Management of Indonesian Language Learning for Foreign Speakers (BIPA) at Islamic Religious Higher Education Institutions (PTKI) in Indonesia and Thailand

Main Article Content

Siti Isnaniah
Islahuddin

Abstract

This study aims to compare the management of Indonesian language learning for foreign speakers (BIPA) at PTKI (Indonesian Language Education/TBI IAIN Surakarta) and the Indonesian Language Concentration (KBI) Department of Malay Language (JBM), Fatoni University (FTU), Thailand from the aspects of the curriculum, institutions, teaching materials, instructors, students, and methods. This study uses a descriptive-analytic method with a qualitative approach. Sources of data are informants (BIPA instructors; BIPA managers; managers of the Indonesian Language Program; Indonesian Language Concentration, Department of Malay Language, Fatoni University of Thailand, and Thai students). The results of the study show that teaching Indonesian abroad and domestically is successful because it is proven by the increasing pace of Indonesian language study by foreigners abroad. This has not only occurred at the institutional level of the BIPA program, but it has also led to majors, such as the Indonesian Language Concentration at the University of Malay Language Department. Fatoni Thailand. Meanwhile, the number of students in the PTKI Indonesian Language Program is increasing annually, and International students are increasingly interested in studying at the PTKI TBI Program. The increasing development of teaching Indonesian domestically and abroad requires ideal learning management (curriculum, instructors, institutions, students, teaching materials, and methods). TBI IAIN Surakarta and KBI JBM FTU Thailand appeared to successfully manage Indonesian language learning, although there are slight differences between the two. In terms of curriculum, instructors, institutions, students, teaching materials, and methods, learning Indonesian at TBI IAIN Surakarta is more comprehensive and ready. Therefore, intensive coordination between the two is needed because both are Islamic-based PTKIs to support the Indonesian language's internationalization by making Indonesian as the host in their own country and honored guests in other countries. This paper provides a broad view of BIPA learning management in Islamic higher education institutions in Southeast Asia because not many Islamic Higher Education Institutions in Southeast Asia have BIPA. Therefore, further studies are required on the developments (R & D) related to curriculum, instructors, institutions, students, teaching materials, and methods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Isnaniah, S., & Islahuddin. (2020). Management of Indonesian Language Learning for Foreign Speakers (BIPA) at Islamic Religious Higher Education Institutions (PTKI) in Indonesia and Thailand. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2020.91.1-27
Section
Articles

References

Andayani. “Inovasi Model Pembelajaran Untuk Mengakselerasi Peran Bahasa Indonesia Di Ranah Internasional.” Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar. Surakarta, n.d.

Cintamulya, Imas. “Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills with Reflective and Impulsive Cognitive Styles on Conservation and Environmental Knowledge Learning.” Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching 20, no. 1 (August 2019).

Griffin, Ricky W. Manajemen. Edited by Wisnu Candra Kristiaji. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2004.

Leksono, Robertus Pujo. “Indonesian as a Foreign Language Teaching in Thailand.” In Konferensi Internasional Pengajar BIPA (KIPBIPA IX), 2015.

Muhaimin, Suti’ah, and Sugeng Listyo Prabowo. Manajemen Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2012.

Muliastuti, Liliana. Bahasa Indonesia Bagi Penutur Asing. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2017.

Mumpuniarti, Mumpuniarti, Rendy Roos Handoyo, Diajeng Tyas Pinrupitanza, and Dewi Barotuttaqiyah. “Teacher’s Pedagogy Competence and Challenges in Implementing Inclusive Learning in Slow Learner.” Cakrawala Pendidikan 39, no. 1 (February 28, 2020): 217–29. doi:10.21831/cp.v39i1.28807.

“No Title,” 2020.

Perguruan Tinggi Indonesia Diminati Mahasiswa Asing – Kemenristek. “Siaran Pers,” May 12, 2017. https://www.ristekbrin.go.id/siaran-pers/perguruan-tinggi-indonesia-diminati-mahasiswa-asing-2/#dbwDmPsLAu5o8tYr.99.

Pidarta, Made. Manajemen Pendidikan Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2004.

Pt Apita, Ni, Widya Sari, Md Sutama, I Dw, Gd Budi, Utama Jurusan, Pendidikan Bahasa, Dan Sastra, Indonesia Fakultas Bahasa, and Dan Seni. “Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Bagi Penutur Asing (BIPA) Di Sekolah Cinta Bahasa, Ubud, Bali.” Journal Prodi Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, Undiksha 5, no. 3 (November 1, 2016): 2016. doi:10.23887/JJPBS.V5I3.8635.

Rahman, Abdul, Idi Warsah, and Ali Murfi. “Islamic Education System in Singapore: Current Issues and Challenges.” Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 8, no. 2 (February 14, 2020): 197–222. doi:10.14421/jpi.2019.82.197-222.

Suyitno, Imam, Gatut Susanto, Musthofa Kamal, and Ary Fawzi. “Cognitive Learning Strategy of BIPA Students in Learning the Indonesian Language.” IAFOR Journal of Language Learning 3, no. 2 (January 19, 2018). doi:10.22492/ijll.3.2.08.

Tawandorloh, Ku-Ares. “The Urgency of Teaching BIPA in the Melayu Department in Fatoni University.” In Abstact Book of LATU International Conference. Bangkok, 2018.

Tawandorloh, Ku-Ares, and Islahuddin. “Effectiveness of BIPA Learning in Indonesian Concentration Students, Fatoni University, Thailand.” In Prosiding Seminar Internasional Konferensi BIPA Tahunan (Ke-BIPA-an) II Tahun 2019. Surakarta, 2019.

The Management of TBI PTKI Program. “No Title.” 2020.