Competing Grounds of Hadith Authority in the Thought of Kassim Ahmad and M. Syuhudi Ismail in Late-Twentieth-Century Malaysia and Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v27i1.7570Keywords:
hadith authority, Kassim Ahmad, M. Syuhudi Ismail, religious authority, Malaysia and IndonesiaAbstract
Modern debates about hadith are often organized through the binary of rejection and defense. That classification identifies polemical positions but obscures the different standards by which prophetic reports are made religiously binding. This article compares Kassim Ahmad and M. Syuhudi Ismail as two parallel, asymmetrical projects in late twentieth century Malaysia and Indonesia. Using qualitative document analysis, contextual close reading, directed content analysis, and structured-focused comparison, it examines seven primary works through five dimensions: foundational norm, status of hadith, validation procedure, authorized mediator, and normative reach. The analysis finds that Kassim does not deny the possible historical existence of reports about the Prophet; he subordinates their authority to Qur’anic, historical, and rational adjudication and treats them as defeasible historical precedents. Syuhudi, by contrast, preserves hadith as a normative source while conditioning its acceptance and application on disciplined sanad-matn criticism, identification of the Prophet's function, and contextual interpretation. Both projects reject unexamined reception, but they assign final jurisdiction to different procedures and forms of competence. The comparison therefore reframes modern hadith controversy as a contest over how authority is organized rather than a simple conflict between tradition and reason.
References
Afwadzi, Benny. “Epistemologi Inkar Al-Sunnah: Telaah Pemikiran Kassim Ahmad.” Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir 1, no. 2 (2018): 121–144.
Ahmad, Kassim. Hadis: Jawapan kepada Pengkritik. Kuala Lumpur: Media Indah, 1992.
———. Hadis: Satu Penilaian Semula. Petaling Jaya, Selangor: Media Intelek, 1986.
———. Hadith: A Re-Evaluation. Translated by Syed Akbar Ali. Tucson, AZ: Monotheist Productions International; Fremont, CA: Universal Unity, 1997.
———. “Author’s Preface to This Translation.” In “HADITH—A Re-Evaluation.” April 26, 2006. Accessed July 17, 2026. https://kassimahmad.blogspot.com/2006/04/hadith-re-evaluation-kassim-ahmad.html.
———. “Hadith: A Re-Evaluation—Where Have We Gone Wrong?” May 8, 2006. Accessed July 17, 2026. https://kassimahmad.blogspot.com/2006/05/hadith-re-evaluation-where-have-we.html.
———. “Hadis: Jawapan Kepada Pengritik #5.” November 2, 2006. Accessed July 17, 2026. https://kassimahmad.blogspot.com/2006/.
———. “Hadis: Satu Penilaian Semula #17: Bab IV—Kritikan terhadap Hadis.” July 3, 2008. Accessed July 17, 2026. https://kassimahmad.blogspot.com/2008/07/hadis-satu-penilaian-semula-17-bab-iv.html.
———. “Hadis: Satu Penilaian Semula #18: Kelemahan Kritikan Isnad.” July 6, 2008. Accessed July 17, 2026. https://kassimahmad.blogspot.com/2008/07/hadis-satu-penilaian-semula-18-bab-iv.html.
———. “Hadis: Satu Penilaian Semula #22: Kontradiksi dengan Sains, Sejarah dan Akal.” August 17, 2008. Accessed July 17, 2026. https://kassimahmad.blogspot.com/2008/08/.
Alatas, Ismail Fajrie. What Is Religious Authority? Cultivating Islamic Communities in Indonesia. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691204314.001.0001.
Ali, Izwan Mohd, and Aminudin Basir@Ahmad. “Kassim Ahmad’s Thought on Hadith and the Factors of Rejection to Its Authority.” Al-Hikmah 16, no. 2 (2024): 118–141. https://doi.org/10.17576/alhikmah.2024.1602/527.
Amrulloh. “Kontribusi M. Syuhudi Ismail dalam Kontekstualisasi Pemahaman Hadis.” Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith 7, no. 1 (2017): 76–104. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2017.7.1.76-104.
Aseri, Mukhsin, Muhammad Rasyid, Ahmad Sharifuddin bin Mustapha, Akh Fauzi Aseri, and Oleh Fedorchenko. “Negotiating Authority and Knowledge: Religion, Science, and Politics in the Fatwa Transformations of the Indonesian Ulema Council.” Journal of Islamic Law 6, no. 2 (August 2025): 286–316. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v6i2.4702.
Bahrudin, Mohamad Khalid, Ishak Suliaman, and Mohamad Azrien Mohamed Adnan. “The Reality and Challenges of Authoritative Regulation on Hadith Publication in Malaysia and Indonesia.” Jurnal Usuluddin 51, no. 1 (2023): 81–114. https://doi.org/10.22452/usuluddin.vol51no1.4.
Bhojani, Ali-Reza, and Morgan Clarke. “Religious Authority beyond Domination and Discipline: Epistemic Authority and Its Vernacular Uses in the Shi‘i Diaspora.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 65, no. 2 (2023): 272–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417522000470.
Bowen, Glenn A. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9, no. 2 (2009): 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027.
Brown, Daniel W. Rethinking Tradition in Modern Islamic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Choirin, Muhammad, Ainal Mardhiah, Saiful Bahri, Hadiyan Hadiyan, and Laila Yumna. “Mapping the Evolution of Islamic Da’wah in Indonesia: A Bibliometric Analysis and Future Research Directions.” Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun 13, no. 1 (January 2025): 547–68. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v13i1.1319.
