Dari Teks Suci ke Representasi Visual: Ilustrasi sebagai Perangkat Hermeneutik dalam Tafsir Kontemporer Surah al-Mulk
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/cq.v6i1.7779Keywords:
Visual representation, Qur’anic hermeneutics, Surah al-MulkAbstract
This article seeks to investigate the role of visual illustrations as hermeneutical tools in Ashim Khan’s “The Kingdom of God: A Fully Illustrated Commentary on Surah al-Mulk”, and to elucidate their contribution to the advancement of contemporary Qur’anic exegesis methodology. This study is significant, as existing scholarship on visual exegesis has predominantly regarded visualisation as a medium for digital communication, reception, and religious popularisation, while its function as an integral element of the interpretive process has received comparatively limited academic attention. Employing a qualitative methodology with a content analysis approach, this research examines the visual representations within Khan’s work. The analysis utilises Stuart Hall’s encoding-decoding model to explore both the manner in which the exegete encodes meaning into visual representations and the way in which readers decode and reconstruct these meanings. The findings reveal that the visual illustrations in Khan’s commentary operate not merely as aesthetic enhancements but as hermeneutical devices that encode interpretive meanings through six distinct forms of visualisation: thematic diagrams, symmetry diagrams (naẓm), concept maps, timelines, relational diagrams, and analytical tables. These visual representations aid readers in comprehending the structure, coherence, and theological message of Sūrah al-Mulk, while simultaneously guiding them towards a preferred interpretation aligned with the exegete’s intended meaning. This study contributes to the expansion of discourse on visual exegesis by demonstrating that visualisation can be positioned as a contemporary exegetical method that integrates the classical naẓm tradition with modern visual culture, thereby enriching interdisciplinary approaches within contemporary Qur’anic studies.
References
Al-Ālūsī, Shihāb al-Dīn. Rūḥ Al-Maʿānī Fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm Wa al-Sabʿ al-Mathānī. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, n.d.
Al-Andalusī, Abū Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Ḥaqq ibn ʿAṭiyyah. Al-Muḥarrar al-Wajīz Fī Tafsīr al-Kitāb al-ʿAzīz. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2001.
Albayrak, Ismail. ‘Modernity, Its Impact on Muslim World and General Characteristics of 19–20th-Century Revivalist–Reformists’ Re-Reading of the Qur’an’. Religions 13, no. 5 (May 2022): 424. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13050424.
Al-Biqāʿī, Burhān al-Dīn Ibrāhīm. Naẓm Al-Durar Fī Tanāsub al-Āyāt Wa al-Suwar. Cairo: Dār al-Kitāb al-Islāmī, 1994.
Al-Qurṭubī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Al-Jāmiʿ Li Aḥkām al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risālah, 2006.
Al-Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn. Mafātīḥ Al-Ghayb. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1999.
Al-Ṭabarī, Muḥammad ibn Jarīr. Jāmiʿ Al-Bayān ʿan Taʾwīl Āy al-Qurʾān. Cairo: Dār Hajr, 2001.
Al-Zamakhsharī, Abū al-Qāsim Maḥmūd ibn ʿUmar. Al-Kashshāf ʿan Ghawāmiḍ Ḥaqāʾiq al-Tanzīl Wa ʿUyūn al-Aqāwīl Fī Wujūh al-Taʾwīl. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī, 2009.
Arifin, Johar, Ilyas Husti, Khairunnas Jamal, and Afriadi Putra. ‘Maqâṣid Al-Qur’ân in the Interpretation of M. Quraish Shihab about the Verse of Social Media Usage’. Jurnal Ushuluddin 28, no. 1 (June 2020): 44. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v28i1.7293.
Asridayani, Asridayani, and Vera Magria. ‘An Analysis of Syntactic Structure of Coordination on The English Translation of Surah Al-Mulk’. Jurnal Ilmiah Langue and Parole 6, no. 1 (December 2022): 13–18. https://doi.org/10.36057/jilp.v6i1.547.
Atikoh, Siti Nur Atikoh. ‘Living Qur’an: Tradisi Pembacaan Surah Al-Mulk: Studi di PP. Nurul Jadid Paiton Probolinggo’. Undergraduate, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, 2025. http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/77292/.
Binti Zainal, Nurul Fadzlin. ‘Tradisi Pembacaan Al-Qur’an Surah Al-Mulk di Surau Nurul Ibadah di Perkantoran Polisi Daerah Limbang Provinsi Sarawak (Studi Living Qur’an)’. Ushuluddin dan Humaniora, 11 January 2024. https://idr.uin-antasari.ac.id/25748/.
