THE PRACTICE OF SUBSTITUTE HEIRS IN INDONESIAN RELIGIOUS COURT: Restricted Interpretation

Authors

  • Fathul Mu’in Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Raden Intan Lampung
  • Faisal Faisal Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Raden Intan Lampung
  • Arif Fikri Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Raden Intan Lampung
  • Habib Shulton Asnawi Institut Agama Islam Maarif NU (IAIMNU) Metro Lampung
  • M Anwar Nawawi Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Tulang Bawang, Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2023.16107

Keywords:

Substitute heirs, Religious Court, Islamic inheritance law, restricted interpretation

Abstract

As part of reformation outcomes, the substitute heir in Islamic inheritance law has been long heeded by Indonesian jurists. However, amidst the facet of the traditional scheme, Indonesian Religious Court judges (judex factie) have not shared the same implementation of this succession. This article endeavors to examine the practice of substitute heir in the field. Relies on the Religious Court decisions as the primary source, this article argues that the norm of substitute heir (Article 185 of The Compilation of Islamic Law) has been implemented restrictedly according to The Compilation and the Supreme Court consensus. Restricted interpretation means the descendants of the pre-deceased side-relative was not accounted as substitute heir. It implies that the state reformation attempt in Islamic inheritance law has not come into play in the way the state desires.

[Sebagai bagian dari hasil reformasi, substitute heir dalam hukum waris Islam telah lama diperhatikan oleh para ahli hukum Indonesia. Namun, di tengah sisi skema tradisional, hakim Pengadilan Agama Indonesia (judex factie) belum memiliki kesamaan pelaksanaan suksesi ini. Artikel ini mencoba mengkaji praktek penerapan substitute heir di lapangan. Berpijak pada putusan Pengadilan Agama sebagai sumber data utama, artikel ini berargumen bahwa norma ahli waris pengganti (Pasal 185 Kompilasi Hukum Islam) telah dilaksanakan secara terbatas menurut Kompilasi dan konsensus Mahkamah Agung. Penafsiran terbatas berarti keturunan dari kerabat menyamping yang telah meninggal dunia terlebih dahulu tidak diperhitungkan sebagai ahli waris pengganti. Ini menyiratkan bahwa upaya reformasi negara dalam hukum waris Islam belum diterapkan sesuai yang diinginkan negara.]

References

Anderson, James N D. “Recent Reforms in the Islamic Law of Inheritance.” International & Comparative Law Quarterly 14, no. 2 (1965): 349–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/14.2.349.

Berkah, Dian, and Tjiptohadi Sawarjuwono. “Inheritance Wealth Distribution Model and Its Implication to Economy.” Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 7, no. 3 (2019): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.731.

Cammack, Mark. “Islamic Inheritance Law in Indonesia: The Influence of Hazairin’s Theory of Bilateral Inheritance.” Australian Journal of Asian Law 4, no. 3 (2002): 295–315. https://doi.org/10.3316/agispt.20030867.

Carroll, Lucy. “The Ithna Ashari Law of Intestate Succession: An Introduction to Shia Law Applicable in South Asia.” Modern Asian Studies 19, no. 1 (1985): 85–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X00014566.

Djawas, Mursyid, Gamal Achyar, Nursyirwan Bustanul Arifin, Masri Reza, and Baharuddin Umar Yakub. “The Legal Position of Children of Incest (A Study of Madhhab Scholars and Compilation of Islamic Law).” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 1 (2022): 139–55. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i1.11904.

Djawas, Mursyid, Khairuddin Hasballah, Soraya Devy, Muntasir A Kadir, and Yusfriadi Abda. “The Construction of Islamic Inheritance Law: A Comparative Study of the Islamic Jurisprudence and the Compilation of Islamic Law.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 21, no. 2 (2022): 207–19. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v21i2.7495.

Habib, Muchlis Samfrudin. “Sistem Kewarisan Bilateral Ditinjau Dari Maqashid Al-Syari’ah.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 9, no. 1 (2017): 367655. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v9i1.4241.

