873

Views

759

PDF Downloads

28

XML Views

Original article
Open Access

The Importance of Agricultural Knowledge in Early Childhood Education: A Scoping Review

M. Fadlillah
,
Eka Oktavianingsih
,
Nurmalisa Lisdayana
,
Muhammad Abdul Latif
Pages: 133-142
|
Published: Sep 30, 2023

Main Article Content

Abstract

Indonesia is an agrarian country and has potential in agriculture that is not in line with the potential of supporting human resources. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce agriculture from an early age. Early childhood learning programs with an agricultural perspective can equip children with knowledge about the importance of agriculture as well as basic skills such as caring for, watering and planting plants. This research aims to understand the importance of agriculture-based learning in early childhood education environments. This research method uses Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyze Extensions for scoping reviews using 3 databases namely science direct, google Scholar, and sage journals. The literature reviewed from the scoping review obtained 8 articles that fulfilled the use of qualitative and quantitative or mixed methods. The types of journals produced are mostly children's education journals, environmental education journals for children, and journals about nutrition for children. Many research subjects also center on children's intelligence, scientific and nature-friendly attitudes, cognitive, language, and social skills that children can acquire from gardening or agriculture-based learning. From data collection and preparation of literature material, benefits from agricultural-based learning programs are obtained. This benefit is the basis for the importance of agriculture-based learning in kindergarten children. The benefits of agricultural learning-based activities in Early Childhood Education (ECE) include increasing early childhood knowledge and love for agricultural activities, increasing children's naturalistic intelligence, promoting healthy food in early childhood, environmentally friendly attitudes, and cognitive intelligence.

Keywords:

Agriculture-based Learning Agricultural Knowledge Early Childhood Education

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Introduction

Indonesia is an agricultural country, which means that Indonesia has abundant natural wealth, and many Indonesians work in the farm sector. From a geographical perspective, Indonesia is located in a region with high rainfall. It is a tropical area with even sunlight intensity, thus producing various kinds of agricultural commodities such as palm oil, rubber, cocoa, etc. The Center for Research and Development of Land Resources in 2016 showed that 15.9 million ha of land in Indonesia has the potential for agricultural areas(B.B.S.D.L.P., 2017).

Indonesia's vast agricultural land has enormous potential to support the national economy. The high agrarian potential in Indonesia requires human resources who are capable and professional in the agricultural sector. Agricultural knowledge intelligent service technology is now seen as a fundamental solution to the challenges of organising and utilising agricultural information, enhancing the quality and yield of farm products(Zhao, 2023). Furthermore, a review of agrarian literacy studies underscores the pivotal role 133

Education and age are essential to sustain farmers' resources who can produce quality agricultural commodities. Based on the results of the 2018 inter-census agricultural survey, the farm workforce is primarily elderly, namely 20.8% 55-46 years old, 27.4% 45-54 years old, and 24% in the 35-44year-old age group 4% (Kementerian(Pertanian, 2021). The survey results show that young people's interest in becoming agricultural entrepreneurs is still low. Therefore, it is necessary to increase young people's interest in the farm sector through applicable learning methods in schools about agriculture. Practical learning about agriculture can be taught to middle school, elementary school-age children, and even early childhood.

The younger generation tends to have less desire to work in the agricultural sector, especially to become a farmer, because they are less likely to have a degree and provide less guarantee for the future(Susilowati, 2016). The younger generation has obstacles in becoming young farmers because there is a lack of income for farmers, it is challenging to obtain ownership of an adequate farm, and there needs to be more availability of part-time jobs. This causes the younger generation to be reluctant to take up the farming profession and have no desire to be interested in agriculture. The lack of agricultural knowledge in the younger generation causes a decline in the younger generation's interest in pursuing a career in agriculture. This phenomenon is a severe issue of agricultural poverty in Indonesia. Indeed, the digital transformation is reshaping agricultural knowledge, fostering enhanced human-tech connectivity and augmented transparency, although it poses governance challenges.

