What the Qur’an Rules Out: Mā Kāna Constructions and the Rhetoric of Restriction in The Qur’an
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v27i1.7638Keywords:
Qur'anic rhetoric, ma kana, restriction, formulaic rhetoric, classical tafsīrAbstract
A translation that treats every Qur’anic mā kāna clause as a report that something “did not happen” misses the work performed by many of these passages. Some rule out conduct, others deny a right or autonomous power, and still others reject claims about God or the course of divine action. This article examines these differences across the Qur’an. A search of a verse-indexed Arabic text identified 213 candidate sequences; morphological and syntactic screening narrowed them to 127 negative clauses and a core of 37 instances in 36 verses. Close reading of clause structure, subject, complement, exceptions, local argument, classical grammar, iʿrāb, and tafsīr reveals no single meaning of prohibition or impossibility. Instead, the clauses restrict propositions on different grounds: communal norm, prophetic office, legitimate standing, created agency, divine permission, doctrinal propriety, divine justice, and a narrated history of refusal. Grammatical form guides these readings but does not determine them apart from context. Repeated mā kāna clauses therefore form a rhetoric of restriction: they mark what may not properly be done, claimed, attributed, or expected within Qur’anic discourse.
References
Abdel Haleem, M. A. S. “Grammatical Shift for Rhetorical Purposes: Iltifāt and Related Features in the Qur’an.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 55, no. 3 (1992): 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00003621.
Abdel Haleem, M. A. S. “The Role of Context in Interpreting and Translating the Qur’an.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 20, no. 1 (2018): 47–66. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2018.0320.
Abdel Haleem, Muhammad. Understanding the Qur’an: Themes and Style. London: I.B. Tauris, 2010.
Abdul-Raof, Hussein. Qur’an Translation: Discourse, Texture and Exegesis. Richmond: Curzon, 2001.
Al-Saaidi, Sawsan Kareem, Ghayth K. Shaker Al-Shaibani, and Hashim A. Mohammed Al-Husseini. “Speech Act of Prohibition in English and Arabic: A Contrastive Study on Selected Biblical and Quranic Verses.” Arab World English Journal 4, no. 4 (2013): 95–111.
An, Andri Nirwana, Yeti Dahliana, Ainur Rhain, Kharis Nugroho, Ahmad Nurrahim, Alfiyatul Azizah, and Zainora Daud. “Mapping Quranic Exegesis Research: Trends, Contributions, And Future Directions.” Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun 13, no. 1 (January 2025): 319–50. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v13i1.1250.
Asnawi, Aqdi Rofiq, Husein Aziz, and Achmad Murtafi Haris. “Investigating Cohesiveness of QS. Al-Mā’idah: A Review on Michel Cuypers Implementation of Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA).” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis 23, no. 1 (2022): 49–68. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2022.2301-03.
Asnawi, Aqdi Rofiq, Mahmud Rifaannudin, Deki Ridho Adi Anggara, and Oky Ayu Agustin. “Rhetorical Coherence and Eco-Theological Meaning in Qur’anic Water Verses: A Disciplined Semitic Rhetorical Analysis.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis 27, no. 1 (2026): 273–302. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v27i1.6716.
Badawi, Elsaid M., and Muhammad Abdel Haleem. Arabic-English Dictionary of Qurʾanic Usage. Leiden: Brill, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004149489.i-1069.
Boullata, Issa J., ed. Literary Structures of Religious Meaning in the Qur’an. Richmond: Curzon, 2000.
Christiansen, Johanne Louise. “The Educational Qur’an: ‘Maybe You Will Understand’ (la‘allakum ta‘qilūn).” Numen 66, nos. 5–6 (2019): 550–579. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685276-12341554.
Christiansen, Johanne Louise. “God Loves Not the Wrongdoers (ẓālimūn): Formulaic Repetition as a Rhetorical Strategy in the Qur’an.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 22, no. 1 (2020): 92–132. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2020.0413.
Cuypers, Michel. The Composition of the Qur’an: Rhetorical Analysis. Translated by Jerry Ryan. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.
Dror, Yehudit, and Eyhab Abdulrazak Bader Eddin. “Qur’anic Exceptive Phrases: The Case of the ’in … ’illā Construction.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 174, no. 1 (2024): 133–150. https://doi.org/10.13173/ZDMG.174.1.133.
Dror, Yehudit, Salam Saied, and Bayan Amara. “The Grammar of Emotion Verbs in the Qur’an: A Case Study of the Verb Xāfa.” Journal of Semitic Studies 69, no. 2 (2024): 869–896. https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgae021.
Dukes, Kais, and Nizar Habash. “Morphological Annotation of Quranic Arabic.” In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10). Valletta, Malta: European Language Resources Association, 2010. https://aclanthology.org/L10-1190/.
Dukes, Kais, Eric Atwell, and Abdul-Baquee M. Sharaf. “Syntactic Annotation Guidelines for the Quranic Arabic Dependency Treebank.” In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10). Valletta, Malta: European Language Resources Association, 2010. https://aclanthology.org/L10-1192/.
Dukes, Kais, Eric Atwell, and Nizar Habash. “Supervised Collaboration for Syntactic Annotation of Quranic Arabic.” Language Resources and Evaluation 47, no. 1 (2013): 33–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-011-9167-7.
