Integration of Digital Technology in Islamic Religious Education Learning: A Qualitative Study on Teachers’ Competence and Implementation Models in Secondary Schools

Main Article Content

Diyah Mintasih
Sukiman Sukiman
Sigit Purnama

Abstract

Purpose – The advancement of digital technology has significantly transformed the field of education, including Islamic Religious Education (PAI) learning. In Indonesia, the increasing number of internet users and the adoption of technological devices reflect a broad digital transformation. The Merdeka Belajar program demonstrates the government's commitment to digitizing education, including PAI. However, in rural areas such as Gunungkidul Regency, integrating technology into PAI learning still faces challenges, such as limited infrastructure readiness and teachers’ digital competence. Therefore, this study aims to identify the level of digital technology utilization in PAI learning, evaluate teachers’ digital competence, analyze the impact of technology integration on learning effectiveness, and develop a digital technology integration model relevant to the local context.


Design/methods/approach – This study employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. Data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, documentation, and surveys involving 30 PAI teachers from 19 senior high schools (SMA) in Gunungkidul Regency, selected using a purposive sampling technique. The analysis is based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) frameworks to understand technology acceptance and teachers’ digital competence.


Findings – The findings indicate that the utilization of digital technology in PAI learning is relatively widespread, with platforms such as Google Classroom, Moodle, and Edmodo being used. However, there are still gaps in infrastructure and teachers’ digital competence, particularly in creating interactive digital content. Most teachers still rely on simple presentation media and have not fully optimized technology for innovative learning. The integration of technology has been proven to enhance accessibility and interactivity in learning; however, it also poses challenges such as students’ dependency on technology and the limited training opportunities for teachers. To address these challenges, this study proposes a technology integration model that focuses on improving teachers’ digital competence, ensuring equitable infrastructure distribution, developing digital content, and implementing a hybrid learning model.


Research implications – The findings provide recommendations for teachers, policymakers, and educational institutions to enhance the effectiveness of digital-based PAI learning. Several strategic steps are proposed, including intensive training for teachers in digital content creation, equalizing access to technology in remote areas, and implementing a hybrid learning model that combines conventional methods with digital technology. Furthermore, improving students’ digital literacy is also a crucial step to ensure that the integration of technology in PAI learning goes beyond mere accessibility and fosters a deeper understanding of Islamic values.

Downloads

Article Details

How to Cite
Mintasih, D., Sukiman, S., & Purnama, S. (2024). Integration of Digital Technology in Islamic Religious Education Learning: A Qualitative Study on Teachers’ Competence and Implementation Models in Secondary Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 13(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2024.131.85-96
Section
Articles

References

Arantes, J. (2022). The SAMR Model as a Framework for Scaffolding Online Chat: A Theoretical Discussion of the SAMR Model as a Research Method during These ‘Interesting’ Times. Qualitative Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-08-2021-0088

Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: Practical Strategies. Sage.

Blyznyuk, T. (2019). Formation of Teachers’ Digital Competence: Domestic Challenges and Foreign Experience. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 5(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.5.1.40-46

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

British Educational Research Association (BERA). (2018). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches (4th Edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry Research Design. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53).

Dzulkifli, I. (2021). Teaching and Learning Aids to Support the Deaf Students Studying Islamic Education. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(4), 2263–2279. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.4.09

Hasnida, S. S., Adrian, R., & Siagian, N. A. (2024). Education Transformation in the Digital Era. Journal of Indonesian Education Stars (JUBPI), 2(1), 110–116.

Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research Ethics for Social Scientists. Sage.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Permendikbud Tentang Standar Isi Pada PAUD, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications.

Lase, D. (2019). Pendidikan Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. SUNDERMANN: Jurnal Ilmiah Teologi, Pendidikan, Sains, Humaniora Dan Kebudayaan, 12(2), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.36588/sundermann.v1i1.18

Lazim, C. S., Ismail, N. D. B., & Tazilah, M. D. A. K. (2021). Application of Technology Acceptance Model (Tam) towards Online Learning during Covid-19 Pandemic: Accounting Students Perspective. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 24(1), 13–20.

Lubis, L., & Asry, W. (2020). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam Pengembangan. Bumi Aksara.

Marzuki, I., & Syahrial, Z. (2020). How to Develop Blended Learning Educational Evaluation Courses Islamic Religious Education Study Program. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3A), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081404

Masrom, M. (2007). Technology Acceptance Model and E-Learning. 21–24.

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia Learning. Multimedia Learning, 41, 85–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-7421(02)80005-6

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th, Ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610

Muhaimin, A., Mujib, A., & Nurhasanah. (2017). Paradigma Pendidikan Islam: Upaya Mengefektifkan Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Sekolah. Remaja Rosdakarya. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Paradigma_pendidikan_Islam.html?id=OwGSAAAACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Mukrimaa, S. S., Nurdyansyah, Fahyuni, E. F., Citra, A. Y., Schulz, N. D., غسان, د., Taniredja, T., Faridli, E. M., & Harmianto, S. (2016). Pengaruh Teknologi Digital Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 6, 128.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Ramayulis. (2015). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Kalam Mulia.

Ridjaludin, F. N. (2008). Agama dan pengaruhnya dalam kehidupan: Pandangan dari sudut psikologi Islam. RIDJALUDDIN, F. N.

Sholihah, A. M., & Maulida, W. Z. (2020). Pendidikan Islam sebagai Fondasi Pendidikan Karakter. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v12i01.214

Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant Observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Sprenger, D. A., & Schwaninger, A. (2021). Technology Acceptance of Four Digital Learning Technologies (Classroom Response System, Classroom Chat, E‑lectures, and Mobile Virtual Reality) after Three Months’ Usage. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(8), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00243-4

Vygotsky, L. S., Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. V. (2016). The Scientists’ Bookshelf? THE BIOLOGY 9 OF THE. 67(4).

We Are Social. (2023). https://wearesocial.com/id/people/

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yusuf, R. (2020). Pendekatan Multimedia Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. EduTech Press.

Zahro, D. A., & Nugraha, J. (2021). Analysis Of The Use Of Mendeley Using The Technology Acceptance Model (Tam) Approach: Study In Students Of Office Administration Education In Surabaya State University. Jurnal TAM (Technology Acceptance Model). https://doi.org/10.56327/jurnaltam.v12i1.1014

Zaineldeen, S. & et al. (2020). Technology Acceptance Model’ Concepts, Contribution, Limitation, and Adoption in Education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5061–5071. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081106