Currently, knowledge about agriculture among children is shallow(Trexler, 2000), especially for children who live in urban environments. Introduction to the potential of agriculture in early childhood has an excellent opportunity to increase interest, awareness and development in the future. Providing agricultural insight into early childhood can facilitate understanding and concern for nature and the surrounding environment, especially in the farming sector. For instance, a study by Kountios et al. (2023) emphasises the influential role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in transmitting agricultural knowledge, shaping a competitive edge in the field.

Learning about agriculture at an early age will increase interest and liking for agriculture in young Indonesians from an early age. Early childhood learning programs with an agricultural perspective can teach children the importance of agriculture and basic skills such as caring for, watering and planting plants. Therefore, this research aims to understand the significance of agricultural-based learning programs in early childhood education. This research uses the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyze Extensions for scoping reviews using three databases, namely Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Sage journals(Tricco et al., 2018).

Methods

In this research, we aim to review relevant literature regarding the importance of agriculture-based learning programs in early childhood to increase young children's knowledge and interest in agriculture. The method used in this study was a scoping review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMAScR) checklist(Tricco et al., 2018). This design uses several questions prepared using 5 of the six stages developed by Arksey and O'Malley (Arksey O'Malley, 2005). The five stages are identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, study selection, data extraction, and collating, summarising and reporting the results(Levac et al., 2010).

Identifying the research question

The questions in this research were prepared using specific keywords using PICO. Researchers used particular keywords arranged according to the PICO framework (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome). PICO is a model for developing questions that are structured to be relevant(Eriksen & Frandsen, 2018).

PICO
Early childhoodKnow about agricultureEfforts to increase young children's knowledge and interest in agriculture through agriculture-based learning programs in ECELack of knowledge about agricultureLack of agriculture-based learning programs in ECEIncreased knowledge and intelligence as well as emotional early childhood through agriculture-based learning
Table 1.Scoping Review Questions

Identifying relevant studies

The literature search will include published and unpublished primary studies and reviews (grey literature). The databases used are Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Sage Journals. Search for relevant articles using keywords in English and Indonesian: gardening-based learning program in early childhood education to increase knowledge and love of agriculture.

Figure 1.PRISMA Flowchart

Study Selection

Literature was selected by identifying relevant articles using inclusion and exclusion criteria. The first screening of the title and abstract was with inclusion criteria, namely original research,

.....

Article Details

How to Cite

Fadlillah, M., Oktavianingsih, E., Lisdayana, N., & Latif, M. A. (2023). The Importance of Agricultural Knowledge in Early Childhood Education: A Scoping Review. Golden Age: Jurnal Ilmiah Tumbuh Kembang Anak Usia Dini, 8(3), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.14421/jga.2023.83-03

References

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping Studies: Towards A Methodological Framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

BBSDLP. (2017). Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian.

Best, A. L., & Kerstetter, K. (2020). Connecting Learning and Play in Farm-to-School Programs: Children’s Culture, Local School Context and Nested Inequalities. Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition, 15(2), 190–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19320248.2019.1588822

Brandt, M., Forbes, C., & Keshwani, J. (2017). Exploring Elementary Students’ Scientific Knowledge of Agriculture Using Evidence-Centered Design. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(3), 134–149. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.03134

Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. Environmental Education Research, 4(4), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462980040402

Cosby, A., Manning, J., Power, D., & Harreveld, B. (2022). New Decade, Same Concerns: A Systematic Review of Agricultural Literacy of School Students. Education Sciences, 12(4), 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040235

Deni Gustiana, A., Mira Mawaddah, D., & Tri Jayanti, D. (2019). Penerapan Kegiatan Berkebun Dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Anak Taman Kanak-Kanak. Cakrawala Dini: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 10(2), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.17509/cd.v10i2.21083

Eriksen, M. B., & Frandsen, T. F. (2018). The impact of PICO as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: A systematic review. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.345

Farfan-Ramirez, L., Diemoz, L., Gong, E. J., & Lagura, M. A. A. (2011). Curriculum Intervention in Preschool Children: Nutrition Matters! Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 43(4), S162–S165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2011.03.007

Faridy, F., & Rohendi, A. (2020). The Role of Parents in Developing Naturalistic Intelligence in Early Childhood. 454(Ecep 2019), 2009–2012. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200808.023

Izumi, B. T., Eckhardt, C. L., Hallman, J. A., Herro, K., & Barberis, D. A. (2015). Harvest for Healthy Kids Pilot Study: Associations between Exposure to a Farm-to-Preschool Intervention and Willingness to Try and Liking of Target Fruits and Vegetables among Low-Income Children in Head Start. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 115(12), 2003–2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2015.07.020

Kementerian Pertanian. (2021). Rencana Strategis Kementerian Pertanian Tahun 2020-2024. Salinan Keputusan Menteri Pertanian Republik Indonesia, 1–161.

