83
Views
47
PDF Downloads
Implementing and Addressing Challenges of LIMASTERS Integration in Early Childhood Education: A Case Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to explore the implementation and challenges of integrating LIMASTERS (Literacy, Mathematics, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Arts) in early childhood education within the School Mover Program in Jambi City. The research responds to the growing demand for 21st-century learning integration at the preschool level and examines how practices align with the principles of the Independent Curriculum.
Design/methods/approach – A qualitative case study design was applied. Data were collected through classroom observations, in-depth interviews with teachers and the principal, and document analysis of lesson plans and children’s work. Data were analyzed thematically using the Miles and Huberman model of data reduction, display, and conclusion drawing.
Findings – The study shows that literacy, mathematics, and arts are consistently integrated into daily learning, while science, technology, and engineering remain less developed. Teachers conduct initial assessments to align activities with children’s needs and interests. Key challenges include limited facilities, insufficient time, and teacher competencies. These are partly mitigated through peer collaboration, self-initiated training, and phased implementation.
Research implications/limitations – The findings are context-specific and do not address long-term child development outcomes. Nonetheless, they provide valuable insights for designing integrative curricula and teacher training policies in Indonesian ECE (Early Childhood Education).
Practical implications – The study offers a practical model for LIMASTERS integration through child-centered exploratory activities that emphasize interactive experiments, scaffolding, and contextualized learning.
Originality/value – This research contributes a holistic framework for balancing literacy and STEAM within early childhood classrooms in a local Indonesian context, highlighting the potential of exploratory and contextual learning to advance curriculum reform.
Paper type Case study
Keywords:
Downloads
Article Details
How to Cite
Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process. It can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Agustina, T. P., Rukmana, M., & Watung, F. A. (2024). Ethnobotany and the structure of Home garden in Pujon Sub-distict Malang Regency, East Java Indonesia. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 27, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.32859/era.27.31.1-32
Asmayawati, A. (2023). Can Technology Initiate The Enhancement of Digital Literacy in Early Childhood? Evidence From Indonesia. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 6(11), 7210-7219. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v6-i11-25
Asmayawati, Yufiarti, & Yetti, E. (2024). Pedagogical innovation and curricular adaptation in enhancing digital literacy: A local wisdom approach for sustainable development in Indonesia context. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100233
Bers, M. U. (2021). Coding as a Playground: Programming and Computational Thinking in the Early Childhood Classroom. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022602
Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM Education: A 2020 Vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70, 30–35.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
English, L. D. (2017). Advancing Elementary and Middle School STEM Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(S1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x
Fleer, M. (2015). Cultural-Historical Approaches to Studying Learning and Development: Socio-Political Contexts. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9184-7
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. Basic Books.
Hasanah, K., Sari, D. L., Kuncoro, H. R., & Kurniawati, E. (2025). Across Timelines: Decoding Cross-Regional Media Framings of Isis on X (2014–2023). Journal of International Studies (Malaysia), 21(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2025.21.1.4
Hasibuan, R., Fitri, R., Maureen, I., & Pratiwi, A. (2022). Penyusunan Kurikulum Operasional Pada Satuan Paud Berbasis Kurikulum Merdeka. Transformasi Dan Inovasi : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(2), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpm.v2n2.p87-92
Heckman, J. J. (2011). The Economics of Inequality: The Value of Early Childhood Education. American Educator, 35(1), 31–47.
Huliyah, M., Muhtadi, D., Imroatun, I., & Bastian, A. B. F. M. (2024). Teacher readiness and institutional support in raudatul atfal: Descriptive analysis of independent curriculum implementation. Al-Athfaal: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(2), 196-204. https://doi.org/10.24042/al-athfaal.v7i2.24677
Intisari, Mutmainnah, & Asrifan, A. (2024). Integrating STEM in Early Childhood Education: A Cutting-Edge Study on PAUD Development in Indonesia. British Journal of Teacher Education and Pedagogy, 3(1), 74-86. https://doi.org/10.32996/bjtep.2024.3.1.7
Jalil, Y. (2025). Challenges And Solutions in Implementing the Independent Curriculum. Lentera Anak, 6(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.34001/jla.v6i1.7473
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Capaian Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) Fase D (Vol. 3, p. 111).
Kim, Y., Park, N., & Lee, H. (2019). Early childhood teachers’ understanding of STEAM education in Korea. Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 13(3), 79–102.
Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and Trends in STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Academic Publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00218-6
Lisnawati, R., Jannah, N. L., & Sari, D. A. (2024). Independent Curriculum Policy in Early Childhood Education Units in Indonesia. Jurnal Edusci, 2(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.62885/edusci.v2i1.457
Mastikawati, M., Fitriah, F., & Azwir, A. (2024). Pelatihan dan Pendampingan Penyusunan Kurikulum Operasional Satuan Pendidikan (Kosp) Berbasis Kurikulum Merdeka. Kreasi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 4(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.51529/kjpm.v4i1.530
Matthew B. Miles, M. H., Johnny Saldana. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, 3rd Edition. USA, SAGE Publications, Inc.
Maulinda, R., Subhan, R., Yuliah, Y., & Abdullah, D. (2024). The Influence of Learning Technology on Early Childhood Literacy Development in Indonesia. International Journal of Language and Ubiquitous Learning, 1(4), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijlul.v1i4.688
Moomaw, S. (2013). Teaching STEM in the Early Years: Activities for Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Redleaf Press.
Mustari, M. (2015). Character values: Reflections for character education. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Novita, S., Anindhita, V., Wijayanti, P. A. K., Santoso, L. A. B., La Batavee, H., Tampubolon, A. F. J., & Syafitri, A. N. (2023). Relationship Between Numeracy and Vocabulary Skills in Indonesian Preschool Children and the Impacts of Learning Environments. IJEC 56, 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-023-00356-z
Nur, N., & Hanum, A. L. A. L. (2023). Analisis Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka PAUD Di Kabupaten Sleman. Jurnal Warna : Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Anak Usia Dini, 8(2), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.24903/jw.v8i2.1399
Papalia, D. E., Olds, S. W., & Feldman, R. D. (2011). Human development (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.
Rakhman, F., & Surur, M. (2024). Analysis of the Readiness of Driving School Teachers in Implementing the Independent Curriculum at the PAUD Level in Situbondo Regency. Al-Hijr: Journal of Adulearn World, 3(1), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.55849/alhijr.v3i1.596
Shonkoff, J. P. (2017). Rethinking the Definition of Evidence-Based Interventions to Promote Healthy Development. Pediatrics, 140(6), e20173136. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-3136
Sriandila, R., Suryana, D., & Mahyuddin, N. (2023). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di PAUD Nurul Ikhlas Kemantan Kebalai Kabupaten Kerinci. Journal on Education, 5(2), 1826-1840. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i2.823
Tatminingsih, S. (2022). Implementation of Digital Literacy in Indonesia Early Childhood Education. International Journal of Emerging Issues in Early Childhood Education, 4(1), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijeiece.v4i1.894
Thomas, J. W. (2020). Project-Based Learning: A Resource for Instructors and Program Designers. Buck Institute for Education. https://www.pblworks.org/
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Jossey-Bass.
UNESCO. (2020). Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and education – All means all. UNESCO Publishing.
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A Comparative Analysis of International Frameworks for 21st Century Competences: Implications for National Curriculum Policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Wahyuni, S. (2020). Pengukuran Densitas dan Diameter Pohon Pulai (Alstonia Scholaris) di Taman Hutan Raya Sultan Syarif Hasyim. Jurnal Ilmiah Pertanian, 16(2), 88-93. https://doi.org/10.31849/jip.v16i2.3560
Wondal, R., Mahmud, N., Arfa, U., Oktaviani, W., & Djaenal, N. (2023). Driving School Teachers Perceptions of the Implementation of the Learning Independence Curriculum in the Central Ternate Paud Cluster. Journal International Inspire Education Technology, 2(3), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.55849/jiiet.v2i3.469
Yakman, G. (2008). STEAM Education: An Overview of Creating a Model of Integrative Education. Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology. STEAM Educational Model.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications.
Yudha, R. P., & Hetharia, T. S. (2025). Analysis of the Validity of the Instrument for Early Childhood Numeracy Literacy Assessment. Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET), 4(1), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v4i1.685
Yuliana, Y., Susari, H. D., & Anwar, R. N. (2022). Upaya Penumbuhan Perilaku Toleransi pada Anak Usia Dini di Lembaga PAUD. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(4), 3456–3468. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i4.2000
Yulianti, K., & Handayani, D. (2021). Implementation of the LIMASTERS learning model in the independent curriculum for early childhood education. Journal of Innovative Education, 7(2), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.17509/cd.v14