Darussamin, Zikri. “Kassim Ahmad Pelopor Inkar Sunnah di Malaysia.” Al-Fikra: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman 8, no. 1 (2009): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.24014/af.v8i1.3802.
Fithoroini, Dayan. “Hadis Nabi yang Tekstual dan Kontekstual: Analisis Pemikiran Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail.” Nabawi: Journal of Hadith Studies 2, no. 1 (2021): 116–140. https://doi.org/10.55987/njhs.v2i1.42.
George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.
Habib, Irham. “Standar Keshahihan Hadis Menurut Syuhudi Ismail.” El-Sunan: Journal of Hadith and Religious Studies 1, no. 1 (2023): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.22373/el-sunan.v1i1.3454.
Ilyas, Fithriady, and Ishak bin Hj. Suliaman. “Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail (1943–1995): Tokoh Hadith Prolifik, Ensiklopedik dan Ijtihad.” Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura 17, no. 1 (2017): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v17i1.1604.
Ismail, M. Syuhudi. Hadis Nabi Menurut Pembela, Pengingkar, dan Pemalsunya. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1995.
———. Hadis Nabi yang Tekstual dan Kontekstual: Telaah Ma‘ani al-Hadits tentang Ajaran Islam yang Universal, Temporal, dan Lokal. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1994.
———. Kaedah Kesahihan Sanad Hadis: Telaah Kritis dan Tinjauan dengan Pendekatan Ilmu Sejarah. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1988.
———. Kaedah Kesahihan Sanad Hadis: Telaah Kritis dan Tinjauan dengan Pendekatan Ilmu Sejarah. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1995. Online transcription. Accessed July 24, 2026. https://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/kmi/hadits/kaidah/Lengkap.html.
———. Metodologi Penelitian Hadis Nabi. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1992.
Khotimah, Husnul. “Urgensi Kajian Hadis di Indonesia: Pemikiran M. Syuhudi Ismail dan Ali Mustafa Ya’qub.” DIRAYAH: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis 3, no. 2 (2023): 188–206. https://doi.org/10.62359/dirayah.v3i02.128.
Makmur, Muhammad Ismail, and Burhanuddin. “Metode Kesahihan Sanad Hadis: Telaah terhadap Pemikiran Syuhudi Ismail dalam Kaidah Kesahihan Hadits.” AL-MUTSLA 3, no. 2 (2021): 85–95. https://doi.org/10.46870/jstain.v3i2.50.
Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2020.
Muchtar, Chaliq. “Hadits dalam Sorotan di Malaysia: Studi tentang Pemikiran Dr. Kassim Ahmad terhadap Hadits.” Al-Jami‘ah 43 (1990): 78–102. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.1990.043.78-102.
Musa, Aisha Y. Hadith as Scripture: Discussions on the Authority of Prophetic Traditions in Islam. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230611979.
Nasrulloh, Muhammad, and Doli Witro. “Pemikiran Syuhudi Ismail tentang Paradigma Hadis Tekstual dan Kontekstual: Sebuah Tinjauan Umum.” An-Nida’ 46, no. 1 (2022): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.24014/an-nida.v46i1.19226.
Pocock, J. G. A. Politics, Language, and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
Saldaña, Johnny. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2021.
Schreier, Margrit. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. London: SAGE, 2012.
Skinner, Quentin. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8, no. 1 (1969): 3–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/2504188.
Suaidi, Hasan. “Hermeneutika Hadis Syuhudi Ismail.” Religia 20, no. 1 (2017): 33–48. https://doi.org/10.28918/religia.v20i1.837.
Syamsuddin, Sahiron. “Kaidah Kemuttasilan Sanad Hadis: Studi Kritis terhadap Pendapat Syuhudi Ismail.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis 15, no. 1 (2014): 95–112. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2014.1501-05.
Wan Razali, Wan Mohd Fazrul Azdi, Mohd Rumaizuddin Ghazali, Mohd Azhar Ibrahim Resedi, and Fikri Muharam. “Elemen Anti Hadis dalam Ucapan kepada Konferensi Politik Nasional oleh Kassim Ahmad: Satu Penilaian.” ‘Abqari Journal 6, no. 1 (2015): 7–34. https://doi.org/10.33102/abqari.vol6no1.431.
Zagzebski, Linda Trinkaus. Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199936472.001.0001.
Zaman, Muhammad Qasim. Modern Islamic Thought in a Radical Age: Religious Authority and Internal Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973062.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abbas Langaji, Nur Laili Nabilah Nazahah Najiyah, Saifuddin Zuhri Qudsy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Publishing your paper with Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis means that the author or authors retain the copyright in the paper. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis uses license CC-BY-NC-ND or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly works. This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, translate, transform or build upon the material you may use it for private use only and not for distribution. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis granted an exclusive non-commercial reuse license by the author(s), but the author(s) are able to put the paper onto a website, distribute it to colleagues, give it to students, use it in your thesis, etc, so long as the use is not directed at a commercial advantage or toward private monetary gain. The author(s) can reuse the figures and tables and other information contained in their paper published by Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis in future papers or work without having to ask anyone for permission, provided that the figures, tables, or other information that is included in the new paper or work properly references the published paper as the source of the figures, tables or other information, and the new paper or work is not direct at a private monetary gain or commercial advantage.
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis journal Open Acces articles are distrubuted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Article can be read, copy and redistribute the material ini any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
