Rationality in Hadith Textual Criticism According to Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn al-Qayyim: Classifying Muḥālāt and Muḥārāt al-ʿUqūl
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v27i1.7559Keywords:
hadith, textual criticism, rationality, muḥālāt, muḥārātAbstract
Contemporary hadith studies have increasingly emphasized textual criticism, particularly when reports deemed authentic in transmission raise questions at the content level. Although the role of reason is recognized in hadith criticism, existing scholarship has yet to develop a systematic framework that explains how rational considerations apply to matn evaluation. Furthermore, limited attention to distinguishing between muḥālāt al-ʿuqūl (rational impossibilities) and muḥārāt al-ʿuqūl (matters perplexing to reason) creates methodological ambiguity. Therefore, this study aims to examine the concept of al-ʿaql al-ṣarīḥ (sound rationality) and formulate an operational framework for evaluating hadith texts. Employing a qualitative design, this study utilizes textual and comparative analysis of classical and contemporary sources, focusing on the epistemological relationship between revelation and reason. The findings reveal that the proposed framework consists of three principal stages: identifying apparent contradictions, verifying interpretations, and classifying textual issues into muḥālātand muḥārāt al-ʿuqūl. These stages are operationalized through indicators such as general rational judgment, human experience, conformity with sharīʿah principles, and a balance between rational consideration and revelatory authority. Applying this framework to selected hadith reports demonstrates its effectiveness in distinguishing genuine contradictions from limitations in human understanding. This study contributes to hadith textual criticism by providing a systematic, operational model that maintains the epistemological primacy of revelation within contemporary scholarship.
References
Abū Rayyah, Maḥmūd. Aḍwāʾ ʿalā Al-Sunnah Al-Muḥammadiyyah. Cairo: Dār al-Maʿārif, 1957.
Al-Albānī, Muḥammad Nāṣir al-Dīn. Silsilah Al-Aḥādīth Al-Ḍaʿīfah wa Al-Mawḍūʿah. Riyadh: Dār al-Maʿārif, 1992.
Al-Aʿzamī, Musṭafā. “Manhaj Al-Naqd ʿind Al-Muḥaddithīn.” Maktabah al-Kawthar, 1990.
Al-Bukhārī, Muḥammad bin Ismāʿīl. Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī. Cairo: Dār al-Taʾṣīl, 2012.
Al-Dumaynī, Misfar Ghurm Allah. Maqāyīs Naqd Mutūn Al-Sunnah. Riyadh: Jāmiʿah al-Imām Muḥammad bin al-Suʿūd al-Islāmiyyah, 1984.
Al-Ḥamd, Muḥammad bin Ibrāhīm. Muṣṭalaḥāt fī Kutub Al-ʿAqāʾid. Riyadh: Dār Ibn Khuzaymah, 2006.
Al-Idlibī, Aḥmad Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn. Manhaj Naqd Al-Matn ʿind ʿulamāʾ Al-Ḥadīth Al-Nabawī. Cairo: Muʾassasah Iqraʾ al-Khayriyah, 2013.
Al-Jawābī, Muhammad Ṭāhir. Juhūd Al-Muḥaddithīn fī Naqd Al-Matn Al-Hadīth Al-Nabawī Al-Sharīf. Riyadh: Muʾassasāt ʿAbd al-Karīm bin ʿAbdullāh, 1986.
Al-Nawawī, Yaḥyā bin Sharf. Al-Minhāj Sharḥ ʿalā Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Beirut: Dār al-Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1972.
Al-Qaraḍāwī, Yūsuf. Kayfa Nataʿāmul Maʿa Al-Sunnah Al-Nabawiyyah. Cairo: Dār al-Shurūq, 2002.
Al-Shāṭibī, Ibrāhīm bin Mūsā. Al-Muwāfaqāt. Dār Ibn ʿAffan, 1997.
Al-Shīrāzī, Nāṣir Makārim. Al-Amthal fī Tafsīr Kitāb Allāh Al-Munzal. Beirut: Muʾassasah al-Aʿlamī, 2013.
Al-Suyūṭī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān bin Abū Bakar. Tadrīb Al-Rāwī fī Sharḥ Taqrīb Al-Nawawī. Riyadh: Dār Ṭaybah, 2004.
Al-Tirmidhī, Muḥammad bin ʿīsā. Al-Jāmiʿ Al-Kabīr. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 1996.