El-Awa, Salwa. “Repetition in the Qur’an: A Relevance-Based Explanation of the Phenomenon.” Islamic Studies 42, no. 4 (2003): 577–593.
El-Awa, Salwa M. Textual Relations in the Qur’an: Relevance, Coherence and Structure. London: Routledge, 2006.
Fischer, Wolfdietrich. A Grammar of Classical Arabic. 3rd rev. ed. Translated by Jonathan Rodgers. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002.
Hoffmann, Thomas. “The Appealing Qur’an: On the Rhetorical Strategy of Vocatives and Interpellation in the Qur’an.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 22, no. 1 (2020): 5–30. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2020.0409.
Ibn ‘Āshūr, Muḥammad al-Ṭāhir. Al-Taḥrīr wa-l-Tanwīr. 30 vols. Tunis: al-Dār al-Tūnisiyya li-l-Nashr, 1984.
Ibn Hishām al-Anṣārī, ‘Abd Allāh ibn Yūsuf. Mughnī al-Labīb ‘an Kutub al-A‘ārīb. Edited by Māzin al-Mubārak and Muḥammad ‘Alī Ḥamd Allāh. 6th ed. 2 vols. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 1985.
Khālid al-Azharī, Zayn al-Dīn. Sharḥ al-Taṣrīḥ ‘alā al-Tawḍīḥ. 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya, 2000.
Klar, Marianna, ed. Structural Dividers in the Qur’an. Abingdon: Routledge, 2021.
Mårtensson, Ulrika. “Prophetic Clarity: A Comparative Approach to al-Ṭabarī’s Theory of Qur’anic Language, Rhetoric, and Composition.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 22, no. 1 (2020): 216–268. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2020.0417.
Al-Murādī, al-Ḥasan ibn Qāsim. Al-Janā al-Dānī fī Ḥurūf al-Ma‘ānī. Edited by Fakhr al-Dīn Qabāwa and Muḥammad Nadīm Fāḍil. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya, 1992.
Quranic Arabic Corpus. “Word by Word Grammar, Syntax and Morphology of the Holy Quran.” Accessed July 17, 2026. https://corpus.quran.com/.
Robinson, Neal. Discovering the Qur’an: A Contemporary Approach to a Veiled Text. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2004.
Al-Samīn al-Ḥalabī, Aḥmad ibn Yūsuf. Al-Durr al-Maṣūn fī ‘Ulūm al-Kitāb al-Maknūn. Edited by Aḥmad Muḥammad al-Kharrāṭ. 11 vols. Damascus: Dār al-Qalam, 1986–1994.
Samji, Karim. The Qurʾān: A Form-Critical History. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110580884.
Sībawayh, ‘Amr ibn ‘Uthmān. Al-Kitāb. Edited by ‘Abd al-Salām Muḥammad Hārūn. 3rd ed. 4 vols. Cairo: Maktabat al-Khānjī, 1988.
Van der Auwera, Johan, and Vladimir A. Plungian. “Modality’s Semantic Map.” Linguistic Typology 2, no. 1 (1998): 79–124. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79.
van Putten, Marijn. Quranic Arabic: From Its Hijazi Origins to Its Classical Reading Traditions. Leiden: Brill, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004506251.
Wathani, Syamsul, Habib Ismail, and Akhmad Mughzi Abdillah. “Reconstruction of Women’s Fiqh: An Analysis of Muhammad Shahrūr’s Contemporary Reading in a Hermeneutic Perspective.” Journal of Islamic Law 3, no. 2 (August 2022): 159–75. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v3i2.860.
Younes, Essam Abdelanby. “A Critical Comparative Study of the English Renderings of the Prohibitive Construction ‘Ma Kana’ in the Qur’an: A Functional Equivalence Perspective.” Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies 9, no. 4 (2025): 150–161. https://doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol9no4.12.
Al-Zajjājī, Abū al-Qāsim ‘Abd al-Raḥmān ibn Isḥāq. Kitāb al-Lāmāt. Edited by Māzin al-Mubārak. 2nd ed. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 1985.
Zebiri, Kate. “Towards a Rhetorical Criticism of the Qur’an.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 5, no. 2 (2003): 95–120. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2003.5.2.95.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Shohib, Muhammad Azizan Fitriana, Ade Naelul Huda, Sabri Mohamad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Publishing your paper with Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis means that the author or authors retain the copyright in the paper. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis uses license CC-BY-NC-ND or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly works. This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, translate, transform or build upon the material you may use it for private use only and not for distribution. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis granted an exclusive non-commercial reuse license by the author(s), but the author(s) are able to put the paper onto a website, distribute it to colleagues, give it to students, use it in your thesis, etc, so long as the use is not directed at a commercial advantage or toward private monetary gain. The author(s) can reuse the figures and tables and other information contained in their paper published by Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis in future papers or work without having to ask anyone for permission, provided that the figures, tables, or other information that is included in the new paper or work properly references the published paper as the source of the figures, tables or other information, and the new paper or work is not direct at a private monetary gain or commercial advantage.
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis journal Open Acces articles are distrubuted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Article can be read, copy and redistribute the material ini any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