Kim, K. J., Jung, E., Han, M. K., & Sohn, J. H. (2020). The Power of Garden-Based Curriculum to Promote Scientific and Nature-Friendly Attitudes in Children Through a Cotton Project. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 34(4), 538–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2020.1718251

Klemmer, C. D., Waliczek, T. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (2005). Growing minds: The effect of a school gardening program on the science achievement of elementary students. HortTechnology, 15(3), 448–452. https://doi.org/10.21273/horttech.15.3.0448

Koyimah, S. (2023). Konsep Urban Farming menjadi alternatif Kegaitan Bermain yang menyenangkan Bagi Anak usia Dini. 1(1), 169–175. https://journal.cvsupernova.com/index.php/pe/article/view/40

Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(69), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

McCloskey, M. L., Kesterson, H., Mena, N. Z., Dellaport, J., & Bellows, L. L. (2020). Farm to early care and education programming: A descriptive study of challenges and opportunities to promote healthful foods to young children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186857

Mirawati, M., & Nugraha, R. (2017). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Anak Usia Dini Melalui Aktivitas Berkebun. Early Childhood : Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.35568/earlychildhood.v1i1.50

Murakami, C. D., Su-Russell, C., & Manfra, L. (2018). Analyzing teacher narratives in early childhood garden-based education. Journal of Environmental Education, 49(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1357523

Namenek Brouwer, R. J., & Benjamin Neelon, S. E. (2013). Watch Me Grow: A garden-based pilot intervention to increase vegetable and fruit intake in preschoolers. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 363. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-363

Pratiwindya, D. (2018). The Effect of Hydroponic Gardening Activities and Parent Involvement on Childrenâ€TMS Naturalistic Intelligence. JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation, 4(2), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.21009/jisae.v4i2.9693

Rosenow, N. (2008). Teaching and Learning about the Natural World. Young Children on the Web, January, 1–4.

Rymanowicz, K., Hetherington, C., & Larm, B. (2020). Planting the Seeds for Nature-Based Learning: Impacts of a Farm- and Nature-Based Early Childhood Education Program. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 8(1), 44–63. https://eepro.naaee.org/research/eeresearch/nature-and-farm-based-preschool-programs-have-potential-positively-impact

Smith, L. L., & Motsenbocker, C. E. (2005). Impact of hands-on science through school gardening in Louisiana public elementary schools. HortTechnology, 15(3), 439–443. https://doi.org/10.21273/horttech.15.3.0439

Susilowati, S. H. (2016). Fenomena Penuaan Petani dan Berkurangnya Tenaga Kerja Muda serta Implikasinya bagi Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 34(1), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v34n1.2016.35-55

Taniguchi, T., Haslam, A., Sun, W., Sisk, M., Hayman, J., & Jernigan, V. B. B. (2022). Impact of a Farm-to-School Nutrition and Gardening Intervention for Native American Families from the FRESH Study: A Randomized Wait-List Controlled Trial. Nutrients, 14(13), 2601. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14132601

Trexler, C. J. (2000). A qualitative study of urban and suburban elementary student understandings of pest-related science and agricultural education benchmarks. Journal of Agricultural Education, 41(3), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2000.03089

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Wells, N. M., Cosco, N. G., Hales, D., Monsur, M., & Moore, R. C. (2023). Gardening in Childcare Centers: A Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Effects of a Garden Intervention on Physical Activity among Children Aged 3–5 Years in North Carolina. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(11), 5939. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20115939

Zhao, C. (2023). Agricultural Knowledge Intelligent Service Technology: A Review. Smart Agriculture, 5(2), 126–148. https://doi.org/10.12133/j.smartag.SA202306002