Al-Turkī, ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbd al-Muḥsin. Mujmal Iʿtiqād Aʾimmah Al-Salaf. Riyadh: Wizārat al-Shuʾūn al-Islāmiyyah wa al-Awqāf wa al-Daʿwah wa al-Irshād, 1996.
Al-ʿAklūk, ʿAbd al-Laṭīf ibn Riyāḍ ibn ʿAbd al-Laṭīf. “Manhaj al-Muʿtazilah fī Tawḥīd al-Asmāʾ wa al-Ṣifāt: ʿArḍ wa Naqḍ.” Master’s thesis, Islamic University of Gaza, 2011.
Al-ʿAsqalānī, Ibn Ḥajar. Fatḥ Al-Bārī bi Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifah, 1960.
———. Nuzhah Al-Naẓar fī Tawḍīḥ Nukhbah Al-Fikr fī Muṣṭalaḥ Ahl Al-Athar. Damascus: Maṭbaʿah al-Ṣabāḥ, 2000.
Alsuhaymi, Adeeb Obaid, and Fouad Ahmed Atallah. “Reason and Revelation in Ibn Taymiyyah’s Critique of Philosophical Theology: A Contribution to Contemporary Islamic Philosophy of Religion.” Religions 16, no. 7 (June 20, 2025): 809. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/7/809.
Aulia, Raihan Safira, Siti Alfi Aliyah, and M. Rusli. “Metodologi Pemahaman Hadis Rejeksionis-Liberal.” ULIL ALBAB: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin 1, no. 11 (2022): 4088–4095.
Azmi, Mohd Faizul, and Muhammad Rashidi Wahab. “Kedudukan Akal Dalam Pendalilan Akidah.” Jurnal Teknologi 63, no. 1 (July 29, 2013): 31–32. https://journals.utm.my/index.php/jurnalteknologi/article/view/1563.
Bin Salman, Abdul Matin, Yusuf Baihaqi, and Kusnadi. “Redefining Khabar Al-Ahad Based on Rashid Rida’s Rational Approach in Al-Manar.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu al-Qur’an dan Hadis 23, no. 2 (July 30, 2022): 219–236. https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/ushuluddin/alquran/article/view/2812.
Brown, Jonathan A.C. “How We Know Early Ḥadīth Critics Did Matn Criticism and Why It’s So Hard to Find.” Islamic Law and Society 15, no. 2 (2008): 143–184.
Bruinessen, Martin Van, and Julia Day Howell. Sufism and the “Modern” in Islam. London: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd, 2007.
El-Tobgui, Carl Sharif. Ibn Taymiyya on Reason and Revelation: A Study of Darʾ Taʿāruḍ Al-ʿaql Wa-l-Naql. Brill, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1163/j.ctv2gjwv76.
Harris, Khalif Muammar A. “Sekularisasi Etika dan Krisis Moral Masa Kini.” Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam 23, no. 2 (2021): 121–170. https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/afkar/article/view/34353.
Hoover, Jon, and Marwan Abu Ghazaleh Mahajneh. “Theology as Translation: Ibn Taymiyya’s Fatwa Permitting Theology and Its Reception into His Averting the Conflict between Reason and Revealed Tradition (Darʾ Taʿāruḍ Al-ʿAql Wa l-Naql).” The Muslim World 108, no. 1 (January 1, 2018): 40–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12229.
Ibn al-Jawzī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān bin ʿAlī. Al-Mawdūʿāt. Madinah al-Munawwarah: al-Maktabah al-Salafiyah, 1966.
Ibn al-Qayyim, Muḥammad bin Abī Bakr. Al-Manār al-Munīf fī al-Ṣaḥīḥ wa al-Ḍaʿīf. Aleppo: Maktabah Maṭbūʿāt Islāmiyyah, 1970.
———. Al-Rūḥ fī al-Kalām ʿalā Arwāḥ al-Amwāt wa al-Aḥyāʾ bi al-Dalāʾil min al-Kitāb wa al-Sunnah. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1982.
———. Al-Ṣawāʿiq Al-Mursalah fī Rad ʿalā Al-Jahmiyyah wa Al-Muʿaṭilah. Riyadh: Dār al-ʿĀṣimah, 1987.
