VALIDITY OF PRE-ISLAMIC ARABIC LITERATURE AS A SOURCE OF AUTHENTICATION OF HADIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2020.2102-11Keywords:
Hadith, Pre-Ismaic Literature, Authenticity, Narration, ContextAbstract
The focus of this paper is the authenticity of the hadith, because in addition to the problem of the method used, it is also a matter of sources that are problematic. One source that is often used is literature, especially pre-Islamic Arabic literature (jahiliyah). The relevance of literature in authenticating hadith gives rise to a question, the extent to which the validity of pre-Islamic Arabic Literature can be used as evidence and what are the requirements that must be met when the study of the authenticity of hadith uses pre-Islamic Literature as one of the proofs. Using a Using a descriptive analytic method with a historical approach, this paper concludes that pre-Islamic Arabic literature when used as a source of authenticity of the hadith then the task of research is to reduce the difference in question. The reduction is intended so that the legality of literature as a source of hadith authentication can be accepted. This reduction includes: (1) authorship. Just as the news attributed to the Prophet must be proven to have its source in the Prophet, pre-Islamic Arabic Literature must also be proven to come from pre-Islamic Arabic writers, (2) narration. Pre-Islamic Arabic literature must also be tested extrinsically as an extrinsic factor test on the Hadith of the Prophet, (3) context. Literature was born not in an empty space so that the content of pre-Islamic Arabic literature must also reflect the life of the Arab Nation in pre-Islamic times. Therefore, when the reduction has not yet been carried out, in the context of the accuracy of the study of the authenticity of the hadith it cannot be accepted.
References
’Umar, Mustofa. “Tradisi Penulisan Dalam Proses Transformasi Hadis .” TEOLOGIA 24, no. 1 (2013): 231–60. https://doi.org/10.21580/TEO.2013.24.1.323.
Abbott, Nabia. Studies in Arabic Literary Papyri. II. Qur’anic Commentary and Tradition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1967.
Adonis. Arkeologi Sejarah Pemikiran Arab-Islam. Edited by Khoiron Nahdiyyin. Vol. 2. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2007.
Ahmad, Lalu Turjiman. “Ignaz Goldziher: Kritikus Hadis Dan Kritikus Sastra.” Jurnal Holistic Al-Hadis 01, no. 1 (June 24, 2015): 87–120. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1341660.
———. “Sistem Isnād Hadīts Dan Awal Mula Penggunaannya Dalam Tradisi Periwayatan Puisi Arab Jahiliyah.” ALQALAM 28, no. 1 (April 29, 2011): 138. https://doi.org/10.32678/alqalam.v28i1.536.
al-Aḍlabī, Salaḥuddīn bin Aḥmad. Manhaj Naqd Al-Matan Inda Ulama’i Al-Hadiṡ Al-Nabawi. Beirut: Dar al-Afaq al-Jadid, 1983.
al-Bagdādī, Khatib. Al-Sunah Qabla Tadwin. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr, 1980.
al-Bukhāri, Muhammad bin Ismāil Abū Abdillah. Al-Jāmi’ Al-Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Mukhtaṣār. 4th ed. Beirut: Dar Ibn Kasir, 1987.
As-Shalih, Subhi. Membahas Ilmu-Ilmu Hadis. Surakarta: Pustaka firdaus, 1997.
Asriyah. “Perkembangan Sejarah Sastra Arab.” Rihlah: Jurnal Sejarah Dan Kebudayaan 4, no. 2 (December 16, 2016): 91–98. https://doi.org/10.24252/RIHLAH.V4I2.2834.
Atabik, Ahmad. “Menelisik Otentitas Kesejarahan Sunnah Nabi (Studi Atas Teori Common Link Dan Sanggahan Terhadapnya).” Riwayah 1, no. 2 (2016): 223–48.
Athoillah, Mahmud Abdillah Muhammad. Ma’ālim Syāiriyyah Ḥasān Baina Al-Jāhiliyyah Wa Al-Islām. Kairo: Kulliah al-Lughah al-Arabiyyah: Universitas al-Azhar, n.d.
Azami, M.M. Menguji Keaslian Hadis-Hadis Hukum Sanggahan Terhadap Origin of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. Surakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2004.
Azami, Muhammad Musthofa. Manhaj Al-Naqd Inda Al-Muhaddithin Wa Nas’atuh Wa Tarikhuh. 2nd ed. Saudi Arabia: Maktabah al-Kausar, 1982.
———. Muḥammad Musṭofa A’ẓamī, Dirāsah Fī Al-Ḥadīṡ Al-Nabawi Wa Tārikh Tadwīnuh. 1st ed. Beirut: Al-Maktabah al-Islāmi, 1980.
Bakir, Mohammad. “Kritik Matan Hadis Versi Muhaddisin dan Fuqaha’: Studi Pemikiran Hasjim Abbas.” SAMAWAT 2, no. 2 (December 1, 2018).
Bloom, Harold. The Epic. Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers, 2005.
Borg, Gert. “Poetry as a Source for the History of Early Islam: The Case of (Al-)ʿAbbās b. Mirdās.” Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies •. Vol. 15, 2015.
Brown, Jonathan A.C. “The Social Context of Pre-Islamic Poetry: Poetic Imagery and Social Reality in the Muallaqat.” Arab Studies Quarterly 25, no. 3 (June 22, 2003): 29–51.
Goldziher, Ignaz. A Short History of Classical Arabic Literature. Hildesheim : G. Olms, 1966.
———. Muslim Studies (Muhammedanische Studien). Vol. 2. London: Allen and Unwin, 1971.
Haeruddin. “Karakteristik Sastra Arab Pada Masa Pra-Islam.” Nady Al-Adab 13, no. 1 (January 23, 2018): 35–50.
