Reception of the Prophet Muhammad’s Physical Descriptions from al-Syamāʾil al-Muḥammadiyyah in Digital Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v26i2.6725Keywords:
Visual Representation, Prophetic Depiction, al-Syamāʾil al-Muḥammadiyyah, Reception Analysis, Digital MediaAbstract
This article examines debates over visual depictions of the Prophet Muḥammad by reconnecting them to their canonical roots in al-Syamāʾil al-Muḥammadiyyah. Classical hadith sources especially al-Tirmiżī’s al-Syamāʾil al-Muḥammadiyyah, articulate detailed verbal portraits of the Prophet that function as an aniconic “verbal icon” within Islamic tradition. It addresses a scholarly gap in which studies of cartoons, memes, and films are often media-centered and seldom grounded in the hadith corpus that first articulated the Prophet’s physical attributes, leaving the link between canonical verbal portraits and modern visual translations underexplored. Methodologically, the article applies a reception-history approach (reception analysis) to three datasets: (1) descriptive hadith on the Prophet’s traits, (2) Indonesian sermons and mawlid recitations, and (3) contemporary digital media (memes, cartoons, films), using qualitative content analysis. The study finds that controversy stems less from visualization per se than from competing regimes of authority that govern representation: Islamic tradition transmits these canonical verbal portraits, whereas modern media often circulate images detached from those sources, intensifying public dispute. Bridging textual scholarship and social practice, the article shows how syamāʾil-based descriptions are orally received in devotional settings and how their norms of reverence collide with satire- and free-speech logics online, clarifying why certain images provoke offense while others do not.
Abstract viewed: 363 times
|
PDF downloaded = 240 times
References
Abū Dāwūd, Sulaymān ibn al-Asyʿats ibn Isḥāq ibn Basyīr al-Azdī al-Sijistānī. Sunan Abī Dāwūd Maʿa Syarḥihi ʿAwn Al-Maʿbūd. New Delhi. Vol. 4. India: Al-Maṭbaʿah al-Anṣāriyyah bi-Dihlī – al-Hind, 1905.
Adamu, Abdalla Uba. ‘Controversies and Restrictions of Visual Representation of Prophets in Northern Nigerian Popular Culture’. Journal of African Media Studies 9, no. 1 (2017): 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1386/jams.9.1.17_1.
Al-‘Asqalānī, Aḥmad bin ‘Alī bin Ḥajar. Fatḥ Al-Bārī Bi-Syarḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Vol. 6. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah, 1959.
Al-Baghawī, Abū Muḥammad al-Ḥusayn bin Mas‘ūd bin Muḥammad bin al-Farrā’. Syarḥ Al-Sunnah. Vol. 13. Damaskus-Beirut: Al-Maktab al-Islāmī, 1983.
Al-Bukhārī, Muḥammad bin Ismā‘īl bin Ibrāhīm bin al-Mughīrah bin Bardizbah. Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī. Vol. 4. Mesir: Al-Sulṭāniyyah, 2001.
———. Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī. Vol. 7. Mesir: Al-Sulṭāniyyah, 2001.
Al-Ḥajjāj, Abū al-Ḥusayn Muslim bin. Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Vol. 4. Mesir: Maṭba‘at ‘Īsā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī wa Syurakā’uh, 1955.
al-Lajnah al-Dāʾimah lil-Buḥūth al-ʿIlmiyyah wa al-Iftāʾ. Fatāwā Al-Lajnah al-Dāʾimah – al-Majmūʿah al-Ūlā. Edited by Aḥmad ibn ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Duwaysh. Vol. 3. Riyadh: Riʾāsah Idārat al-Buḥūth al-ʿIlmiyyah wa al-Iftāʾ, n.d.
Al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn. Jāmi‘ al-Aḥādīs. Vol. 13. n.d.
Al-Tirmiżī, Abū ‘Īsā Muḥammad bin ‘Īsā. Al-Jāmi‘ al-Kabīr (Sunan al-Tirmiżī). Vol. 6. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 1996.
———. Al-Syamāʾil al-Muḥammadiyyah. Dār al-Fikr al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1971.
Anas, Mālik bin. Al-Muwaṭṭa’. Vol. 2. Beirut-Lebanon: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī, 1985.
Andrae, Tor, and M. Isran. Mohammed The Man and His Faith: Pribadi Dan Keimanan Nabi Muhammad Saw. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD, 2024.