Bramasta, Mohammad Faqih, and Muhammad Faqih Ihsan. ‘Stuart Hall’s Representation: A Study of the Interpretation of Q.S. An-Nur: 26 in the Trend of Pre-Marital Studies on Social Media: Representasi Stuart Hall: Studi Penafsiran Q.S. An-Nur: 26 dalam Tren Kajian Pranikah di Media Sosial’. Takwil: Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies 3, no. 2 (2024): 21–36. https://doi.org/10.32939/twl.v3i2.4427.
Campanini, Massimo. The Qur’an: Modern Muslim Interpretations. London & New York: Routledge, 2011.
Campbell, Heidi A. ‘Surveying Theoretical Approaches within Digital Religion Studies’. New Media & Society 19, no. 1 (January 2017): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816649912.
Fadoli, Ach, Sakinah Naziha, and Wasik. ‘Reception of the Qur’an on Social Media: Case Study of Qur’an Interpretation on the Instagram Account @quranreview’. WARAQAT : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 7, no. 2 (December 2022): 150–59. https://doi.org/10.51590/waraqat.v7i2.338.
Febriani, Ina Salmah, and Salwa Zharifah Sastra. ‘The Digitalization of Qur’anic Exegesis on Instagram: A Netnographic Study of @quranreview and Student Reception’. Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 28, no. 1 (April 2026): 60–75. https://doi.org/10.22373/substantia.v28i1.33773.
Ghozali, Mahbub, and Chandra Kartika Dewi. ‘Dari Interpretasi Menuju Dekorasi dalam Quran Journaling di Instagram: Analisis Model Encoding/Decoding Akun @rusna_meswari’. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi 22, no. 2 (August 2024): 206–20. https://doi.org/10.31315/jik.v22i2.8749.
Ghozali, Mahbub, and Muhammad Toriq Nurmadiansyah. ‘Media Framing of QS. al-Nisā’ [4]: 34 by @quranreview on Instagram: Glorifying Women Tendencies in Interpretation’. Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an 19, no. 2 (July 2023): 225–48. https://doi.org/10.21009/JSQ.019.2.05.
Hall, Stuart. ‘Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse’. In CCCS Selected Working Papers, vol. 2, edited by Ann Gray et.al. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2007.
———. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: SAGE Publications, 2003.
Hidayat, M. Riyan, Muhafizah El-Feyza, Muh. Alwi Hs, Muhammad Akmaluddin, and Nazarmanto Nazarmanto. ‘Otoritas Dakwah Virtual Dalam Tafsir Rahmat H. Oemar Bakry: Analisis Intertekstualitas Julia Kristeva’. An-Nida’ 47, no. 1 (July 2023): 98. https://doi.org/10.24014/an-nida.v47i1.23022.
Hjarvard, Stig. ‘The Mediatisation of Religion: Theorising Religion, Media and Social Change’. Culture and Religion 12, no. 2 (June 2011): 119–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2011.579719.
Ibn Kathīr, Ismāʿīl ibn ʿUmar. Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān al-ʿAẓīm. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1998.
Ibn ʿĀshūr, Muḥammad al-Ṭāhir. Al-Taḥrīr Wa al-Tanwīr. Tunis: Al-Dār al-Tūnisiyyah li al-Nashr, 1984.
Ica, Annisa, and Al Gusma Setyawan. ‘Teori Representasi Stuart Hall: Mengungkap Makna dalam Media dan Budaya: Perspektif Teori Stuart Hall’. Sanak: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama 2, no. 2 (2024). https://e-journal.lp2m.uinjambi.ac.id/ojp/index.php/jsa/article/view/5538.
Ismath, Nurul Hanilah Mohd, and Abdul Hadi Bin Abd Aziz. ‘A Relevance Theory Approach to the Pragmatic Interpretation of Surah Al-Mulk’. QURANICA - International Journal of Quranic Research 17, no. 2 (December 2025): 216–36. https://doi.org/10.22452/quranica.vol17no2.35.
Istiqomah, Dina, Muhammad Rusidi, and Opi Yensi. ‘Tafsir Digital: Antara Adaptasi dan Krisis Otoritas Keagamaan’. Lathaif: Literasi Tafsir, Hadis dan Filologi 4, no. 1 (June 2025): 41. https://doi.org/10.31958/lathaif.v4i1.15416.
