Gen Z's Religiosity Level: A Comparative Study between Indonesia and the United Kingdom

Published: on JPAI: Dec 31, 2024
Jamilah
Devi Pramitha
Asep Ubaidillah
Md Mahmud Bin Sayeed
Pages: 307-318

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Download PDF Share Copyright

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to measure the religiosity levels of young Muslims in Indonesia and the United Kingdom and compare the characteristics of religiosity in the two countries. Furthermore, it analyzes whether the level of religious literacy contributes to the observed differences in religiosity.

Design/method/approach – This study is quantitative research utilizing a survey approach. The research subjects were young Muslims in Indonesia and the United Kingdom, selected through purposive sampling methods. The data collection instruments consisted of a questionnaire adapted from the five approaches developed by Yusuf (2021) to measure the level of religious literacy, as well as the Centrality of Religious Scale (CRS) developed by Huber and Huber (2012). The collected data were then analyzed using EViewsⓇ version 16 software to perform regression analysis, namely to identify the relationship between religious literacy and religiosity.

Findings – The results indicate that the religiosity level among Gen Z Muslims in Indonesia is higher (83%) than that of their counterparts in the United Kingdom (79%). This difference is primarily influenced by cultural and educational contexts, where Indonesian Gen Z tend to have higher religious literacy through religion-related courses, whereas the UK Gen Z shows significant religiosity levels through community engagement and willingness to learn as a minority. However, regression analysis reveals an R-squared of 20-21% in both countries, suggesting that religious literacy does not significantly impact their religiosity level.

Research implications/limitations – The findings of the study indicate that religious literacy does not have a significant influence on the level of religiosity of Gen Z Muslims in Indonesia and the United Kingdom. Consequently, it is suggested that increasing religiosity should focus on other aspects, including faith-based education, community engagement, and the cultural context.

Keywords:

Gen Z Indonesia Religious Literacy Religy United Kingdom

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References

Alvara Research Center. (2020). Indonesia Gen Z and Millennial Report 2020: The Battle of Our Generation. https://alvara-strategic.com/indonesia-gen-z-and-millenial-report-2020/.

Baskoro, D. G., & Kolibu, D. R. (2022). The Impact of Christian Religious Education on Generation Z Christian Nationalism Insight, with Spirituality as a Mediating Variable. Endless: International Journal of Future Studies, 5(3), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.54783/endlessjournal.v5i3.113

Basri, Hasan. (2017). Filsafat Pendidikan Islam. Pustaka Setia Bandung.

Dimock, M. (2019). Defining Generations: Where Millennial Ends and Generation Z begins. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/.

Dister, N.S. (1994). Pengalaman dan Motivasi Beragama. Penerbit Kanisius.

Epafras, L., Kaunang, H., Jemali, M., & Setyono, V. (2021). Transitional Religiosity: The Religion of Generation Z. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Religious Life, ISRL 2020, 2-5 November 2020, Bogor, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.2-11-2020.2305063

Glock, C.Y., and Stark, R. (1965). Religion and Society in Tension. Rand McNally and Company.

Hasanah, N. and Huriyah. (2022). Religius Radikal: Dualisme Gen-Z dalam Mengekspresikan Kesadaran Beragama dan Kesalehan. Jurnal Penelitian 16(1) 23-52. https://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/jurnalPenelitian/article/view/13759.

Hayes, A. (2021). The Emotional, Mental, And Spiritual Well-Being of Gen Z: Perceived Social Media Messages. Liberty University Lynchburg.

Husein, F., and Slama, M. (2018). Online Piety and its Discontent: Revisiting Islamic Anxieties on Indonesia Social Media. Indonesia and the Malay World 46(134) 80-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2018.1415056

Miles, M.B., Huberman, M.A., and Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications Inc.

Moore, D.L. (2015). Overcoming Religious Illiteracy: A Cultural Studies Approach. https://worldhistoryconnected.press.uillinois.edu/cgi-bin/printpage.cgi.

Nurzakiyah, C. (2018). Literasi Agama Sebagai Alternatif Pendidikan Moral. JPA, 19(2), 25.

Office for National Statistics. (2022). Religion, England, and Wales: Census 2021. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/religion/bulletins/religionenglandandwales/census2021.

‌Pabbajah, Mustaqim. (2024). The religious transformation of Gen Z in the new media era. Islamic Communication Journal, 9(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.21580/icj.2024.9.1.20557

Park, S. Y., Do, B., Yourell, J., Hermer, J., & Huberty, J. (2024). Digital Methods for the Spiritual and Mental Health of Generation Z: Scoping Review. Interactive Journal of Medical Research, 13, e48929. https://doi.org/10.2196/48929

Parker, S. (2020). Religious Literacy: Spaces of Teaching and Learning about Religion and Belief. Journal of Beliefs & Values 41(2) 129-131, https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2020.1750243.

Polok, G., & Szromek, A. R. (2024). Religious and Moral Attitudes of Catholics from Generation Z. Religions, 15(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010025

Polutzian, R.E. (1996). Invitation to the Psychology of Religion. Allyn and Bacon.

Pusat Pengkajian Islam dan Masyarakat (PPIM) Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. (2020). Beragama di Dunia Maya: Media Sosial dan Pandangan Keagamaan di Indonesia. https://ppim.uinjkt.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Merit-Report_Beragama-di-Dunia-Maya-1.pdf.

Pusat Pengkajian Islam dan Masyarakat (PPIM) Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. (2021). Beragama ala Anak Muda: Ritual No, Konservatif Yes. https://ppim.uinjkt.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Merit-Report_Beragama-di-Dunia-Maya-1.pdf.

Rackley, E. D. (2010). Motivation for the Religious Literacy Practices of Religious Youth: Examining the Practices of Letter day Saint and Methodist Youth in One Community. University of Michigan

Rastiti, R. (2018). Media Literasi Bagi Digital Natives: Perspektif Generasi Z di Jakarta. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan 6(1), 60–73. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/286903-media-literasi-bagi-digital-natives-pers-af96c5d7.pdf.

Regita, E., and Sebayang, B. (2020). Mempertahankan Identitas Nasional di Era Digital. Rangkiang: Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat 1(2), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.22202/rangkiang.2019.V1I2.3778.

Rosyida, H. N., Kusumaningrum, D. N., and Anggraheni, P. (2020). Mengajak Generasi Z SMA 1 Muhammadiyah Malang Berinternet Secara Bijak. Aksiologiya: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 4(2), 199–212. http://103.114.35.30/index.php/Axiologiya/article/view/3743.

Wekke, I.S. and Tang, A. (2016). Kultur Pendidikan Islam di Minoritas Muslim Inggris. Thaqafiyyat 17(1) 70-83. https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/adab/thaqafiyyat/article/download/1081/750.

Yusuf, C.F. (2021). Literasi Keagamaan Generasi Milenial Indonesia: Tantangan Masa Depan. LIPI Press.

Ziang, W., Jindong, J., Xuan, C. et al. When income meets faith: the development and application of the Chinese generation Z unconventional religious orientation scale. BMC Psychol 12, 326 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01835-1

123

Views

66

Downloads

Open Access
Related Article: