Expounding Al-Bukhārī’s Theological Debates on Hadith Pertaining to Bayt Al-Maqdis from His Tarājim Abwāb

Main Article Content

Najah Nadiah Amran
Burhan Che Daud
Muhammad Akmaluddin

Abstract

Some researchers claim that Muslim scholars do not emphasize the importance of Bayt al-Maqdis as strongly as they do upon the two holy cities of Islam, Makkah and Madinah. Even when they do, their writings are mixed with weak and forged narrations. Additionally, their efforts aimed to strengthen the political position of certain caliphs. In the current regional situation, some Muslims radically and literally interpret the hadith out of context to support the liberation of Bayt al-Maqdis. They believe that participating in jihadi group is a noble effort, even if it involves suicide bombings. Based on these issues, this article explores the efforts of scholars in hadith scholarship related to Bayt al-Maqdis. Specifically, it examines the perspective of a prominent hadith scholar, Imam al-Bukhari, in his initiative to compile hadiths, which he placed in different chapters of his book al-Jāmi’ al-aḥīḥ. This study employs a library research approach involving content analysis. The findings of this study reveal that numerous Muslim scholars have contributed significantly to Islamic scholarship in Bayt al-Maqdis through writing and the dissemination of knowledge. Specifically, they compiled hadiths about Bayt al-Maqdis in certain books and chapters. Imam al-Bukhari documented 12 narrations related to Bayt al-Maqdis in 9 books and 13 chapters. This study selected one hadith that is almost identical but is placed under four different chapters. This illustrates the unique way a single narration, both textually and contextually, can explain the significance and position of Bayt al-Maqdis in Islam from diverse and interesting perspectives. This study recommends continuing the exploration of hadiths related to Bayt al-Maqdis to examine various other forms of Tarājim. This will help the Muslim community, in particular, to understand the hadith texts comprehensively while simultaneously refuting the argument that Islam neglects this third holy city.

Article Details

How to Cite
Amran, Najah Nadiah, Burhan Che Daud, and Muhammad Akmaluddin. “Expounding Al-Bukhārī’s Theological Debates on Hadith Pertaining to Bayt Al-Maqdis from His Tarājim Abwāb”. ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 25, no. 1 (July 18, 2024): 99–112. Accessed February 23, 2025. https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/ushuluddin/esensia/article/view/5606.
Section
Articles

References

Abu-halabiyah, Ahmad. “تخريج أحاديث فضائل بيت المقدس والمسجد الأقصى / Hadith Authentication on The virtues of Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa Mosque.” Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies 1, no. 2 (1998): 51–94.

Al-‘Ainī, Badr al-Dīn Abū Muḥammad Maḥmūd ibn Aḥmad. ‘Umdat al-Qārī Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. 4. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 2001.

Al-‘Asqalānī, Aḥmad ibn ‘Alī Ibn Ḥajar. Fatḥ al-Bārī Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Riyad: Dar al-Salam, 1997.

———. Tahdhīb al-Tahdhīb. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah, 2001.

Al-A’zami, Muhammad Mustafa. Studies in Early Hadith Literature. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust, 2000.

———. Studies in Hadith Methodology and Literature. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust, 1992.

Al-Bukhārī, Muḥammad ibn Ismā’īl. Al-Adab al-Mufrad. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1985.

———. Kitāb Tārīkh al-Kabīr. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 2001.

———. Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1981.

Al-Dhahabī, Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn Uthmān. Siyar A‘lām al-Nubalā.’ Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah, 2001.

———. Tahdhīb Siyar A‘lām al-Nubalā.’ Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah, 1992.

Al-Qaraḍāwī, Yūsuf. “Al-Quds fī al-Waʻy al-Islāmī.” Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies 1, no. 1 (1997): 7–17.

Al-Shamālī, Yāsir. Al-Wāḍiḥ fī Manāhij al-Muhaddithīn. Amman: Matba’ah al-Jammi’ah, 1998.

Al-Taḥḥān, Maḥmūd. Uṣūl al-Takhrīj wa Dirāsat al-Asānīd. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1997.

Amran, N.N. The Concept of Bayt Al-Maqdis in Hadith Literature: A Study of Al-Bukhari, Muslim and Abu Dawud’s Approaches and Understandings. (M.Lit Dissertation). University of Aberdeen, 2005.

Anees, Munawar Ahmad. Guide to Sira and Hadith Literature in the Western Language. London: Mansell Publishing Limited, 1986.

Duri, Abdul Aziz. “Jerusalem in the Early Islamic Period 7-11th centuries AD.” In Jerusalem in History, diedit oleh K.J. Asali. Essex: Scorpion Publishing, 2000.

Dzulraidi, Dzulfaidhi Hakimie, Norazam Khair Mohd Ithnin, Muhammad Taufiq Amat Famsir, dan Danial Hazim Ayub. “The Virtues of Bayt al-Maqdis According to The Quran and Hadith: Analysis of the Work Faḍā’il Bayt al-Maqdis by Ibn Al-Jawzī.” International Journal of Al-Quran and Knowledge 3, no. 2 (2023): 56–78.

El-Awaisi, Abd al-Fattah. “Islamic Jerusalem Studies: New Definitions.” In Winter Postgraduate Research Workshop, 2005.

———. “The Significance of Jerusalem in Islam: An Islamic Reference.” Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies 1, no. 2 (1998): 47–71.

Kāfī, Abū Bakr. Manhaj al-Imām al-Bukhārī fī Taṣḥīḥ al-Ahādīth wa Ta’līlīhā. Beirut: Dar Ibn Hazm, 2000.

Khalaf, Marwan Abu. “The Significance of Jerusalem to Muslims.” Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies 2, no. 2 (1999): 75–79.

Khalek, Nancy. “Jerusalem in Medieval Islamic Tradition.” Religion Compass 5, no. 10 (Oktober 4, 2011): 624–630.

Khan, Muhammad Muhsin. The Translation of the Meanings of Sahīh al-Bukhāri. Beirut: Dar al-’Arabiyah, 1985.

Khattab, Mustafa. The Clear Quran series with Arabic Texts: A Thematic English Translation. USA: Furqaan Institute of Quranic Education, 2016.

Nor, Mohd, dan Mohd Roslan. The Significance of Jerusalem in Islam. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press, 2017.

Ṣāliḥ, Ṣubḥī. ʻUlūm al-Hadīth wa Muṣṭalaḥuhu. Beirut: Dar al-’Ilm al-Malayin, 2000.

Shawqī, Abū Khalīl. Aṭlas al-Ahādīth al-Nabawiyyah min al-Kutub al-Ṣiḥāḥ al-Sittah. Damascus: Dar al-Fikr, 2003.

Siddiqi, Muhammad Zubayr. Hadith Literature Its Origin, Development and Special Features. Cambridge: Islamic Text Society, 1993.

Wensinck, Arnold John. Al-Mu’jam al-Mufahras li Alfāẓ al-Hadīth al-Nabawī. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1937.