation: A Study of Symmetry and Coherence in Islam’s Holy Text. Ashland, Oregon: White Cloud Press, 2014.
Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn al-. Mafātiḥ Al-Ghayb. Vol. 23. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabiy, 1420.
———. Mafātiḥ Al-Ghayb. Vol. 24. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabiy, 1420.
Reda, Nevin. “Structure and Organization of the Qur’an.” In The Routledge Companion to the Qur’an, 1st ed., edited by George Archer, Maria M. Dakake, and Daniel A. Madigan, 165–76. New York: Routledge, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315885360-18.
———. “The Poetics of Sūrat Āl ʿImrān’s Narrative Structure (Q 3).” In Structural Dividers in the Qur’an, edited by Marianna Klar. London: Routledge, 2020.
Robinson, Neal. Discovering the Qur’an: A Contemporary Approach to a Veiled Text. London: SCM Press, 1996.
———. “Hands Outstretched: Towards a Re-Reading of Sūrat al-Māʾida.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 3, no. 1 (2001): 1.
Sinai, Nicolai. “Review Essay: ‘Going Round in Circles’: Michel Cuypers, The Composition of the Qur’an: Rhetorical Analysis, and Raymond Farrin, Structure and Qur’anic Interpretation: A Study of Symmetry and Coherence in Islam’s Holy Text.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 19, no. 2 (June 2017): 2. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2017.0285.
Taylor, Paul W. Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press, 2011.
Wild, Stefan. “Unity and Coherence in the Qur’ān.” In Exegetical Crossroads: Understanding Scripture in Judaism, Christianity and Islam in the Pre-Modern Orient, edited by Georges Tamer, Regina Grundmann, Assaad Elias Kattan, and Karl Pinggéra, 303–18. De Gruyter, 2017.
Zahniser, A. H. Mathias. “The Miraculous Birth Stories in the Interpretation of Sūrat Maryam (Q 19): An Exercise in a Discourse Grammar of the Qur’an.” In Structural Dividers in the Qur’an, edited by Marianna Klar, 92–139. Routledge, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aqdi Rofiq Asnawi, Mahmud Rifaannudin, Deki Ridho Adi Anggara, Oky Ayu Agustin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Publishing your paper with Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis means that the author or authors retain the copyright in the paper. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis uses license CC-BY-NC-ND or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly works. This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, translate, transform or build upon the material you may use it for private use only and not for distribution. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis granted an exclusive non-commercial reuse license by the author(s), but the author(s) are able to put the paper onto a website, distribute it to colleagues, give it to students, use it in your thesis, etc, so long as the use is not directed at a commercial advantage or toward private monetary gain. The author(s) can reuse the figures and tables and other information contained in their paper published by Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis in future papers or work without having to ask anyone for permission, provided that the figures, tables, or other information that is included in the new paper or work properly references the published paper as the source of the figures, tables or other information, and the new paper or work is not direct at a private monetary gain or commercial advantage.
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis journal Open Acces articles are distrubuted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Article can be read, copy and redistribute the material ini any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
