Studi Perbandingan Regulasi Hukum bagi Pekerja Ekonomi Gig di Sektor Transportasi : Indonesia dan California
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/tfkj5t58Keywords:
Gig Economy, Transportation Sector, Worker Classification, Legal Protection, Indonesia, CaliforniaAbstract
This study compares the legal protections for gig workers in Indonesia and California. In Indonesia, the majority of gig workers are classified as partners, which means they do not receive adequate labor protections as stipulated in Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021. In contrast, California implements the ABC5 test, which provides a clearer legal framework for classifying workers as employees or independent contractors. This study employs a comparative legal method to analyze the differences in treatment of gig workers in both regions. The results indicate that the partnership model in Indonesia is detrimental to workers and makes them vulnerable, while the ABC5 test in California provides better protection, despite the challenges in its implementation. Based on these findings, the study recommends that Indonesia immediately develop specific regulations for gig workers. These regulations are expected to provide legal certainty and more adequate labor protection for gig workers as the digital economy grows.
Penelitian ini membandingkan perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja gig di Indonesia dan California. Di Indonesia, mayoritas pekerja gig diklasifikasikan sebagai mitra, sehingga tidak mendapat perlindungan ketenagakerjaan yang memadai seperti diatur dalam PP Nomor 35 Tahun 2021. Sebaliknya, California menerapkan uji ABC5 yang memberikan kerangka hukum lebih jelas untuk mengklasifikasi pekerja sebagai karyawan atau kontraktor independen. Studi ini menggunakan metode hukum perbandingan untuk menganalisis perbedaan perlakuan terhadap pekerja gig di kedua wilayah. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa model kemitraan di Indonesia merugikan pekerja dan membuat mereka rentan, sementara uji ABC5 di California memberikan perlindungan lebih baik meskipun ada tantangan implementasi. Berdasarkan temuan ini, penelitian merekomendasikan agar Indonesia segera menyusun regulasi spesifik untuk pekerja gig. Regulasi ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan yang lebih memadai bagi pekerja gig seiring dengan pertumbuhan ekonomi digital.
Downloads
References
Amelia Yesidora. (2024, September 3). Kominfo Sudah Bertemu Gojek, Grab hingga Shopee Bahas Tuntutan Ojol . Katadata.com. https://katadata.co.id/digital/startup/66d6841e24eda/kominfo-sudah-bertemu-gojek-grab-hingga-shopee-bahas-tuntutan-ojol
Andrew Hanson, C. S. M. S. M. de Z. and S. M. (2024, April 15). Underemployment and Its Long-Term Effects for College Graduates. Higher Education Today. https://www.higheredtoday.org/2024/04/15/underemployment-and-its-long-term-effects-for-college-graduates/
Annette Bernhardt, & Sarah Thomason. (2017). What Do We Know About Gig Work in California? An Analysis of Independent Contracting. https://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/pdf/2017/What-Do-We-Know-About-Gig-Work-in-California.pdf
Arif Novianto. (2021, June 20). The partnership trap in the Indonesian gig economy. Developing Economics. https://developingeconomics.org/2021/06/20/the-partnership-trap-in-the-indonesian-gig-economy/
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Indikator Pekerjaan Layak di Indonesia 2020 (1; 1).
Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2023, June 30). Gross Domestic Product by State and Personal Income by State, 4th Quarter 2022 and Year 2022 | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. https://www.bea.gov/news/2023/gross-domestic-product-state-and-personal-income-state-4th-quarter-2022-and-year-2022
Cade Metz. (2022, September 12). Uber Agrees to Pay N.J. $100 Million in Dispute Over Drivers’ Employment Status (Published 2022). The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/12/technology/uber-new-jersey-settlement.html
De Ruyter, A., & Rachmawati, R. (2020). Understanding the Working Conditions of Gig Workers and Decent Work: Evidence from Indonesia’s online Ojek Riders. Sozialpolitik.Ch, 2/2020. https://doi.org/10.18753/2297-8224-159
Departement of Industrial Relation (DIR). (2019, December 12). Miclassification - DIR Fraud Prevention. Departement of Industrial Relation (DIR)California. https://www.dir.ca.gov/Fraud_Prevention/Misclassification.htm
Dubal, V. B. (2022). Economic security & the regulation of gig work in California: From AB5 to Proposition 22. European Labour Law Journal, 13(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525211063111
European Public Health Association. (2022). 6.J. Workshop: Precarious employment and its impact on social protections in the EU. European Journal of Public Health, 32(Supplement_3). https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.374
Gojek. (2024, August 26). Ketentuan Penggunaan Aplikasi GoPartner Untuk Mitra. Gojek . https://www.gojek.com/id-id/app/ketentuan-penggunaan-aplikasi-gopartner-untuk-mitra-2w