Khan, Ashim. The Kingdom of God: A Fully Illustrated Commentary on Surah al-Mulk. United Kingdom: The Islamic Foundation, 2021.
Khir, Bustami Mohamed. ‘The Qur’an and Science: The Debate on the Validity of Scientific Interpretations’. Journal of Qur’anic Studies 2, no. 2 (October 2000): 19–35. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2000.2.2.19.
Lukman, Fadhli. ‘Digital Hermeneutics and A New Face of the Qur`an Commentary: The Qur`an in Indonesian`s Facebook’. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 56, no. 1 (June 2018): 95–120. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2018.561.95-120.
Mir, Mustansir. Coherence in the Qur’an: A Study of Islahi’s Concept of Nazm in Tadabur-I Qur’an. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Islamic Book Trust, 2011.
Neuwirth, Angelika. The Qur’an: Text and Commentary, Volume 1: Early Meccan Suras: Poetic Prophecy. 1st edn. Translated by Samuel Wilder. Yale University Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300232332.001.0001.
Nur, Afrizal, Nanda Riswanda Pohan, and Alwizar. ‘Maqtaf: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Qur’an and Interactive Interpretation Analysis Engine to Improve Literacy of Ummah in the Digital Era’. AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis 10, no. 1 (April 2026): 128–44. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v10i1.16518.
Ohlander, Erik. ‘Modern Qur’anic Hermeneutics’. Religion Compass 3, no. 4 (July 2009): 620–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00144.x.
Pakeeza, Dr Shahzadi, and Dr Nosheen Zaheer. ‘A Comparative Analysis of Surāh Al-Mulk in the Light of Classical and Contemporary Tafasir’. Bannu University Research Journal in Islamic Studies 4, no. 1 (June 2017). https://burjis.com/index.php/burjis/article/view/121.
Pink, Johanna. ‘Modern and Contemporary Interpretation of the Qurʾān’. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to the Qurʾān, edited by Andrew Rippin and Jawid Mojaddedi, 479–91. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118964873.ch32.
———. Modern and Contemporary Interpretation of the Qurʾān. United Kingdom: Equinox Publishing Limited, 2019.
Rhafik, Muhammad Nur, Moh. Yardho, Abdullah Qohi, Nur Rohmat, Surya Saputra Mahmud, and Muhammad Ihsan Mahbub. ‘Qur’anic Exegesis in the Digital Sphere: The Dynamics of Authority, Audience, and Algorithms on Individual and Collective Platforms’. QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies 5, no. 2 (June 2026): 597–626. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v5i2.17742.
Rifain, Syakirah Rifa’in @. Mohd, Mat Taib Pa, Mohamad Hussin, and Faizuri Abd Latif. ‘The Concept of Uslub Amr in the Context of Islamic Creed in Surah Al-Mulk Based on Al-Awsi’s Opinion’. Afkar: Jurnal Akidah Dan Pemikiran Islam 25, no. 1 (June 2023): 327–60. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol25no1.11.
Saeed, Abdullah. Interpreting the Qur’an. 0 edn. Routledge, 2005. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203016770.
———. Reading the Qur’an in the Twenty-First Century. 0 edn. London & New York: Routledge, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315870922.
Sihabussalam, Sihabussalam, Sa’adatul Lailah, and Roma Wijaya. ‘Digital Era Qur’anic Interpretation in Indonesia:’ SUHUF 17, no. 1 (June 2024): 87–114. https://doi.org/10.22548/shf.v17i1.998.
Umam, Miftahul. ‘The Dynamics of the Reception of Surah Al-Mulk: An Analysis of Transmission and Transformation in Islamic Literature’. As-Sulthan Journal of Education 3, no. 1 (January 2026): 680–89.
Yuningsih, Hartati, and Abdul Ghany. ‘Transformasi Tafsir Al-Qur’an di Era Media Digital: Analisis Metodologi Tafsir dalam Channel Youtube Kajian Tafsir Al-Ma’rifah’. Al-Qudwah 2, no. 2 (August 2024). https://doi.org/10.24014/alqudwah.v2i2.29123.
Zaenuri, Ahmad. ‘Classical and Modern Exegesis Styles: The Evolution of the Development Exegesis Styles from Classical and Modern Periods’. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an dan Tafsir 8, no. 1 (June 2023): 20–38. https://doi.org/10.32505/at-tibyan.v8i1.6007.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Yasir, Afrizal Nur, Afriadi Putra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