Bakker, Freek L. The Challenge of the Silver Screen: An Analysis of the Cinematic Portraits of Jesus, Rama, Buddha, and Muhammad. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
Bouko, C., L. Calabrese, and O. De Clercq. ‘Cartoons as Interdiscourse: A Quali-Quantitative Analysis of Social Representation Based on Collective Imagination in Cartoons Produced after the Charlie Hebdo Attack’. Discourse, Context and Media 15 (2017): 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.12.001.
Derman, M. Uğur. Letters in Gold: Ottoman Calligraphy from the Sakıp Sabancı Collection, Istanbul. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1998.
Ferenčik, Milan. ‘I’m Not Charlie:(Im) Politeness Evaluations of the Charlie Hebdo Attack in an Internet Discussion Forum’. Journal of Pragmatics 111 (2017): 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.02.002.
Ghozali, Mahbub, Achmad Yafik Mursyid, and Nita Fitriana. “Al-Qur’an (Re)Presentation in the Short Video App Tiktok: Reading, Teaching, and Interpretive.” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 30, no. 3 (August 2022): 1263–82. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.30.3.18.
Gruber, Christiane. ‘Between Logos (Kalima) And Light (Nūr): Representations Of The Prophet Muhammad In Islamic Painting’. Muqarnas Online 26, no. 1 (2009): 229–62. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004175891.i-386.66.
———. ‘Prophetic Products: Muhammad in Contemporary Iranian Visual Culture’. Material Religion 12, no. 3 (2016): 259–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/17432200.2016.1192148.
———. The Praiseworthy One: The Prophet Muhammad in Islamic Texts and Images. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2018.
Gruber, Christiane, and Avinoam Shalem. ‘Introduction: Images of the Prophet Muhammad in a Global Context’. In The Image of the Prophet between Ideal and Ideology. German: De Gruyter, 2014.
Gürsel, Zeynep Devrim. ‘Visualizing Publics: Digital Crowd Shots and the 2015 Unity Rally in Paris’. Current Anthropology 58, no. S15 (2017): S135–48.
Ḥanbal, Al-Imām Aḥmad bin. Musnad Al-Imām Aḥmad Bin Ḥanbal. Vol. 14. Mu’assasat al-Risālah, 2001.
———. Musnad Al-Imām Aḥmad Bin Ḥanbal. Vol. 21. Mu’assasat al-Risālah, 2001.
———. Musnad Al-Imām Aḥmad Bin Ḥanbal. Vol. 30. Mu’assasat al-Risālah, 2001.
Harpci, Fatih. ‘Muhammad Speaking of the Messiah: Jesus in the Hadith Tradition’. Dissertation, Temple University, 2013.
Hashmi, Umair Munir, Radzuwan Ab Rashid, Mohamed Anwar Omar Din, and Kamariah Yunus. ‘How Has Social Media Impacted the Life of an Individual Who Publicly Challenges Authoritative Discourse?’ IEEE, 2020, 43–47.
Hebdo, Charlie. ‘A Chiare Lettere’. Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale, 2015, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.13130/1971-8543/4607.
John Wansbrough, and Andrew Rippin. Quranic Studies: Sources and Methods Of Scriptural Interpretation. New York: Promotheusbook, 2004.
Kaharuddin, Kaharuddin, and Syafruddin Syafruddin. ‘Peran Sahabat Dalam Merekostruksi Keberadaan Hadis Nabi Muhammad Saw’. TAJDID: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Dan Kemanusiaan 1, no. 2 (2017): 252–60. https://doi.org/10.52266/tadjid.v1i2.49.
Keren, Ran. ‘From Resistance to Reconciliation and Back Again: A Semiotic Analysis of the Charlie Hebdo Cover Following the January 2015 Events’. Semiotica 2018, no. 225 (2018): 269–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0128.
Khalidi, Tarif. Images of Muhammad: Narratives of the Prophet in Islam across the Centuries. USA: Harmony, 2009.
Khan, L Ali. ‘The Ministry of Jesus: A Comparative Study of the Qur’an and New Testament’. Available at SSRN 5199492 21, no. 1 (2025): 1–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5199492.
Khoiriah, Rike Luluk. ‘Poligami Nabi Muhammad Menjadi Alasan Legitimasi Bagi Umatnya Serta Tanggapan Kaum Orientalis’. Jurnal Living Hadis 3, no. 1 (2018): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14421/livinghadis.2017.1374.