Hendro, A. D., Khiat, D., Wibisono, R. S., Nike, R., & Mahendradani, R. (2021). Identifikasi Kriteria Pekerja Informal terhadap Pemilik Usaha Makan-Minum di Jakarta. Indonesian Business Review, 4(2), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.21632/ibr.4.2.114-133
John Schmitt, H. S. M. P. and S. S. (2023, January 25). The economic costs of worker misclassification. Economic Policy Institute. https://www.epi.org/publication/cost-of-misclassification/
Liya Palagashvili. (2022). Consequences of Restricting Independent Work and the Gig Economy. https://www.mercatus.org/research/policy-briefs/consequences-restricting-independent-work-and-gig-economy
Mohd Salleh, N., Mohamed Shukry, S. N., & Jokinol, V. M. C. (2023). Analyzing the Challenges, Effects, and Motivations of Gig Economy Workers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(6), 2138–2138. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i6/17514
Muhammad Yorga Permana. (2023, November 13). The gig economy as a stepping stone: Career trajectories of online platform workers in Indonesia. The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/seac/2023/11/13/the-gig-economy-as-a-stepping-stone-career-trajectories-of-online-platform-workers-in-indonesia/
Nabiyla Risfa Izzati. (2023, December 21). Workers Lose as Indonesian Laws Can’t Keep Pace With Rideshare Apps. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2023/12/workers-lose-as-indonesian-laws-cant-keep-pace-with-rideshare-apps/
Renny Puspitarini, & Abdul Basit. (2020). Persoalan Struktural Ekonomi Gig: Studi Kasus Star Up Bisnis trasnportasi Daring di indonesia. Jurnal Binawakya, 15(4), 431–432. http://ejurnal.binawakya.or.id/index.php/MBI
Ridhwan Mustajab. (2022, November 30). Mayoritas Tenaga Kerja RI dari Sektor Informal . DataIndonesia.id. https://dataindonesia.id/tenaga-kerja/detail/mayoritas-tenaga-kerja-ri-dari-sektor-informal-pada-agustus-2022
Sakshi Venkatraman. (2023, March 4). Uber and Lyft drivers in California say they’ve been spontaneously fired by apps, report finds. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/uber-lyft-drivers-california-say-ve-spontaneously-fired-apps-report-fi-rcna73262
Sarah Robustelli. (2021). AB 5 and AB 2257 Impacts on Small California Public Agencies [San Jose State University]. https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.zxtd-7nqe
Soerjadi, D. F. (2021). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KETENAGAKERJAAN TERHADAP GIG WORKER DI EVENT ORGANIZER DAERAH KHUSUS IBUKOTA (DKI) JAKARTA SELATAN PADA ERA REVOLUSI INDUSTRI 4.0. JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH, 3(2), 385–386. https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v3i2.20322
Statista Research Department. (2023, August 31). Uber Technologies- statistics & facts. Statisca. https://www.statista.com/topics/4826/uber-technologies/
Umar Kasim, F. Y. H. B. R. A. S. (2020). Reformulation of Work Relationships on the Outsourcing System in Indonesian Order to Protecting the Rights of Workers. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 103(1). https://doi.org/10.7176/JLPG/103-10
Understranding Children’s Work (UCW). (2012). Memahami pekerjaan yang dilakukan oleh anak dan pekerja muda di Indonesia (International Labor Organizaztion (ILO), Trans.). https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@asia/@ro-bangkok/@ilo-jakarta/documents/publication/wcms_183689.pdf
Veena B. Duba. (2017). Wage Slave or Entrepreneur?: Contesting the Dualism of Legal Worker Identities. CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 105(65), 68. https://doi.org/:http://dx.doi.org/10.15779/Z38M84X
Wardhana, V. H. K., Herlina, M. G., Bangsawan, S., & Tuori, M. A. T. (2020a). Regulatory Developments in the Gig Economy: A Literature Review. The Winners, 21(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v21i2.6758
Wardhana, V. H. K., Herlina, M. G., Bangsawan, S., & Tuori, M. A. T. (2020b). Regulatory Developments in the Gig Economy: A Literature Review. The Winners, 21(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v21i2.6758
Wardhana, V. H. K., Herlina, M. G., Bangsawan, S., & Tuori, M. A. T. (2020c). Regulatory Developments in the Gig Economy: A Literature Review. The Winners, 21(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v21i2.6758
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
Yeremias T. Keban, Ari Hernawan, & Ari Hernawan. (2021). Menyoal Kerja Layak dan Adil dalam Ekonomi GIG di Indonesia. https://igpa.map.ugm.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/274/2021/12/Ebook_Menyoal-Kerja-Layak-dan-Adil-dalam-Ekonomi-Gig-di-Indonesia_IGPA-Press.pdf
Yusuf, M. (2022a). Keberlakuan Peraturan Dalam Undang-Undang Yang Tidak Kunjung Diterbitkan Peraturan Pemerintah Sebagai Peraturan Pelaksanaannya. Jurnal Restorasi Hukum, 5(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.14421/jrh.v5i1.2380
Yusuf, M. (2022b). Keberlakuan Peraturan Dalam Undang-Undang Yang Tidak Kunjung Diterbitkan Peraturan Pemerintah Sebagai Peraturan Pelaksanaannya. Jurnal Restorasi Hukum, 5(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.14421/jrh.v5i1.2380
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Erda Afifah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication, i.e. this journal.
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details, and publisher are identified.