Ideham, Wahidah. “Substitute Heirs in the Compilation of Islamic Law: An Overview from Gender Equality Perspective Case Study of the Religious Courts in Banjarmasin.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (2022): 1046–64. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.12466.

Karani, Pasnelyza. “Tinjauan Ahli Waris Pengganti Dalam Hukum Kewarisan Islam Dan Hukum Kewarisan KUH Perdata.” Universitas Diponegoro, 2010.

Karjoko, Lego, Abdul Kadir Jaelani, Hilaire Tegnan, Henning Glaser, and Muhammad Jihadul Hayat. “Islamic Court’s Approach to Land Dispute in Inheritance Cases.” AHKAM: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 21, no. 2 (2021): 213–38. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v21i2.21864.

Khairuddin, Hasballah, Ridwan Nurdin, Zainuddin Muslim, and Fahmi Mutiara. “Patah Titi and Substitute Heirs: A Study of Legal Pluralism on the Inheritance System in Aceh Community.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 21, no. 1 (2021): 229–324. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v21i2.22792.

Larasati, Putri, M Darudin, and Sirman Dahwal. “Dispute Resolution of Inheritance Distribution for The Substitute Heir in Terms of Islamic Law.” Bengkoelen Justice: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 11, no. 1 (2021): 97–109. https://doi.org/10.33369/j_bengkoelenjust.v11i1.15794.

Moechthar, Oemar, Agus Sekarmadji, and Ave Maria Frisa Katherina. “A Juridical Study of Granting Wills to Heirs in the Perspective of Islamic Inheritance Law.” Yuridika 37, no. 3 (2022): 739. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v37i3.41161.

Muhibbin, Moh, and Abdul Wahid. Hukum Kewarisan Islam: Sebagai Pembaruan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2022.

Nurhidayah, Nurhidayah, and Mahsyar Mahsyar. “Comparison of Substitute Herities between Civil Law and Islamic Law in Indonesia.” Al-Iftah: Journal of Islamic Studies and Society 1, no. 2 (2020): 106–24.

Nurlaelawati, Euis. Modernization, Tradition, and Identity: The Kompilasi Hukum Islam and Legal Practice in Indonesian Religious Courts. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2010.

Permana, Sugiri. “Implications of Hazairin and Munawir Sjadzali Thoughts In Establishment of Islamic Inheritance In Indonesia.” AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 18, no. 2 (2018): 375–94. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v18i2.9866.

Redi, Ahmad, and Hartini Antasari. “Comparative Analysis on the Regulation of Substitute Heir’s Position in the Civil and Islamic Inheritance Law Perspective.” In 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2021), 850–56. Atlantis Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220404.135.

Reskiani, Anugrah, Dian Furqani Tenrilawa, Aminuddin Aminuddin, and Rahman Subha. “Reform Methods of Islamic Inheritance Law in Indonesia in Jurisprudence.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 21, no. 1 (2022): 39–51. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v21i1.5564.

Rofiq, Ahmad. Hukum Perdata Islam Di Indonesia Edisi Revisi, Cet. 2. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2015.

———. Pembaharuan Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. Gama Media, 2001.

Utama, Sofyan Mei. “Islamic Law Review on The Determination of Surrogate Heirs.” International Journal of Nusantara Islam 6, no. 2 (2018): 133–43. https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v6i2.3954.

Zaelani, Abdul Qodir. “Kedudukan Ahli Waris Pengganti (Plaatsvervulling) Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam Dan Pemecahannya.” ADHKI: Journal of Islamic Family Law 2, no. 1 (2020): 91–105. https://doi.org/10.37876/adhki.v2i1.32.

Zuhroh, Diana. “Criticizing the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) to Resolve the Case of Grandchildren’s Inheritance Right in Religious Courts.” In 1st International Seminar on Sharia, Law and Muslim Society (ISSLAMS 2022), 23–36. Atlantis Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-81-7_4.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

THE PRACTICE OF SUBSTITUTE HEIRS IN INDONESIAN RELIGIOUS COURT: Restricted Interpretation. (2023). Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 16(1), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2023.16107

Similar Articles

21-30 of 181

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.