Ibn Kathīr, Ismā’il ʿUmar. Al-Bidāyah wa Al-Nihāyah. Dār Hijr, 2003.
Ibn Taymiyyah, Aḥmad bin ʿAbd al-Ḥalīm. Darʾ Taʿāruḍ al-ʿAql wa al-Naql. Riyadh: Jāmiʿah Imām Muḥammad bin Saʿūd, 1991.
———. Majmūʿ Al-Fatāwā. Madinah al-Munawwarah: Mujammaʿ al-Malik Fahd, 1995.
———. Minhāj Al-Sunnah Al-Nabawiyyah. Riyadh: Jāmiʿah al-Imām Muḥammad bin Saʿūd al-Islāmiyah, 1986.
Izaddin, Radin Ahmad Taufik Salikin, Akmaliza Abdullah, Muhammad Sobri Faisal, and Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin. “Pendekatan Fiqh Al-Hadith Dalam Aplikasi Syariah: Satu Tinjauan Konseptual.” In 5th International Conference of Postgraduate Students & Academics in Syariah and Law 2025, 104–114. Nilai: Faculty of Syariah and Law, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, 2025.
Krawietz, Birgit, and Georges Tamer. Islamic Theology, Philosophy and Law Debating Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim Al-Jawziyya. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110285406.
Mohd Razak, Nur Muhammad Anas, Mohd Arif Nazri, and Latifah Abdul Majid. “Textual Criticism of Hadith in Contemporary Islamic Thought: A Comparative Analysis of Salafi and Sufi Approaches.” Al-Bayan: Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 23, no. 3 (December 5, 2025): 578–601. https://brill.com/view/journals/jqhs/23/3/article-p578_9.xml.
Mullā al-Qārī, ʿAlī bin Sulṭān. Al-Asrār Al-Marfūʿah fī Al-Akhbār Al-Mawḍūʿah. Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islamī, 1986.
———. Sharḥ Sharḥ Nukhbah Al-Fikr fī Musṭalahāt Ahl Al-Athār. Beirut: Dār al-Arqam, 1994.
Nur Kholis. “Pemikiran Muhammad Rasyid Ridho Tentang Kritik Matan Hadis Nabi Muhammad.” al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies 4, no. 1 SE-Articles (March 11, 2021): 15–30. https://www.al-afkar.com/index.php/Afkar_Journal/article/view/172.
Pinang, Husaen. “Metode Pemahaman Hadis Jaringan Islam Liberal.” Jurnal Ilmiah Tarbiyah Umat 7, no. 2 (2017): 113–138. https://ejournals.ddipolman.ac.id/index.php/jitu/article/view/37.
Ramle, Muhammad Rozaimi, and Sahul Hamid Mohamed Maidin. “Ibn Hibban and The Mudallisin’s Narrations in His Book Al-Sahih: Rule, Motive and Methodology.” Global Journal Al Thaqafah 6, no. 1 (July 12, 2016): 127–139. http://www.gjat.my/gjat062016/10920160601.pdf.
Suryadinata, M. “Kritik Matan Hadis: Klasik Hingga Kontemporer.”Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin 2, no. 2 (April 12, 2020): 111–129. http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/una/article/view/15183.
Wingrā, Shafīq. “Naqd Matn Al-Ḥadīth: Tārīkhhu Wa Maqāyīsuhu Wa Manāhij Al-ʿUlamāʾ Fīhi.” Darul Huda Islamic University, 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nur Muhammad Anas Mohd Razak, Latifah Abdul Majid, Mohd Arif Nazri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Publishing your paper with Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis means that the author or authors retain the copyright in the paper. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis uses license CC-BY-NC-ND or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly works. This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, translate, transform or build upon the material you may use it for private use only and not for distribution. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis granted an exclusive non-commercial reuse license by the author(s), but the author(s) are able to put the paper onto a website, distribute it to colleagues, give it to students, use it in your thesis, etc, so long as the use is not directed at a commercial advantage or toward private monetary gain. The author(s) can reuse the figures and tables and other information contained in their paper published by Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis in future papers or work without having to ask anyone for permission, provided that the figures, tables, or other information that is included in the new paper or work properly references the published paper as the source of the figures, tables or other information, and the new paper or work is not direct at a private monetary gain or commercial advantage.
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis journal Open Acces articles are distrubuted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Article can be read, copy and redistribute the material ini any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