Ham, Musahadi. Evolusi Konsep Sunnah : Implikasinya Pada Perkembangan Hukum Islam. Semarang: Aneka Ilmu IAIN Walisongo Press, 2000.
Hardjana, Andre. Kritik Sastra Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta: Gramedia, 1994.
Hasan, Md. Mahmudul. “Good Literature and Bad Literature: Debate on Islam and Poetry.” International Journal of Islamic Thoughts 3, no. 1 (June 2014): 43–54.
Hikmawati. “At-Tashawwurul-Islāmiy: Integrasi Sastra Arab Dan Islam | Hikmawati | Jurnal CMES.” Jurnal Studi Timur Tengah 11, no. 1 (2018).
Hitti, Philip. History of the Arabs. Rev. 10th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
Ismail, Syuhudi. Kaedah Kesahihan Sanad Hadis: Telah Kritis Dan Tinjauan Dengan Pendekatan Ilmu Sejarah. Jakarta: PT. Bulan Bintang, 1995.
Isnaeni, Ahmad. “Pemikiran Goldziher Dan Azami Tentang Penulisan Hadis.” KALAM 6, no. 2 (February 25, 2017): 363. https://doi.org/10.24042/klm.v6i2.411.
Juynboll, G. H. A. Muslim Tradition : Studies in Chronology, Provenance and Authorship of Early Hadith. Muslim Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511752155.
Juynboll, G. On the Origins of Arabic Prose : Reflections on Authenticity, 1982.
Malkawi, Bashar H. “Intellectual Property Protection from a Sharia Perspective.” Southern Cross University Law Review 16 (2013).
Masarwah, Nader. “Religious Beliefs in PreIslamic Poetry.” Sociology Study 3, no. 7 (2013): 531–42.
Meraj, Ahmad. “Arabic Poetry: Origin and Development.” International Journal of Humanities & Social Science 3, no. 1 (2015).
Musawi, Muhsin. Arabic Poetry : Trajectories of Modernity and Tradition. London: Routledge, 2010.
Mustamar, Marzuki. “Kodifikasi Sastra Arab Periode Klasik (Jahily).” LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra 1, no. 1 (October 15, 2011). https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v1i1.544.
New, Christopher. Philosophy of Literature : An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2007.
Noorhidayati, Salamah. Kritis Teks Hadis: Analisis Tentang Ar - Riwayah Bi Al - Ma’na Dan Implikasi Bagi Kualitas Hadis. Yogyakarta: Teras, 2009.
Rubanovich, Julia. “The Shāh-Nāma and Medieval Orality: Critical Remarks on the Oral Poetics Approach and New Perspectives1.” Middle Eastern Literatures. Routledge, August 1, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475262X.2013.843263.
Sehandi, Yohanes. Mengenal 25 Teori Sastra. Yogyakarta: Ombak, 2014.
Soebahar, Erfan. Periwayatan Dan Penulisan Hadis Nabi : Telaah Pemikiran Tokoh-Tokoh Hadis Mengenai Periwayatan Dan Penulisan Hadis-Hadis Nabi SAW . Semarang: Pustaka Rizki Putra, 2012.
Soebahar, H.M. Erfan. Menguak Fakta Keabsahan Al-Sunnah: Kritik Musthofa Al-Siba’i Terhadap Pemikiran Ahmad Amin Mengenai Hadits Dalam Fajr Al-Islam. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2003.
Stetkevych, Suzanne. The Mantle Odes Arabic Praise Poems to the Prophet Muhammad. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010.
Syamsuddin, Sahiron. “Kaidah Kemuttasilan Sanad Hadis (Studi Kritis Terhadap Pendapat Syuhudi Ismail).” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 15, no. 1 (January 13, 2014): 95. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2014.1501-05.
Ṭaha, Mahmud. Taisir Muṣṭalaḥ Al-Hadiṡ. Iskandariyah: Markaz al-Haza li al-Dirasat, n.d.
Wildana Wargadinata, Haji. Sastra Arab Dan Lintas Budaya. Malang: UIN-Malang Press, 2008.
Zahwu, Abu. Al-Hadīṡ Wa Al-Muhaddiṡin Au Inayah Al-Ummah Al-Islamiyah Bi Al-Sunnah Al-Nabawiyyah. 2nd ed. Riyad: Syirkah al-Ṭabaiyyah al-Arabiyyah al-Su’udiyyah, n.d.
Zuhrani, Abdullah bin Ali bin Muḥammad al-Qadadi. Da’wa Di’fi Al-Syi’ri Fi Asri Sadr Al-Islam Inda Al-Qudama Wa Al-Muhaddisin. Jami’ah Mu’tah, 2007.
Zwettler, Michael. The Oral Tradition of Classical Arabic Poetry Its Character and Implications . Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1978.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Publishing your paper with Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis means that the author or authors retain the copyright in the paper. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis uses license CC-BY-NC-ND or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly works. This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, translate, transform or build upon the material you may use it for private use only and not for distribution. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis granted an exclusive non-commercial reuse license by the author(s), but the author(s) are able to put the paper onto a website, distribute it to colleagues, give it to students, use it in your thesis, etc, so long as the use is not directed at a commercial advantage or toward private monetary gain. The author(s) can reuse the figures and tables and other information contained in their paper published by Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis in future papers or work without having to ask anyone for permission, provided that the figures, tables, or other information that is included in the new paper or work properly references the published paper as the source of the figures, tables or other information, and the new paper or work is not direct at a private monetary gain or commercial advantage.
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis journal Open Acces articles are distrubuted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Article can be read, copy and redistribute the material ini any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.