Koçer, Mustafa, and Fikret Yazıcı. ‘İslamofobinin Charlie Hebdo Dergisi Twitter Hesabında Paylaşılan Karikatürler Örneğinde İncelenmesi’. Medya ve Din Araştırmaları Dergisi (Journal of Media and Religion Studies) 1, no. 2 (2018): 191–209.
Löwy, Michael. ‘The Secular Prophet of Religious Socialism: The Erich Fromm’s Early Writings (1922-1930)’. Tempo Social 32, no. 2 (2020): 21–31. https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2020.168672.
Marzouki, Yousri, Eliza Barach, Vidhushini Srinivasan, Samira Shaikh, and Laurie Beth Feldman. ‘The Dynamics of Negative Stereotypes as Revealed by Tweeting Behavior in the Aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo Terrorist Attack’. Heliyon 6, no. 8 (2020): 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04311.
Meyer, Birgit. ‘Religious Revelation, Secrecy and the Limits of Visual Representation’. Anthropological Theory 6, no. 4 (2006): 431–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499606071596.
Mukhlis, Febri Hijroh. ‘Konsep Ummah Dalam Piagam Madinah; Asas Demokrasi Nabi Muhammad Dan Relevansinya Di Indonesia’. Al-Tadabbur 5, no. 1 (2019): 1–16.
Mursyid, Achmad Yafik, RESEPSI ESTETIS TERHADAP AL-QUR’AN (Implikasi Teori Resepsi Estetis Navid Kermani Terhadap Dimensi Musikalik al-Qur’an). UIN Sunan Kalijaga, October 2013.
Musyafiq, Ahmad. ‘Urgensi Sirah Nabawiyah Bagi Pemahaman Hadis Nabawi’. At-Taqaddum 5, no. 2 (2016): 212–31. https://doi.org/10.21580/at.v5i2.732.
Neitz, Mary Jo. Charisma and Community: A Study of Religious Committment within the Charismatic Renewal. USA: Transaction Publishers, 1987.
Rytter, Mikkel. ‘By the Beard of the Prophet: Imitation, Reflection and World Transformation among Sufis in Denmark’. Ethnography 17, no. 2 (2016): 229–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138116632000.
Sanseverino, Ruggero Vimercati. ‘Theology of Veneration of the Prophet Muḥammad’. In The Presence of the Prophet in Early Modern and Contemporary Islam, vol. 1. Leiden;Boston: Brill, 2022.
Spencer, Robert. The Truth about Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion. USA: Regnery Publishing, 2006.
Takács, Axel. ‘Mary and Muhammad: Bearers of the Word-Their Roles in Divine Revelation’. Journal of Ecumenical Studies 48, no. 2 (2013): 220–43.
Watt, W. Montgomery. Bell’s Introduction to The Qur’ān. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1970.
Weaver, Simon. ‘Liquid Racism and the Danish Prophet Muhammad Cartoons’. Current Sociology 58, no. 5 (2010): 675–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392110372728.
Werbner, Richard. ‘The Charismatic Dividual and the Sacred Self’. Journal of Religion in Africa 41, no. 2 (2011): 180–205.
Yanuartha, Rizki Amalia, and Sih Natalia Sukmi. ‘Makna Karikatur Interpretatif Nabi Muhammad Pada Cover Majalah Charlie Hebdo (Analisis Semiotika Roland Barthes Cover Depan Majalah Perancis Charlie Hebdo Edisi 19 September 2012)’. Cakrawala Jurnal Penelitian Sosial 2, no. 2 (2013): 481–521.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Alfatih Suryadilaga, Ahmad Murtaza MZ, Cut Nadila Apni, Resky Eka Yulianti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Publishing your paper with Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis means that the author or authors retain the copyright in the paper. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis uses license CC-BY-NC-ND or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly works. This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, translate, transform or build upon the material you may use it for private use only and not for distribution. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis granted an exclusive non-commercial reuse license by the author(s), but the author(s) are able to put the paper onto a website, distribute it to colleagues, give it to students, use it in your thesis, etc, so long as the use is not directed at a commercial advantage or toward private monetary gain. The author(s) can reuse the figures and tables and other information contained in their paper published by Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis in future papers or work without having to ask anyone for permission, provided that the figures, tables, or other information that is included in the new paper or work properly references the published paper as the source of the figures, tables or other information, and the new paper or work is not direct at a private monetary gain or commercial advantage.
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis journal Open Acces articles are distrubuted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Article can be read, copy and redistribute the material ini any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
